E-Mail:
Get my new Windows 7 eBook (PDF) for $7 with 70+ Tips. Download Now!

The Twitter Effect: Don’t Shoot the Messenger

Jason and I have been having fun back and forth with our respective live streams (and he’s a quick study, let me tell ya). My money would be on Jason to win because, well… he’s just a genius when it comes to building businesses and he has a solid team of people around him at all times. I have great people around me, but my on-site team consists of Ponzi and my two dogs – which beat Jason’s dogs in terms of fluffiness.

I do, however, wish to assert that Jason’s accuracy in respect to what happened at Gnomedex last year is a bit misdirected. I didn’t (and couldn’t) have full perspective on this until what happened with Sara Lacy at SXSW.

At Gnomedex 2007, Dave was merely a messenger for a percentage of the crowd, and while he may have delivered this message differently than anybody else would have… I don’t think he did anything inherently wrong. He’s passionate, he cares about you (and a LOT of people), and he attempted to bring the session back to where the audience’s expectations were meeting the message that was being delivered on-stage.

I suggested then, as I suggest now, that Twitter amplified and exacerbated the emotions of the crowd – making it easier for one negative comment to spring into two to spring into four, eight, sixteen, thirty-two, and so on. Indeed, if you followed some of the people who made negative comments about Jason’s presentation at the time it was happening… they came back around to Mahalo, checked out the Firefox extension, etc.

The exact same thing happened at SXSW, where the expectations of the crowd did not match what was happening on stage. The first person (name?) to say something that resonated with a good portion of the crowd wasn’t to blame for what a portion of the crowd was thinking. Positive or negative, Twitter fuels groupthink. People who watched this Zuckerberg “interview” didn’t find half as much controversy surrounding it as was indicated by the firestorm of digital outbursts that preceded its availability to the general Web.

It wasn’t Dave’s fault – it just wasn’t. Expectations were off, and if anybody’s to blame in this thing – it’s me, and nobody else. I didn’t set expectations properly, and for that I apologize. Inevitably, these things happen – from Scoble’s wonderfully suspiring impromptu announcement at the tail end of Derek’s webcast, to the public admission that someone who was to speak to open information wound up asserting that he believed in UFOs.

Handling 350+ special interest groups simultaneously when they have a direct line to the rest of the world is a completely new challenge. Oh, I love every single one of those special interests (including the ones who label me “ha-ha-serious” publicly). I’m guessing that Gnomedex seats will fill up quickly this year – and Twitter will be all the vehicle it needs to sell out.

Speaking of, Ponzi tells me that August 20 – 23 are looking like the best dates for us. I know it’s getting kinda late, but we’re doing our best over here (and we wear several hats to keep our costs low). Stuart Maxwell will be helping us again, too – thank goodness. Stay tuned, and I would like to pre-apologize for any outbursts that may occur this year. :)

In all seriousness, again – to both Dave and Jason, I’m sorry.

GoDaddy Web hosting plans are now more powerful than ever. Best of all, their plans start at just $3.95/month! No matter what plan you choose, your site receives 24/7 maintenance and protection in a world-class data center. Plus, as a listener of The Chris Pirillo Show, enter code CHRIS3 and get your .COM domain name for just $6.95 a year. Get your piece of the internet at GoDaddy!

16 Comments

and foolishly, I got myself mixed up in it. I apologized for doing so, and I stick by that apology. There were two versions of what happened, and I’m happy to say that Chris Pirillo, the organizer of the conference, finally spoke up and toldhis versionof the story. For the most part I agree with what Chris said. I think he should have spoken sooner, it would have saved me a lot of grief, for sure. Perhaps next time you hear another version of this story, you could tell the person telling the tale

on Twitter, blogs, IM, and other forms of live media. But while this new form of conference interactivity–where audiences are using the online tools to demand to be heard–may best be known for ugly scenes at South by Southwest this year orat Gnomedex last year, there’s no reason participants can’t turn the emergence of this backchannel into something positive for everyone. If you’re not sure what I’m talking about, consider this: Today, there are so many ways to communicate that even in a

