<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Top 10 IE7 Annoyances</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: I Hate Firefox and Thunderbird ~ Windows Fanatics</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-228380</link> <dc:creator>I Hate Firefox and Thunderbird ~ Windows Fanatics</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-228380</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Yes, I realize that an increasing amount of people are using Firefox for Web browsing and Thunderbird for viewing email (as well as managing other information). I, however, am not a flyer of the Firefox flag. I support Mozilla&#8217;s efforts, but I don&#8217;t think their software is amazing&#8230; yet. And before you begin to criticize my choices, understand that I&#8217;m just as annoyed with IE7. I have Firefox installed on my machine, but the only time I use it is when I&#8217;m troubleshooting a Web page.  Recently, Thunderbird users have been seeing mis-Capitalized Words in Lockergnome newsletters. At first, I thought it was a random hiccup - but then more subscribers started to complain. The common thread between them was the Thunderbird client. Tonight will prove my sleuthing efforts successful or void, as I believe I&#8217;ve identified the problem and fixed it. If not, then it&#8217;s back to the drawing board - back to trying to fix a problem that I inadvertently created. But is it really my problem, or is it the email client&#8217;s issue in the first place? [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, I realize that an increasing amount of people are using Firefox for Web browsing and Thunderbird for viewing email (as well as managing other information). I, however, am not a flyer of the Firefox flag. I support Mozilla&#8217;s efforts, but I don&#8217;t think their software is amazing&#8230; yet. And before you begin to criticize my choices, understand that I&#8217;m just as annoyed with IE7. I have Firefox installed on my machine, but the only time I use it is when I&#8217;m troubleshooting a Web page.  Recently, Thunderbird users have been seeing mis-Capitalized Words in Lockergnome newsletters. At first, I thought it was a random hiccup &#8211; but then more subscribers started to complain. The common thread between them was the Thunderbird client. Tonight will prove my sleuthing efforts successful or void, as I believe I&#8217;ve identified the problem and fixed it. If not, then it&#8217;s back to the drawing board &#8211; back to trying to fix a problem that I inadvertently created. But is it really my problem, or is it the email client&#8217;s issue in the first place? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: YAMU: Top 10 IE7 Annoyances</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-33767</link> <dc:creator>YAMU: Top 10 IE7 Annoyances</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:06:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-33767</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Top 10 IE7 Annoyances     LOL, I just had to post about this, many of you are probably familiar with the name Chris Pirillo. Well, some weeks ago he published a list of top 10 IE7 annoyances. Quite a funny and revealing read, and he makes no secret of the fact he is a Maxthon fan too.Despite these snags, IE7 is certainly a better Web browser than IE6. IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not even close to switching from Maxthon 1.x (though I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t like the way Maxthon 2.x is shaping up).   Check it out! [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 IE7 Annoyances     LOL, I just had to post about this, many of you are probably familiar with the name Chris Pirillo. Well, some weeks ago he published a list of top 10 IE7 annoyances. Quite a funny and revealing read, and he makes no secret of the fact he is a Maxthon fan too.Despite these snags, IE7 is certainly a better Web browser than IE6. IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not even close to switching from Maxthon 1.x (though I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t like the way Maxthon 2.x is shaping up).   Check it out! [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-24076</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:24:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-24076</guid> <description>You say: &quot; ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a modal icon - meaning it should only show up when thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s something there to see! &quot;
Sorry but that&#039;s not how the modal word should be understood. I reached this page looking for &quot;modal&quot; and &quot;save&quot;. The save dialogue in IE7 is modal (inside the browser window), meaning it is alwasys on top and you can&#039;t use other tab while saving is in progress. And this is annoying.Modal ICON? What a heck is a modal icon?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say: &#8221; ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a modal icon &#8211; meaning it should only show up when thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s something there to see! &#8221;<br
/> Sorry but that&#8217;s not how the modal word should be understood. I reached this page looking for &#8220;modal&#8221; and &#8220;save&#8221;. The save dialogue in IE7 is modal (inside the browser window), meaning it is alwasys on top and you can&#8217;t use other tab while saving is in progress. And this is annoying.</p><p>Modal ICON? What a heck is a modal icon?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: G. Szusz</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-23169</link> <dc:creator>G. Szusz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:01:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-23169</guid> <description>...IE&#039;s biggest error is that it has failed to appeal to the imaginative web-designer by bringing full-screen capability back as a default feature. Once again, design is limited to &quot; a page at a time&quot;, totally blowing by the real potential of what a screen can do...and, please, no sob stories about spoofing...