<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: uTorrent vs. Azureus for Torrents</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: George</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-715163</link> <dc:creator>George</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:10:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-715163</guid> <description>Well, four years later the &quot;I&#039;m sure those are coming&quot; part seems more and more deceptive. I&#039;ve waited way too much for simple, extremely intuitive features targeting users like me who want to manage hundreds of torrents.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, four years later the &#8220;I&#8217;m sure those are coming&#8221; part seems more and more deceptive. I&#8217;ve waited way too much for simple, extremely intuitive features targeting users like me who want to manage hundreds of torrents.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AZUREUS FOR LIFE</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-693126</link> <dc:creator>AZUREUS FOR LIFE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-693126</guid> <description>hey azureus is now more better with vuze it can search torrents also it&#039;s better it has in-built media player it has faster dl speeds that utorrent, azureus is the best whatever you say it&#039;s like a monster truck with speed of hell just size is big.
:D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey azureus is now more better with vuze it can search torrents also it&#8217;s better it has in-built media player it has faster dl speeds that utorrent, azureus is the best whatever you say it&#8217;s like a monster truck with speed of hell just size is big.<br
/> :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-693080</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:09:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-693080</guid> <description>I use Bitlord and I find it faster than any torrenter arround there is also a pro version witch apparently is faster and more reliable</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Bitlord and I find it faster than any torrenter arround there is also a pro version witch apparently is faster and more reliable</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nelson</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-691378</link> <dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:09:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-691378</guid> <description>Azureus is not that slow. Vuze is no more opensource. Azureus code inside remains GPL. Azureus is almost the one to run in 64Bit native on Vista ( with JRE  x64 and SWT x64 not included in installation ). And if you install mlDHT you will have both Mainline DHT ( bitcomet, bittorent, utorrent and others ) and the AzDHT ( Azureus specific DHT ) with PEX support for all clients. It&#039;s also one of the most advanced torrent client in the encryption domain. So yes Vuze (formerly Azureus) take more memory and more CPU cycles than others first class torrent client but is much more powerful and multiplatform because of java.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Azureus is not that slow. Vuze is no more opensource. Azureus code inside remains GPL. Azureus is almost the one to run in 64Bit native on Vista ( with JRE  x64 and SWT x64 not included in installation ). And if you install mlDHT you will have both Mainline DHT ( bitcomet, bittorent, utorrent and others ) and the AzDHT ( Azureus specific DHT ) with PEX support for all clients. It&#8217;s also one of the most advanced torrent client in the encryption domain. So yes Vuze (formerly Azureus) take more memory and more CPU cycles than others first class torrent client but is much more powerful and multiplatform because of java.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Azureus fan</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-681692</link> <dc:creator>Azureus fan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-681692</guid> <description>Azureus is open source. uTorrent is closed source. You cannot be sure what the developers will put in there! (DRM protection, tracking, etc?). Downloading speeds are about the same. Azureus uses more resources because it&#039;s Java-based.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Azureus is open source. uTorrent is closed source. You cannot be sure what the developers will put in there! (DRM protection, tracking, etc?). Downloading speeds are about the same. Azureus uses more resources because it&#8217;s Java-based.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: asd</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-680429</link> <dc:creator>asd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-680429</guid> <description>Azureus better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Azureus better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-673643</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-673643</guid> <description>I still like Azureus more. Maybe it&#039;s just me, but it seems to connect to peers and download stuff faster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still like Azureus more. Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but it seems to connect to peers and download stuff faster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-673642</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-673642</guid> <description>Well, I still like Azureus more myself. It seems to download stuff faster, or maybe it&#039;s just me?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I still like Azureus more myself. It seems to download stuff faster, or maybe it&#8217;s just me?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mick Russom</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-627617</link> <dc:creator>Mick Russom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:29:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-627617</guid> <description>utorrent is closed source. sure they aren&#039;t keeping data on you? And now that utorrent is owned by BitTorrent, Inc, do you know that they are trying daily to get into bed with the same content companies that love the RIAA/MPAA so much.How easy it is to get people to sell out - make a &quot;better&quot; product that calls home and gives them everything they need to know to put you down.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>utorrent is closed source. sure they aren&#8217;t keeping data on you? And now that utorrent is owned by BitTorrent, Inc, do you know that they are trying daily to get into bed with the same content companies that love the RIAA/MPAA so much.</p><p>How easy it is to get people to sell out &#8211; make a &#8220;better&#8221; product that calls home and gives them everything they need to know to put you down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: azftw</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-607018</link> <dc:creator>azftw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-607018</guid> <description># A single binary, no other files  - that&#039;s not correct. utorrent needs files in appdata/utorrent
# Fully-automated upgrade process  not correct. fully automated means no input from user. You gotta click the upgrade button ;-) AzCVSUpdater for Azureus is truely fully automated.
