<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Best Digital Photo Frame (Review)</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: rcbowman</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-694641</link> <dc:creator>rcbowman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:46:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-694641</guid> <description>But...The one thing Ceiva and (once upon a time) Kodak did, and the sole and exclusive reason I can see for getting a digital picture frame at all, is connect to the internet and download pictures *by themselves*. The whole point was (and the only reason I want such a frame is) to give it to grandma, who wants to see pix from kids and grandkids, and who absolutely will not get or use a computer, let alone set up an internet connection.What is needed is a version of the Ceiva and Kodak which will connect to the internet via a local access number, for LESS than the cost of dialup internet access (since it need only connect for a few minutes a day, and can be set to do so late at night, like the Kodak and Ceiva), but which will then download from any website, flickr or whatever, to avoid the feeds. It&#039;s a tragedy that Kodak didn&#039;t support their product. Compuserv or AOL or someone like that (with universal local access dialup numbers) should have jumped in and set up this sort of option. I can&#039;t see why no one has bothered.But as is, these photo frames which just use an existing internet connection through a computer or router, are totally useless for the sole purpose I&#039;ve ever seen for the frames. If you already have internet access set up in your house, why on earth would you need a limited doodad in addition to your computer to look at pix at a lower resolution?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;</p><p>The one thing Ceiva and (once upon a time) Kodak did, and the sole and exclusive reason I can see for getting a digital picture frame at all, is connect to the internet and download pictures *by themselves*. The whole point was (and the only reason I want such a frame is) to give it to grandma, who wants to see pix from kids and grandkids, and who absolutely will not get or use a computer, let alone set up an internet connection.</p><p>What is needed is a version of the Ceiva and Kodak which will connect to the internet via a local access number, for LESS than the cost of dialup internet access (since it need only connect for a few minutes a day, and can be set to do so late at night, like the Kodak and Ceiva), but which will then download from any website, flickr or whatever, to avoid the feeds. It&#8217;s a tragedy that Kodak didn&#8217;t support their product. Compuserv or AOL or someone like that (with universal local access dialup numbers) should have jumped in and set up this sort of option. I can&#8217;t see why no one has bothered.</p><p>But as is, these photo frames which just use an existing internet connection through a computer or router, are totally useless for the sole purpose I&#8217;ve ever seen for the frames. If you already have internet access set up in your house, why on earth would you need a limited doodad in addition to your computer to look at pix at a lower resolution?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Digital Picture Frame ~ Chris Pirillo</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646554</link> <dc:creator>Digital Picture Frame ~ Chris Pirillo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:45:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-646554</guid> <description>[...] And according to Chris, this is what a digital Photo Frame should be. In fact, Chris calls it the best digital photo frame. That&#8217;s high praise coming from a technology pundit. An exciting addition to any home, the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And according to Chris, this is what a digital Photo Frame should be. In fact, Chris calls it the best digital photo frame. That&#8217;s high praise coming from a technology pundit. An exciting addition to any home, the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-581270</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:09:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-581270</guid> <description>Sid, I got the Brookstone photo frame for Christmas. This has none of the advanced features of the Memory Frame and the screen is slightly smaller, but it couldn&#039;t be simpler to set up and get running. One short, clear page of instructions in the well-organized user manual was all I needed. It took no more than 15 minutes to figure out how to connect to my PC and download a bunch of photos. Click one button on top of the frame and you&#039;re off and running.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sid, I got the Brookstone photo frame for Christmas. This has none of the advanced features of the Memory Frame and the screen is slightly smaller, but it couldn&#8217;t be simpler to set up and get running. One short, clear page of instructions in the well-organized user manual was all I needed. It took no more than 15 minutes to figure out how to connect to my PC and download a bunch of photos. Click one button on top of the frame and you&#8217;re off and running.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-581268</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:03:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-581268</guid> <description>The frame may have many capabilities, but the User Manual is very disorganized and virtually incomprehensible, so I have found it impossible to get the frame working, and the Customer Support at Digital Spectrum has not responded to my several requests (email; no phone support) for assistance. What to do?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The frame may have many capabilities, but the User Manual is very disorganized and virtually incomprehensible, so I have found it impossible to get the frame working, and the Customer Support at Digital Spectrum has not responded to my several requests (email; no phone support) for assistance. What to do?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sid</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-565318</link> <dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:53:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-565318</guid> <description>Hi