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;IE&#8217;s biggest error is that it has failed to appeal to the imaginative web-designer by bringing full-screen capability back as a default feature. Once again, design is limited to &#8221; a page at a time&#8221;, totally blowing by the real potential of what a screen can do&#8230;and, please, no sob stories about spoofing&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: I Hate Firefox and Thunderbird (GnomeREPORT)</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-23073</link> <dc:creator>I Hate Firefox and Thunderbird (GnomeREPORT)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:32:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-23073</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] No phrase in the English language will get me into more hot water than the one I opted to use as the headline for today&#8217;s report. You must understand that I wrote it to get your attention. Do I have your attention now? Great.Yes, I realize that an increasing amount of people are using Firefox for Web browsing and Thunderbird for viewing email (as well as managing other information). I, however, am not a flyer of the Firefox flag. I support Mozilla&#8217;s efforts, but I don&#8217;t think their software is amazing&#8230; yet. And before you begin to criticize my choices, understand that I&#8217;m just as annoyed with IE7. I have Firefox installed on my machine, but the only time I use it is when I&#8217;m troubleshooting a Web page. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No phrase in the English language will get me into more hot water than the one I opted to use as the headline for today&#8217;s report. You must understand that I wrote it to get your attention. Do I have your attention now? Great.Yes, I realize that an increasing amount of people are using Firefox for Web browsing and Thunderbird for viewing email (as well as managing other information). I, however, am not a flyer of the Firefox flag. I support Mozilla&#8217;s efforts, but I don&#8217;t think their software is amazing&#8230; yet. And before you begin to criticize my choices, understand that I&#8217;m just as annoyed with IE7. I have Firefox installed on my machine, but the only time I use it is when I&#8217;m troubleshooting a Web page. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Ericson</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-23026</link> <dc:creator>John Ericson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-23026</guid> <description>&quot; &#039;Do you want to move or copy files from this zone?&#039; Yes, I do - or I wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t have tried it in the first place, you fool. ThereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s no clear or easy way of eliminating this prompt, other than applying this registry hack.&quot;What registry hack?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; &#8216;Do you want to move or copy files from this zone?&#8217; Yes, I do &#8211; or I wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t have tried it in the first place, you fool. ThereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s no clear or easy way of eliminating this prompt, other than applying this registry hack.&#8221;</p><p>What registry hack?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Funny comment on Microsoft and security</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-23024</link> <dc:creator>John&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Funny comment on Microsoft and security</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:01:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-23024</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hilarious and quite an on the spot comment by jccalhoun on Chris Pirillo&#8217;s article Top 10 IE7 Annoyances Microsoft seems to have a very different definition of Ã¢â‚¬Å“securityÃ¢â‚¬Â? than I do. They seem to think that poping up a window that says, Ã¢â‚¬Å“Are you sure that you really want to do this???Ã¢â‚¬Â? is some form of security. Call me crazy, but I think it would be better to actually make things secure rather than just put up warning signs. Putting up a flashing sigh that says, Ã¢â‚¬Å“pothole aheadÃ¢â‚¬Â? may make it more obvious where the pothole is, but it doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t do anything about fixing the pothole. Microsoft needs to spend more time fixing the potholes and less time putting up flashing signs. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sid</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-23003</link> <dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-23003</guid> <description>Chris, I&#039;m curious to know what exactly about Maxthon 2 bugs you. I&#039;ve tried it, and it seems to me like an improvement over Maxthon 1 in every way possible.Is it the UI?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I&#8217;m curious to know what exactly about Maxthon 2 bugs you. I&#8217;ve tried it, and it seems to me like an improvement over Maxthon 1 in every way possible.</p><p>Is it the UI?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Saqib</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-23002</link> <dc:creator>Saqib</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:04:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-23002</guid> <description>My #1 new-feature request (which I know won&#039;t make it in IE7) is some kind of decent download resuming, and not needing to open a new window for each file I download!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My #1 new-feature request (which I know won&#8217;t make it in IE7) is some kind of decent download resuming, and not needing to open a new window for each file I download!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roberto J. Dohnert</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-22744</link> <dc:creator>Roberto J. Dohnert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:23:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-22744</guid> <description>&quot; Those who say this is not easily portable are rightÃ¢â‚¬Â¦.when did you last see Windows XP for Power PC? &quot;Your right there is no Windows for PowerPC, but there is Windows for Itanium, there is Windows for Opteron, and the is Windows for 32 bit.  So writing in assembly is an idiotic suggestion</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Those who say this is not easily portable are rightÃ¢â‚¬Â¦.when did you last see Windows XP for Power PC? &#8221;</p><p>Your right there is no Windows for PowerPC, but there is Windows for Itanium, there is Windows for Opteron, and the is Windows for 32 bit.  So writing in assembly is an idiotic suggestion</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Selcuk Islamoglu</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-22740</link> <dc:creator>Selcuk Islamoglu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:18:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-22740</guid> <description>Actually with IE7, my biggest problem is definitely &quot;resource hunger&quot;.  