The Twitter Effect: Don’t Shoot the Messenger ~ Chris Pirillo

on Twitter, blogs, IM, and other forms of live media. But while this new form of conference interactivity—where audiences are using the online tools to demand to be heard—may best be known for ugly scenes at South by Southwest this year orat Gnomedex last year, there’s no reason participants can’t turn the emergence of this backchannel into something positive for everyone. If you’re not sure what I’m talking about, consider this: Today, there are so many ways to communicate that even in a conference

…and, this time, Chris Pirillo hasgot Dave’s back. Let’s recap what happened, in short form. Jason Calacanis was giving a talk. To an audience. Of which Dave was a part. Dave (and some others) didn’t like the presentation. Dave (but nobody else) decided to interrupt the presentation and heckle.

on Twitter, blogs, IM, and other forms of live media. But while this new form of conference interactivity–where audiences are using the online tools to demand to be heard–may best be known for ugly scenes at South by Southwest this year orat Gnomedex last year, there’s no reason participants can’t turn the emergence of this backchannel into something positive for everyone. If you’re not sure what I’m talking about, consider this: Today, there are so many ways to communicate that even in a

and foolishly, I got myself mixed up in it. I apologized for doing so, and I stick by that apology. There were two versions of what happened, and I’m happy to say that Chris Pirillo, the organizer of the conference, finally spoke up and toldhis versionof the story. For the most part I agree with what Chris said. I think he should have spoken sooner, it would have saved me a lot of grief, for sure. Perhaps next time you hear another version of this story, you could tell the person telling the tale

Dave Winer’s meltdown at Gnomedex 2007. My take on his comments are that one, Winer wasn’t alone in his opinion, and two, no one else would have handled the situation in the same way but, hey, that’s Dave Winer. Dave Winer, of course,

August, and foolishly, I got myself mixed up in it. I apologized for doing so, and I stick by that apology. There were two versions of what happened, and I’m happy to say that Chris Pirillo, the organizer of the conference, finally spoke up and toldhis versionof the story. For the most part I agree with what Chris said. I think he should have spoken sooner, it would have saved me a lot of grief, for sure. Perhaps next time you hear another version of this story, you could tell the person telling the tale

on Twitter, blogs, IM, and other forms of live media. But while this new form of conference interactivity–where audiences are using the online tools to demand to be heard–may best be known for ugly scenes at South by Southwest this year orat Gnomedex last year, there’s no reason participants can’t turn the emergence of this backchannel into something positive for everyone. If you’re not sure what I’m talking about, consider this: Today, there are so many ways to communicate that even in a conference

Twitter’s like a magnifying glass or a feedback loop for issues. There could be some great psychological studies on the effect. Real time critiques are new to almost everything but sports. So someone goes into a room and reads people saying “this sucks” or whatever and preconceptions are formed and it gets magnified as it spreads.

I’ve noticed this affect with ratings. I’m more likely to rate something higher if I noticed other people are rating it higher and vice versa, like on Netflix, Amazon, or blog polling. It’s an interesting effect, social proof.

From the audience last year as my first Gnomedex that attack was kind of a shock, but it solidified two things for me. 1. Dave Weiner is very strong willed and direct, and 2. Jason has a fantastic capacity to deal with attacks, and strong willed people.

Gnomedex is a venue where it’s ok to be strong willed, or opinionated, unlike SXSW it seems.

Twitter made it feel like we were all involved, engaged, and I’m looking foreword to twittering from Gnomedex again.

See ya there.

Greg

I believe it was Aaron Brazell (@technosailor) who pulled first heckle on Zuck — “Beacon Sucks!” But not sure who first heckled SL.

Chris, I totally agree with you that Dave Winer’s behavior at Gnomedex 2007 was fine and dandy.

However I disagree that it was your fault, Chris.

Jason simply is not flexible at all in thinking and for example he keeps lies about me on his blog although I totally sorted out the misunderstanding with Russell. I think that instead of being angry, Jason should hire Dave Winer as consultant/adviser for Mahalo ;-)

[...] and I’m happy to say that Chris Pirillo, the organizer of the conference, finally spoke up and told his version of the story. [...]

Gnomedex and Twitter…

Gnomedex has a different vibe every year, driven by whatever currents are pushing the web community. I felt something a little off in 2007 from reports, maybe from a disconnect between Twitter and the structure of the meeting….

What Do You Think?