I am looking for a basic frame where I can just stick in a USB drive, load some pictures (jpeg files, etc) and view them in a slide show (without the USB drive / memory card sticking in). So, I dont need Internet synching. Is there a simple frame that does this well?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br
/> I am looking for a basic frame where I can just stick in a USB drive, load some pictures (jpeg files, etc) and view them in a slide show (without the USB drive / memory card sticking in). So, I dont need Internet synching. Is there a simple frame that does this well?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Knott</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-564881</link> <dc:creator>Don Knott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:51:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-564881</guid> <description>How do you get the frame to work with Flickr? I setup my useraccount ID under the settings for photo sharing but when I go to load the slideshow it gives an error that it couldn&#039;t login. I didn&#039;t see a section under the the flickr id in settings for a password. Did I miss something obvious?I&#039;ve only gotten it to work with using the RSS feed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get the frame to work with Flickr? I setup my useraccount ID under the settings for photo sharing but when I go to load the slideshow it gives an error that it couldn&#8217;t login. I didn&#8217;t see a section under the the flickr id in settings for a password. Did I miss something obvious?</p><p>I&#8217;ve only gotten it to work with using the RSS feed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-563461</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-563461</guid> <description>Any advice on getting reviews on basic digital frames, that is, the best available without all the extra bells and whistles my technology challenged family can&#039;t handle?  Simply put in Flash card and play type?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any advice on getting reviews on basic digital frames, that is, the best available without all the extra bells and whistles my technology challenged family can&#8217;t handle?  Simply put in Flash card and play type?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stu</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-562467</link> <dc:creator>stu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-562467</guid> <description>I purchased the 15&quot;  IDS wireless pic frame at Sam&#039;s Club which supports Flickr and Google. The big issue I&#039;m having is that the frame displays a list of tags from flickr that correspond to the tags assigned to your photos. However, when you choose a tag, the frame proceeds to display a maximum of 20 photos and then repeats the same 20 photos indefinitely. I think this may be because each tag is an RSS feed and flickr only provides links to the most recent 20 photos in a RSS feed. I&#039;d like the frame to sequence through all my photos, not just the most recent 20. Any ideas?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased the 15&#8243;  IDS wireless pic frame at Sam&#8217;s Club which supports Flickr and Google. The big issue I&#8217;m having is that the frame displays a list of tags from flickr that correspond to the tags assigned to your photos. However, when you choose a tag, the frame proceeds to display a maximum of 20 photos and then repeats the same 20 photos indefinitely. I think this may be because each tag is an RSS feed and flickr only provides links to the most recent 20 photos in a RSS feed. I&#8217;d like the frame to sequence through all my photos, not just the most recent 20. Any ideas?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tomg</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-560060</link> <dc:creator>tomg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 05:26:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-560060</guid> <description>I just purchased a frame at Sams Club that &quot;shares photos wirelessly over the internet&quot; (IDS1500).  It does this with a WiFi dongle (included) to your Access Point (WEP or WPA) and gives you the choice of using Yahoo or Google photo services (I couldn&#039;t get the Yahoo service to work, but the Google works just fine).  The photos don&#039;t get saved on the frame, they are accessed in real time.  The software on the frame is accessed through a bunch of menus...no way to update the SW I can see...it works now, but I wonder what happens when Yahoo/Google change something about their protocol  and the frame can&#039;t communicate with the service anymore?  I can see why Ceiva works as well as it does.  In any case, the frame has card slots that work just fine.  This is a 15&quot; frame for $300.  It seems to work just fine (on Google).  I&#039;ve looked at a number of these internet frames since my Ceiva accounts expired a couple of months ago.  Each one has some &quot;gotchas&quot; (like the Kodak frame that won&#039;t show full frame because the Kodak photo storage WEB site doesn&#039;t save photos at a high enough resolution).  It looks like the beginning of the end for subscriptions!  bye, tomg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a frame at Sams Club that &#8220;shares photos wirelessly over the internet&#8221; (IDS1500).  It does this with a WiFi dongle (included) to your Access Point (WEP or WPA) and gives you the choice of using Yahoo or Google photo services (I couldn&#8217;t get the Yahoo service to work, but the Google works just fine).  The photos don&#8217;t get saved on the frame, they are accessed in real time.  The software on the frame is accessed through a bunch of menus&#8230;no way to update the SW I can see&#8230;it works now, but I wonder what happens when Yahoo/Google change something about their protocol  and the frame can&#8217;t communicate with the service anymore?  