E-Mail:
Get my new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

"Web 2.0" Doesn't Mean Anything Yet

I promised myself I wasn't going to jump into this silly debate, but I just can't help it anymore. Is “Web 2.0″ real or not? That argument is endless, mindless, and pointless. The name, in and of itself, is quite contrived. Someone needed to put a label on what was happening (or about to happen) to wrap a conference around it. That's where the discussion over the term began, and that's where it should end. What we're in the middle of is not a version update – it's a renaissance, and that's what it should be called (if anything):

  • A rebirth or revival.
  • A revival of intellectual or artistic achievement and vigor.
  • The period of such a revival.
  • Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Renaissance or its artistic and intellectual works and styles.

Now, let's see if there are any more allusions to be drawn?

  • During the Renaissance small Italian republics developed into despotisms as the centers of power moved from the landed estates to the cities. Europe itself slowly developed into groups of self-sufficient compartments.
  • Beginning in the latter half of the 15th cent., a humanist faith in classical scholarship led to the search for ancient texts that would increase current scientific knowledge.
  • Humanism in Renaissance rhetoric was a reaction to Aristotelian scholasticism, as espoused by Francis Bacon, Averroës, and Albertus Magnus, among others. While the scholastics claimed a logical connection between word and thought, the humanists differentiated between physical utterance and intangible meditation; they gave common usage priority over sets of logical rules.
  • This experimentation led to the development of contrapuntal music, or music that hinged on the pleasing interplay of two melodic lines.

“Web 2.0,” much like the terms and technologies that envelop it, is perfect for elevator pitches and business plans. The desire to slap a name onto this renaissance is only human nature… even though nobody can agree on where we're going or what we're doing or what it is! We're in the middle of a movement, my friends – let's just enjoy it. Let's just mold it into whatever it gets molded into. “This” is a renaissance – and it won't be properly defined until it's well past us. Stop arguing over what it is and what it's not – just get on with creating things, sharing information, and generally trying to make this world a better place.

Optimize 3.0 is a powerful tool that will allow you to easily manage multiple computers. You can schedule Optimize to run remotely from any computer - anywhere in the World! Save yourself, the IT person, time and money by letting Optimize do the work for you.

5 Comments

>www.badastronomy… Related Content:Flickr Doesn’t own SXSW PhotosBank of America (BoA) SucksI Made ThisRon Paul Wins my VoteCrowdsourcing Videos of the War in IraqBubbleAmerica, Iraq, Gas. amd LinuxAlaska, Ho!”Web 2.0″ Doesn’t Mean Anything YetThings I Have To Laugh At

> [the Web 2.0 label] is perfect for elevator pitches and business plans.
Oh boy, I must respectfully but strongly disagree!!!
HUCKSTER: “And it's Web 2.0!”
VC: “Uh, great. And what do you mean by that?”
H (puzzled): “Well, it's a renaissance! I mean, it's totally new! It's an end-to-end best of breed scalable solution for… [embarrassed pause] Oops, sorry, that was from my Web 1.0 notecard. Er, man, it's, like, Web 2.0! All the cool kids' apps are Web 2.0. So mine is cool, too, and…”
VC: “Excuse me. Can you please tell me, in 30 words or less, what problem your offering solves and why people will pay for it?”
Ding ding ding. As at least one prominent VC guy on the net (dang, where's that link!?) has noted that “Web 2.0! Web 2.0!” makes for a really crappy elevator pitch. Why? Well, Chris, your entry title summed it *perfectly*! “'Web 2.0' Doesn't Mean Anything Yet.” Bingo.

great post!
did you pull the “renaissance” moniker from my recent techcrunch recap?
preceding web2.0 thoughts.
~n

Comeon. Its a generational style. Think music. Every generations education, upbringing, attitude, experiences produces a style that acts as the meme.
Web 2.0 is a bunch of kids who learnt to network/interface programming rather than app/complier programming and spent their adolescence online both pre and post internet.
It's just a product of how programming kids under 30 see the world. And of course always old people hanging around saying they were there first and always bigcos of various types monetising the culture.
It s a style, an attitude, an approach and of course now it's been named it's over. You really had to be there.

Comeon. Its a generational style. Think music. Every generations education, upbringing, attitude, experiences produces a style that acts as the meme.
Web 2.0 is a bunch of kids who learnt to network/interface programming rather than app/complier programming and spent their adolescence online both pre and post internet.
It's just a product of how programming kids under 30 see the world. And of course always old people hanging around saying they were there first and always bigcos of various types monetising the culture.
It s a style, an attitude, an approach and of course now it's been named it's over. You really had to be there.

What Do You Think?