When you were using Azureus, you obviously didn&#039;t use AzCVSUpdater, ScaneRSS, SpeedScheduler or any of the extra plugins that extend Az&#039;s functionality even further. And you didn&#039;t even mention seeding, something utorrent is terrible at.
Perhaps you should change your description to - the best bittorrent client for non-seeders :-0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># A single binary, no other files  &#8211; that&#8217;s not correct. utorrent needs files in appdata/utorrent<br
/> # Fully-automated upgrade process  not correct. fully automated means no input from user. You gotta click the upgrade button ;-) AzCVSUpdater for Azureus is truely fully automated.<br
/> When you were using Azureus, you obviously didn&#8217;t use AzCVSUpdater, ScaneRSS, SpeedScheduler or any of the extra plugins that extend Az&#8217;s functionality even further. And you didn&#8217;t even mention seeding, something utorrent is terrible at.<br
/> Perhaps you should change your description to &#8211; the best bittorrent client for non-seeders :-0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PooLover</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-599101</link> <dc:creator>PooLover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:31:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-599101</guid> <description>Why has this thread been going for over 2 years? Who cares! Get a grip. Morons.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has this thread been going for over 2 years? Who cares! Get a grip. Morons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: road_trippin</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-591666</link> <dc:creator>road_trippin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-591666</guid> <description>Does anyone know why azureus is the only client that manages to connect through my company&#039;s firewall - ok it&#039;s not fast (30Kbs max d/l) and I never get a green connection - always yellow or blue but at least it works.  I can&#039;t configure any of the other clients, including utorr, to work.Any ideas?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know why azureus is the only client that manages to connect through my company&#8217;s firewall &#8211; ok it&#8217;s not fast (30Kbs max d/l) and I never get a green connection &#8211; always yellow or blue but at least it works.  I can&#8217;t configure any of the other clients, including utorr, to work.</p><p>Any ideas?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dudewtf?</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-578443</link> <dc:creator>dudewtf?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:45:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-578443</guid> <description>If you can&#039;t decide between the two them, why not use both, and at the same time, thats what I&#039;m doing now. open the .torrent file in both clients but assign them the same download location, see what happens, compare the speeds of Azureus and utorrent for the same torrent, that&#039;ll help you decide which one to keep and which one to get rid off.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t decide between the two them, why not use both, and at the same time, thats what I&#8217;m doing now. open the .torrent file in both clients but assign them the same download location, see what happens, compare the speeds of Azureus and utorrent for the same torrent, that&#8217;ll help you decide which one to keep and which one to get rid off.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vargas</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-576515</link> <dc:creator>vargas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:25:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-576515</guid> <description>This is quite late but here it is.I have to agree.uTorrent is looking more and more desirable right now. I&#039;ve had it with Azureus. Too damned slow!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite late but here it is.</p><p>I have to agree.uTorrent is looking more and more desirable right now. I&#8217;ve had it with Azureus. Too damned slow!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: unknown</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/comment-page-3/#comment-573326</link> <dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:08:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/10/19/utorrent-vs-azureus-for-torrents/#comment-573326</guid> <description>Buddy, thanks!!I agree Utorrent is the best. I used to use Ares Galaxy but I found it to be a bullshit freeware. Now I can link all types of files from Limwire, Ares, Emule, torrents with one software (Utorrent!!) Thanks!!If your asking how I did it, I have a bin file witch my uncle gave to me (He works in ATI so yeah he has all sorts of softwares!!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buddy, thanks!!</p><p>I agree Utorrent is the best. I used to use Ares Galaxy but I found it to be a bullshit freeware. Now I can link all types of files from Limwire, Ares, Emule, torrents with one software (Utorrent!!) Thanks!!</p><p>If your asking how I did it, I have a bin file witch my uncle gave to me (He works in ATI so yeah he has all sorts of softwares!!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.044 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-25 08:31:37 -->