<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Antivirus: Vista vs XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/</link>
	<description>Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-710589</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-710589</guid>
		<description>I would recommend the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy to anyone.
I spent a lot of time searching for a good scanner at an affordable price. I tired many different ones before I found Search-and-destroy Antispyware but when I tired it I was very happy with the results. I would recommend the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy to anyone searching for a great scan that works just as well as Norton and many of the others that you would pay more for. Visit Search-and-destroy to find out more and to give this scan a try just like I did. I’m sure you will love it as much as I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy to anyone.<br />
I spent a lot of time searching for a good scanner at an affordable price. I tired many different ones before I found Search-and-destroy Antispyware but when I tired it I was very happy with the results. I would recommend the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy to anyone searching for a great scan that works just as well as Norton and many of the others that you would pay more for. Visit Search-and-destroy to find out more and to give this scan a try just like I did. I’m sure you will love it as much as I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftystrat</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-535672</link>
		<dc:creator>leftystrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-535672</guid>
		<description>I don't use Vista, but it appears that the UAC is akin to a firewall (albeit a very chatty one) in earlier versions of Windows.  I'm wondering if it's any better.

I'm guessing not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use Vista, but it appears that the UAC is akin to a firewall (albeit a very chatty one) in earlier versions of Windows.  I&#8217;m wondering if it&#8217;s any better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftystrat</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-535673</link>
		<dc:creator>leftystrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-535673</guid>
		<description>I don't use Vista, but it appears that the UAC is akin to a firewall (albeit a very chatty one) in earlier versions of Windows.  I'm wondering if it's any better.

I'm guessing not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use Vista, but it appears that the UAC is akin to a firewall (albeit a very chatty one) in earlier versions of Windows.  I&#8217;m wondering if it&#8217;s any better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbel Saad</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-535898</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbel Saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-535898</guid>
		<description>Well I'm one of the "few" people who turned off UAC, but I would like to ask you which antivirus would you prefer for Windows Vista? an anitivirus that is light yet effective and powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m one of the &#8220;few&#8221; people who turned off UAC, but I would like to ask you which antivirus would you prefer for Windows Vista? an anitivirus that is light yet effective and powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbel Saad</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-535899</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbel Saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-535899</guid>
		<description>Well I'm one of the "few" people who turned off UAC, but I would like to ask you which antivirus would you prefer for Windows Vista? an anitivirus that is light yet effective and powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m one of the &#8220;few&#8221; people who turned off UAC, but I would like to ask you which antivirus would you prefer for Windows Vista? an anitivirus that is light yet effective and powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaxim</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-536152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaxim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-536152</guid>
		<description>&gt;most other people consider it an annoyance and turn it off.

"Most"? I would say that only a "few" like you actually turn it off. I believe MOST people leave it on and are thus protected much more than you think.

But I agree that everyone should still have some kind of antivirus software installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;most other people consider it an annoyance and turn it off.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most&#8221;? I would say that only a &#8220;few&#8221; like you actually turn it off. I believe MOST people leave it on and are thus protected much more than you think.</p>
<p>But I agree that everyone should still have some kind of antivirus software installed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaxim</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-536151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaxim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/windows-antivirus-vista-vs-xp/#comment-536151</guid>
		<description>&gt;most other people consider it an annoyance and turn it off.

"Most"? I would say that only a "few" like you actually turn it off. I believe MOST people leave it on and are thus protected much more than you think.

But I agree that everyone should still have some kind of antivirus software installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;most other people consider it an annoyance and turn it off.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most&#8221;? I would say that only a &#8220;few&#8221; like you actually turn it off. I believe MOST people leave it on and are thus protected much more than you think.</p>
<p>But I agree that everyone should still have some kind of antivirus software installed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