I made a little self test with like 9 tabs of same pages open in Firefox, IE7b3 and maxthon 1.x as you used (with IE7 beta3 engine). Results are amazing, definitely maxthon using 20 mb&#039;s of ram with Firefox following with 45 mb&#039;s with IE, 120 mb&#039;s...Oh and not to mention let me &quot;put&quot; File Edit View&quot; menu bar to top, I&#039;m not going to use Vista for a while!  Oh and that&#039;s possibly most disappointing appearance from Maxthon 2.0 screenshots to see title and menu at same while hoping it is different on final.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually with IE7, my biggest problem is definitely &#8220;resource hunger&#8221;.  I made a little self test with like 9 tabs of same pages open in Firefox, IE7b3 and maxthon 1.x as you used (with IE7 beta3 engine). Results are amazing, definitely maxthon using 20 mb&#8217;s of ram with Firefox following with 45 mb&#8217;s with IE, 120 mb&#8217;s&#8230;</p><p>Oh and not to mention let me &#8220;put&#8221; File Edit View&#8221; menu bar to top, I&#8217;m not going to use Vista for a while!  Oh and that&#8217;s possibly most disappointing appearance from Maxthon 2.0 screenshots to see title and menu at same while hoping it is different on final.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darren</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-22735</link> <dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:59:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-22735</guid> <description>Top 1 annoyance with chris.pirillo.com:#1. Your feed keeps getting refreshed, so Bloglines keeps displaying the same stories over and over again. I&#039;m not sure if this is your fault of BL&#039;s, but I&#039;m going with you, as I&#039;m not seeing the behaviour elsewhere in my 200 feeds.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 1 annoyance with <a
href="http://chris.pirillo.com" title="http://chris.pirillo.com" target="_blank">chris.pirillo.com</a>:</p><p>#1. Your feed keeps getting refreshed, so Bloglines keeps displaying the same stories over and over again. I&#8217;m not sure if this is your fault of BL&#8217;s, but I&#8217;m going with you, as I&#8217;m not seeing the behaviour elsewhere in my 200 feeds.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rod Trent at myITforum.com : Chris Pirillo needs to cut down on his coffee intake!</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-22726</link> <dc:creator>Rod Trent at myITforum.com : Chris Pirillo needs to cut down on his coffee intake!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:50:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-22726</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/   Published Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:11 PM by rtrent Filed Under: Internet, Windows [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a
href="http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/" rel="nofollow">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/</a> Published Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:11 PM by rtrent Filed Under: Internet, Windows [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: marc klink</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-22697</link> <dc:creator>marc klink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:45:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-22697</guid> <description>The major problem I see with IE7, and all MS stuff is bloat. Although I have a fast machine, not everyone does. This is why I am using Firefox less and less, and Opera more. They seem to be able to add features without bogging down a slower machine. MS needs to forget about the idea of reusable code [&#039;cause that idea went south about 2 iterations of Windows ago] and get some assembly programmers to write tight code, with much testing to be sure of solidity. Those who say this is not easily portable are right....when did you last see Windows XP for Power PC?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major problem I see with IE7, and all MS stuff is bloat. Although I have a fast machine, not everyone does. This is why I am using Firefox less and less, and Opera more. They seem to be able to add features without bogging down a slower machine. MS needs to forget about the idea of reusable code ['cause that idea went south about 2 iterations of Windows ago] and get some assembly programmers to write tight code, with much testing to be sure of solidity. Those who say this is not easily portable are right&#8230;.when did you last see Windows XP for Power PC?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jccalhoun</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/top-10-ie7-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-22692</link> <dc:creator>jccalhoun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/07/11/top-10-ie7-annoyances/#comment-22692</guid> <description>I don&#039;t notice the UI things, however, I have to agree with your first three.  I think they are indicative of the most irritating features of all of Microsoft&#039;s products starting most noticably with XP SP2.  Microsoft seems to have a very different definition of &quot;security&quot; than I do.  They seem to think that poping up a window that says, &quot;Are you sure that you really want to do this???&quot; is some form of security.  Call me crazy, but I think it would be better to actually make things secure rather than just put up warning signs.  Putting up a flashing sigh that says, &quot;pothole ahead&quot; may make it more obvious where the pothole is, but it doesn&#039;t do anything about fixing the pothole. Microsoft needs to spend more time fixing the potholes and less time putting up flashing signs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t notice the UI things, however, I have to agree with your first three.  I think they are indicative of the most irritating features of all of Microsoft&#8217;s products starting most noticably with XP SP2.  Microsoft seems to have a very different definition of &#8220;security&#8221; than I do.  They seem to think that poping up a window that says, &#8220;Are you sure that you really want to do this???&#8221; is some form of security.  Call me crazy, but I think it would be better to actually make things secure rather than just put up warning signs.  Putting up a flashing sigh that says, &#8220;pothole ahead&#8221; may make it more obvious where the pothole is, but it doesn&#8217;t do anything about fixing the pothole. Microsoft needs to spend more time fixing the potholes and less time putting up flashing signs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.159 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.62 @ 2009-11-25 08:58:22 -->