E-Mail:
Get my new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

What PC OEMs Can Do

“Justin” caught our earlier thread on Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows and Apple and PC OEMs (the companies who make PCs for people). I won’t share his specific identity unless permitted, but he has given me pause with this particular message:

I’m watching your recent clip on Mac vs PC, and you state we need to view Apple as a PC OEM, because whatever they are doing right, it can’t just be the operating system. Well, I’ve got to disagree. I’m OEM free, built my machine from the ground up. I have forever been a PC/Windows user until OS X went Intel. If you google my name, you’ll see I’m commonly credited with being the first to get OS X running native on standard PC hardware. At the time it was just a novelty. Fast forward 2.5 years and a lot has changed. OS X is now rock solid on off the shelf PC hardware (given you’ve done the homework on what’s compatible). About a year ago I started toying around with OS X again, dual booting into XP. Now for the last 6 months, OS X is the ONLY operating system on my PC.

Certain OEMs are getting it right in some respects, as evidenced by an open call from last week which will be posted here soon (in which the caller was drooling over an HP Blackbird largely because of the engineering that went on inside the case). That’s great to hear, but every single product that trickles out the door should sport an equally awesome structure – and if it isn’t up to scratch, then the community should say so.

Apple won’t hand OS X over to just any OEM (if it ever does) – but OEMs who care most about their brand and community may stand a better chance for the offer (should it ever happen). Until then, OEMs are sitting underneath Windows – and so are workaday users. There’s so much a PC OEM could do to connect, enthrall, and extend the community beyond computer hobbyists.

The reason I initially started messing around with OS X again was simply for Final Cut Pro. I actually believe Final Cut will play a big role for Apple in the coming years. Mark my words that within 10 years (probably 5), FCP will completely replace Avid in the professional video/film world. Apple has been REALLY on the ball with Final Cut, while Avid has been slipping. But I digress. Final Cut brought me to OS X, and everything else got me to stay. I think it all comes down to the same argument you have for the iPhone vs Windows Mobile — it’s all about implementation. You were playing devils advocate with Kat, pointing out many of the things she liked right off the bat are available in Windows as add-ons or plugins. It’s not about the feature, it’s about the implementation. It’s like comparing Shadow Copy on Vista to Time Machine. Sure, they do the same thing. But my grandmother could use Time Machine. And she can’t even use a word processor.

I play devil’s advocate because I’m right – Windows, at its core, has similar features to OS X. For the most part, average users just need to access email, the Web, and a few multimedia apps. And that’s why Windows works well, and that’s why OEMs have to try even harder to do something with their community in general.

I’d go as far as to say that the first OEM which “insources” a good chunk of their own support and documentation to vetted community members will gain wide support. That’s a PC OEM I could totally back. If Microsoft did more with their community, and gave it products that were truly worth evangelizing, it would naturally happen.

People want to paint me as someone who has completely abandoned all hope for Microsoft, Windows, PC OEMs, etc. – but that’s simply not true (and my continuous advice and support only underscores my as-much-as-possible balanced approach to this industry). I have more advice and help to offer them than I do any other company out there.

Not one OEM has come to me and asked me what they could do better – not one. And if they did, that’s exactly what I’d tell ‘em: IT’S NOT THE FEATURE, IT’S THE IMPLEMENTATION.

Don’t get me wrong, Apple is also a great OEM (all though I would argue an over-priced one). I would buy a Mac Pro in a heart beat if I could afford one (although my machine is comparable, and a fraction of the price–pretty much all the parts are from various SlickDeals). But like the Windows Mobile argument, a device can only be as good as it’s operating system. What makes a mac a mac isn’t the Apple logo, it’s the operating system.

The Mac is more than a logo, too – far more. A device is the hardware, the software, and the community. That last part is typically what gets left off – and Apple doesn’t have to foster community because the community follows it. You might state that so does the world of PC, but that’s so incredibly fragmented (and, quite honestly, filled with people who are FEATURE and not IMPLEMENTATION). I got raked across the coals by the very people I was trying to help back when Jim was taking feedback on Vista – some of them ate me alive because I bothered to question Redmond.

