Add to iTunes | Add to YouTube | Add to Google | RSS Feed

You might remember awhile ago, I took a telemarketing call from a company that claimed to provide Web 2.0 services. I strung them along, just to mess with them. On Sept 10th, I did a remote panel session from my home. The panel discussed Web 2.0 technology and its interplay with the government. Ahead of time, the facilitator sent me a list of questions to consider, which I thought would make a good video.

• Do you consider yourself an early adopter/digital immigrant/digital native? – I’m kind of an edge case. Since the day I realized I could do live video all the time, I’ve been doing it. I consider myself an early adopter in most instances. When it comes to hardware, definitely. With software and web services, not so much. I know that I’ll get tied into one website or another, and it could just disappear. That happened a lot with the .com boom. I’m a little more careful these days about giving attention to one website over another.
• Is web 2.0 a fad? If it is, is it necessarily bad? – I don’t think it’s a fad, I think it’s a conference. I think the idea is a little disingenuous when it comes to the Internet. We haven’t seen a massive amount of browser innovation. Google Chrome has stepped it up a couple of notches. It has nothing to do with the Internet though. It has to do with the desktop. With the digital divide closing, we’ve come to rely on different services online. I would rather call it a renaissance, than to label it with a number like 2.0.
• When did you make the switch into the web 2.0 world? Was it a business or personal switch at first? Do you even compartmentalize the two? – No, I don’t compartmentalize the two. No one “makes a switch” into the 2.0 world, it just happens.
• How do you find out about new web 2.0 tools? – I find them the same way I find out about anything. I find out from friends, such as via email invitations, the chat room and even from Geeks. The more people talk about something, the more aware I become of it. I would just as soon turn to my community to learn about new things. It’s funny because I talk out loud to myself all the time. With the camera running live all the time, I’ll mutter about needing to find or do something. Nearly instantly, someone is telling me they can help. That is awesome.
• What web 2.0 tool could you not live without? What is your essential business tool? – Email, honestly. Instant messaging. Those really haven’t changed. The tools have evolved to a certain degree. But instant messaging is still so far behind. I can’t think of the last time that I ran a client that was created by an IM distributor, such as Yahoo or AIM. I use Adium, and I used Trillian before that. I still see the web and the Internet as being predicated on a closed, proprietary model. Eventually, though, all software will be open source. I really believe that.
• It seems like a new web 2.0 comes tool or site out every week, do you try them all or do you wait for the early adopters to weed out the time-wasters? – I’ll take a look. If it seems ok on the surface, it’ll stay on my radar. I don’t stick with one tool or another unless it is of huge value to me. If enough people talk about it, I’ll end up caving in… just like with adding MySpace and Facebook. It depends on where something fits, and what I get from it. It depends on the momentum behind it, and whether it will help me in my endeavors.
• The twitter effect … breaking news, disseminating information instantly vs. the old methods. – Twitter has been interesting. I don’t really complain about the downtime. I love complaining about the people who complain about the downtime. It’s free! Why are you complaining about something you’re getting for nothing? Anyway, I digress. I made a statement about Twitter during Gnomedex: “Twitter is a place for you to say, before thinking about what you actually think”. You see that somewhat in blogs, but Twitter exacerbates the problem. It can be a serious issue when people are feeling emotional about something.

So, those are my quick thoughts about web 2.0. What’s yours?

FirstRSS ERROR: "http://shop.tagjag.com/products/web2.0" NOT FOUND!

Want to embed this video on your own site, blog, or forum? Use this code or download the video:

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rQKKlR7TcCQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rQKKlR7TcCQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br /><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/">Chris</a> | <a href="http://live.pirillo.com/">Live Tech Support</a> | <a href="http://media.pirillo.com/">Video Help</a> | <a href="http://feeds.pirillo.com/ChrisPirilloShow">Add to iTunes</a>

Does Web 2.0 Really Exist?

I’m sorry I lashed out at Steve Jobs – but I just can’t stand it when people ask me how they can upgrade their Internet to this 2.0 thing they keep hearing about…

There’s just something in me that goes off at the sound of someone claiming anything is “Web 2.0.” It’s downright indefinable, as I’ve stated clearly before. A Web site is a Web site is a Web site. A Web service is a Web service is a Web service. They grow. They change lives. But this is hardly something to stamp an number on. And now that we have a pseudo-versioning before, how long will it be before someone claims we’ve officially left Web 3.0 (as if that was a standard to begin with). It’s going… oh, wait. Microsoft to Invest in ‘Web 3.0′:

Seeing as it was late to the game with Web 2.0, Microsoft is making a preemptive effort to be ready the next time around. The company has pledged $500,000 in research grants toward what it calls “Intelligent Web 3.0,” in which the Web becomes more aware of where and how it’s being accessed in order to custom tailor information.

Microsoft (or anybody) can’t late to something that doesn’t exist. This is the Internet – it’s in a constant state of evolution (not intelligent design, as some might argue). I wound up with several threads in my inbox today regarding my admittedly knee-jerk reaction to Jobs’ announcement.

So, we can’t even agree on what “Web 2.0″ is, and already the term “3.0″ is being used. I agree that the future of software is not necessarily on the desktop – but why not just call it that? Why do we have to slap a label on something? I’m fully willing to be the idiot who doesn’t understand that which nobody can agree on a definition for.

But where do you draw the line?

Okay, Maybe I’m the Idiot…

It’s bad enough I have to delete a dozen new social network invites every day, with each one of them hoping to be the “MySpace Killer.” It’s bad enough I have to upload my videos to an increasing amount of video networks just to increase market penetration throughout these “YouTube Killers.” It’s bad enough that (every day) some random PR person asks me to interview the CEO of some new startup that is the “Google Killer” – when they’re not even aware that mere Gnomedex attendance would provide greater coverage and connections.

What I’m really waiting for is a “Web 2.0 Killer” – something that really, truly exists – something that really, truly matters – something that doesn’t exploit the workers – something that doesn’t rely on proprietary anything – something that doesn’t lock me into accounts – something that doesn’t lock me into a community silo – something that doesn’t have a damn label attached to it – something that people can’t get funding for – something that just f’ing works.

But, no… instead, we have consultants selling something that simply doesn’t exist:

Web 2.0 has now, officially, jumped the shark.

This is Why I’m F’ing Sick of Web 2.0

Let’s see what Mike Arrington from TechCrunch has to say about this movement known as Web 2.0 (not to be confused with the Web 2.0 conference)…

In his time on stage at Gnomedex, Mike speaks to several examples of “Web 2.0″ (where it is, and possibly where it’s headed). There are companies that have come really close to going mainstream (much like YouTube, MySpace, and Digg have done). Some people believe the Web 2.0 leaders are smothering smaller players, however. The audience believes that many companies and developers got lucky – while others state that the companies worked hard, with luck playing a minor role.

What other Web 2.0 insights came from this hour? Watch and learn:

Click to Play

Michael Arrington, aside from performing consulting work on business development and marketing strategies, founded the popular website TechCrunch as well as Edgeio (which provides classified listings for just about everything and provides and easy to use search interface for those classifieds).

Other Media Formats: MP3 | FLV

What is Web 2.0?