<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Better than Ventrilo for Voice Chat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/whats-better-than-ventrilo-for-voice-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/whats-better-than-ventrilo-for-voice-chat/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Xympa Mogaro</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/whats-better-than-ventrilo-for-voice-chat/#comment-720656</link>
		<dc:creator>Xympa Mogaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=14273#comment-720656</guid>
		<description>I was doing somw research on that matter lately and i found that mumble is not only free its open-source, i&#039;ve had plenty of good reviews about ir, maybe you want to check it out? http://mumble.sourceforge.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing somw research on that matter lately and i found that mumble is not only free its open-source, i&#8217;ve had plenty of good reviews about ir, maybe you want to check it out? <a href="http://mumble.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://mumble.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/whats-better-than-ventrilo-for-voice-chat/#comment-720633</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=14273#comment-720633</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d reccomend 2 different types of voice chat which possibly are better than Ventrillo. 

1.) Teamspeak - If you are looking to pay a reasonable ammount every month, Teamspeak is your option. As ventrillo is the follow-on to teamspeak, it&#039;s known to be better, But more expensive.

2.) Xfire - The great thing about Xfire is - It&#039;s FREE! you have voice chat between you and your friends, and text chat. The only problem is finding your friends. you can search using the search bar at the top, or if your in a game, scroll down to them there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d reccomend 2 different types of voice chat which possibly are better than Ventrillo. </p>
<p>1.) Teamspeak &#8211; If you are looking to pay a reasonable ammount every month, Teamspeak is your option. As ventrillo is the follow-on to teamspeak, it&#8217;s known to be better, But more expensive.</p>
<p>2.) Xfire &#8211; The great thing about Xfire is &#8211; It&#8217;s FREE! you have voice chat between you and your friends, and text chat. The only problem is finding your friends. you can search using the search bar at the top, or if your in a game, scroll down to them there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.219 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 328/332 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-17 02:44:10 -->
