<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Will You Sign the AOL Petition, Too?</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19095</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 00:29:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19095</guid> <description>The rumers is DEARAOL.COM is being used to collect e-mail address for spamers. Who is behind, owns DEARAOL.COM. The Whois info is hidden. Did you start it Chris?
I have signed and have blogged it. Now I worry I have done the wrong thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rumers is <a
href="http://DEARAOL.COM" title="http://DEARAOL.COM" target="_blank">DEARAOL.COM</a> is being used to collect e-mail address for spamers. Who is behind, owns <a
href="http://DEARAOL.COM" title="http://DEARAOL.COM" target="_blank">DEARAOL.COM</a>. The Whois info is hidden. Did you start it Chris?<br
/> I have signed and have blogged it. Now I worry I have done the wrong thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19094</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 02:42:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19094</guid> <description>Chris - very articulate and thoughtful post.  I&#039;m torn as I see the case you make for the precedence argument, but I feel that your application to the specifics of AOL is just wrong.  According to Henry Blodget&#039;s blog, AOL still makes the vast majority of its total revenue and even its advertising revenue from its subscriber base.  Here&#039;s his post in which he links to his research report on AOL:
http://www.internetoutsider.com/2005/11/while_time_warn.html
Thus, no matter how &quot;valuable&quot; this email revenue stream may be - even if it&#039;s several hundreds of millions of dollars, it couldn&#039;t come close to equaling the loss of subscriber revenue should people find that their email experience is unacceptably degraded.  If anything AOL needs to do everything possible to keep subscribers.
If AOL was acquired through some sort of LBO in which the new management needed to quickly pay down debt, a scheme to ransom addresses to the highest bidder seems much more real.  The current proposal, though, seems more likely to be aimed at protecting AOL&#039;s true golden goose - their subscribers.
arul.blogs.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; very articulate and thoughtful post.  I&#39;m torn as I see the case you make for the precedence argument, but I feel that your application to the specifics of AOL is just wrong.  According to Henry Blodget&#39;s blog, AOL still makes the vast majority of its total revenue and even its advertising revenue from its subscriber base.  Here&#39;s his post in which he links to his research report on AOL:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.internetoutsider.com/2005/11/while_time_warn.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetoutsider.com/2005/11/while_time_warn.html</a><br
/> Thus, no matter how &#8220;valuable&#8221; this email revenue stream may be &#8211; even if it&#39;s several hundreds of millions of dollars, it couldn&#39;t come close to equaling the loss of subscriber revenue should people find that their email experience is unacceptably degraded.  If anything AOL needs to do everything possible to keep subscribers.<br
/> If AOL was acquired through some sort of LBO in which the new management needed to quickly pay down debt, a scheme to ransom addresses to the highest bidder seems much more real.  The current proposal, though, seems more likely to be aimed at protecting AOL&#39;s true golden goose &#8211; their subscribers.<br
/> <a
href="http://arul.blogs.com" title="http://arul.blogs.com" target="_blank">arul.blogs.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tris Hussey</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19093</link> <dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:22:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19093</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.larixconsulting.com/blog/_archives/2006/3/1/1790779.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blogged&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://blog.larixconsulting.com/blog/_archives/2006/3/1/1790779.html" rel="nofollow">Blogged</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tris Hussey</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19092</link> <dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:48:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19092</guid> <description>Done, signed, to be blogged</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done, signed, to be blogged</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Technick</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19091</link> <dc:creator>Technick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:20:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19091</guid> <description>Actually I am not really concerned with signing this. Think about the end effect here. I personally hate AOL and everything they stand for. AOL is not a real service provider, just a souped up BBS system. When and if this takes effect, users will not be able to receive the mail they want. What will users do at this point? Drop AOL and move on to a better service provider. AOL... so easy to us, no wonder it sucks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I am not really concerned with signing this. Think about the end effect here. I personally hate AOL and everything they stand for. AOL is not a real service provider, just a souped up BBS system. When and if this takes effect, users will not be able to receive the mail they want. What will users do at this point? Drop AOL and move on to a better service provider. AOL&#8230; so easy to us, no wonder it sucks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel C.</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19090</link> <dc:creator>Daniel C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:33:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19090</guid> <description>Signed it myself,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/links/Sign_the_petition_to_stop_AOL_s_E-Mail_Tax&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg it as well.&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signed it myself,<br
/> <a
href="http://digg.com/links/Sign_the_petition_to_stop_AOL_s_E-Mail_Tax" rel="nofollow">Digg it as well.</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/comment-page-1/#comment-19089</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:17:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/03/01/will-you-sign-the-aol-petition-too/#comment-19089</guid> <description>Hey Chris, thanks for posting this.  I went ahead and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matthewkappenman.net/blog/?p=225&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogged&lt;/a&gt; it and signed the letter.
Thanks and keep up the great site.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris, thanks for posting this.  I went ahead and <a
href="http://www.matthewkappenman.net/blog/?p=225" rel="nofollow">blogged</a> it and signed the letter.<br
/> Thanks and keep up the great site.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/27 queries in 0.021 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-24 13:15:41 -->