Don’t tell me about a product you made – tell me about a product you want to build, and the entire community will tell you what to do and what NOT to do with it. Don’t give us wacky slogans that make absolutely no sense – just give us an experience we’re genuinely excited to share with everybody around us.

Both Microsoft and PC OEMs would be a bit better off if they took the time to listen – truly listen – to their community. We’re out here trying to help. Evangelists aren’t hired, they’re just… there.

Have you ever heard of Traffic Blazer? Submit your business info to more than 200 search engines and directories and position your Web site for top rankings with Google and other leading search engines - it's available through GoDaddy. Plus, as a listener of The Chris Pirillo Show, enter code CHRIS2 when you check out, and save an additional $5 off any order of $30 or more. Get your piece of the internet at GoDaddy!

6 Comments

How to Start with Ubuntu Linux Safety First Kryptonite Wheat Xbox DVD Flash Player Problems in Mac OS X Dual Boot Between Windows XP and Vista Windows Freeware Egg Drop Wallpaper Is the HP Blackbird 002 any Good?What PC OEMs Can DoTechnology Jobs in Smaller Communities

Michael Rivera (mrivera1)

February 25th, 2008
at 1:03am

I definitely think Chris has a point on this topic. The Mac has an aura that surrounds it, an aura that no PC manufacturer can reproduce. Buying a Mac has a way different feeling compared to buying a regular PC. Replicating that Mac experience on your average run of the mill PC stuff just doesn’t work. Apple listens to their users…Safari for Windows is a great example. Many of the features and fixes I requested were added to the new releases. PC OEM’s and Microsoft don’t seem to understand that. I hear stories of Mac users blogging, chatting, etc. on the first day with a new computer. I spent the first week on my computer getting rid of the crapware and fixing issues. The PC OEM crowd has a lot of work to do, as I know as soon as this computer is of no use to me anymore, I will be making a trip to the Apple Store.

i agree apple is thriving for a greater cause to ensure we get what we pay for in the long run and spend more time enjoying our computer instead of figuring things out and feeling frustrated.

Great read, Chris. In my opinion, a lot of what someone thinks is implemented well is very much based on what they have experience using. If someone has never used a Mac how could they know the features it does have are implemented better than Windows’? For instance… honestly, I have never touched a Mac with the exception of the retail display models like at Best Buy or CompUSA. Basically, Windows is all I know, so, to me, Windows implements what they have to offer the best. Maybe I say this because I have nothing to compare to? Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against Macs. I would love to own one if the price wasn’t stopping me! However, because I’ve been using Windows all my life, that’s what I use. Some day Apple… some day I’ll take the plunge… :)

Very good integration between hardware and software is a highly desirable feature for both the professional and the consumer markets. It ensure that things “just work” for the user. Tigh hardware/software integration can be achieved using Windows based systems, but at a very high cost (look at XP based workstations and certified to run a CAD software like CATIA), which makes it unsuitable for a home product. MS has already started to integrate hardware and software better, (xBox 360), but its efforts are currently not complete. How long till MS proposes a box that integrates a Game console and a “PC” running a tailor made version of Windows for other aps? It would spare us quite a few headaches, but I guess, it will never happen, because the minute MS does this, you can bet that Sony and other big OEMs will do the same with an OS tailored for their hardware and MS will lose a big chunk of its current revenue.

I know that to some, this approach to computers looks like a huge step back in time, but when I think about it, what I care about as a home user today is very different from what I used to care about 15 years ago.

As a customer I want something that “just work” (Is there a copyright on this?). I want performance for the aps I am running. I don’t care about the OS: the thing should be invisible and stay out of my way. As a home user I want to be sure that I will be able to watch the video I am making today in 30 years. I want to make sure that the Text documents I am writing today will remain readable in 30 years.

I know you had to protect Justin’s identity, but could you point us to more information on running OS X on standard PC hardware, preferably hardware we can assemble ourselves?

What Do You Think?