I can see why Ceiva works as well as it does.  In any case, the frame has card slots that work just fine.  This is a 15&#8243; frame for $300.  It seems to work just fine (on Google).  I&#8217;ve looked at a number of these internet frames since my Ceiva accounts expired a couple of months ago.  Each one has some &#8220;gotchas&#8221; (like the Kodak frame that won&#8217;t show full frame because the Kodak photo storage WEB site doesn&#8217;t save photos at a high enough resolution).  It looks like the beginning of the end for subscriptions!  bye, tomg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cheaha</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-541906</link> <dc:creator>Cheaha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:16:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-541906</guid> <description>Chris, your comment about not being able to do multiple accounts...well do what I did.   Create a new Flickr account and create contacts for all the media you want.  Then just sync the frame with that account and not your own.  As you need to change it you just change that account.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, your comment about not being able to do multiple accounts&#8230;well do what I did.   Create a new Flickr account and create contacts for all the media you want.  Then just sync the frame with that account and not your own.  As you need to change it you just change that account.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brent</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-502696</link> <dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-502696</guid> <description>Chris,
I&#039;m still pretty partial to diy frames.  It takes a little more work, but It&#039;s cheaper and can do anything you want it to including flickr syncing.  i think its worth the extra work for those that aren&#039;t afraid of a little hardware hacking.  The one I made is here:
http://brentevans.blogspot.com/2007/05/converting-old-laptop-into-digital.htmlA whole website of them with photos and how-to&#039;s are here:
http://diydigitalframes.blogspot.com/I think the for-purchase ones like the one you are talking about are catching up though.  Looks pretty good for the price.Brent</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br
/> I&#8217;m still pretty partial to diy frames.  It takes a little more work, but It&#8217;s cheaper and can do anything you want it to including flickr syncing.  i think its worth the extra work for those that aren&#8217;t afraid of a little hardware hacking.  The one I made is here:<br
/> <a
href="http://brentevans.blogspot.com/2007/05/converting-old-laptop-into-digital.html" rel="nofollow">http://brentevans.blogspot.com/2007/05/converting-old-laptop-into-digital.html</a></p><p>A whole website of them with photos and how-to&#8217;s are here:<br
/> <a
href="http://diydigitalframes.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://diydigitalframes.blogspot.com/</a></p><p>I think the for-purchase ones like the one you are talking about are catching up though.  Looks pretty good for the price.</p><p>Brent</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rikia</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-389457</link> <dc:creator>rikia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:45:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-389457</guid> <description>I liked your review of the digital picture frame and went to purchase it on line.  There are two wireless models, one discounted.  Do you have an opinion of the cheaper MF 810W?Thanks,
Rikia</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked your review of the digital picture frame and went to purchase it on line.  There are two wireless models, one discounted.  Do you have an opinion of the cheaper MF 810W?</p><p>Thanks,<br
/> Rikia</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sam Costello</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-372596</link> <dc:creator>Sam Costello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-372596</guid> <description>Great review/walkthrough, Chris! Very informative. I&#039;d love to get my hands on one of these to try it out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review/walkthrough, Chris! Very informative. I&#8217;d love to get my hands on one of these to try it out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glen</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-371233</link> <dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-371233</guid> <description>This sounds like what I am looking for, a frame I can put up at my parents place and upload new pictures of the grandkids to when I want. I have been looking for a networkable frame, and was even willing to try one that was ethernet only, but wireless is a big plus!Not sure about the internet capability, although in the end it would probably be a lot simpler than remote controlling my moms PC and uploading pictures to the frame that way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like what I am looking for, a frame I can put up at my parents place and upload new pictures of the grandkids to when I want. I have been looking for a networkable frame, and was even willing to try one that was ethernet only, but wireless is a big plus!</p><p>Not sure about the internet capability, although in the end it would probably be a lot simpler than remote controlling my moms PC and uploading pictures to the frame that way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Digital Media Thoughts - Digital Media News & Views</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/comment-page-1/#comment-381208</link> <dc:creator>Digital Media Thoughts - Digital Media News & Views</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/05/27/the-best-digital-photo-frame-review/#comment-381208</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Best Digital Photo Frame Ever? &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Best Digital Photo Frame Ever?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 13/35 queries in 0.040 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-23 14:47:51 -->