<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Pirillo &#187; hardware-benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/tag/hardware-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Does the Windows Experience Index Number Mean Anything?</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Pirillo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware-benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software-benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows-Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/22/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/">Does the Windows Experience Index Number Mean Anything?</a></p><p>I think Microsoft&#8217;s heart was in the right place with the Windows Experience Index, but nobody seems to understand why it&#8217;s there. The rating really means nothing &#8211; it&#8217;s a guideline. If a game claims that it was designed for a system with a Windows Experience Index number of 4.0, and your computer is rated [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/">Does the Windows Experience Index Number Mean Anything?</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/">Does the Windows Experience Index Number Mean Anything?</a></p><p>I think Microsoft&#8217;s heart was in the right place with the Windows Experience Index, but nobody seems to understand why it&#8217;s there. The rating really means nothing &#8211; it&#8217;s a guideline. If a game claims that it was designed for a system with a Windows Experience Index number of 4.0, and your computer is rated at 5.0, you&#8217;re set. Paul Genato asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>I recently saw your segment on 4 GB or RAM with Windows Vista, and your other video segments which were very helpful and informative. I have another related question and I hope you can help me. I am a new Notebook PC owner and have a Windows Vista Ultimate 64-Bit Notebook PC with 4GB of RAM, an Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 CPU, and a 256 MB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS video card. I am curious to know whether my Notebook PC is taking full advantage of the 4GB installed in it. One reason I ask is because of the 4.8 rating for Memory (RAM) on the Windows Experience Index which is close to the rating of a Notebook PC with 2 GB RAM, and with a similar CPU and video card installed in it. This 2 GB RAM Notebook PC turns out to have a rating also, of about 4.8. Why the discrepancy? I expected the 4GB of RAM to push the rating up to 5.5 or something like that since it has twice as much RAM. Is there something I can do to make the rating higher or make more use of the RAM available? I already followed Windows Help’s suggestion of increasing the Virtual Memory to the recommended setting of 6139 MB of initial paging size file of Virtual Memory. I increased the maximum size to 17517 MB for maximum paging size file of Virtual Memory, which was about 2 and a half times the amount of the initial size as the “Windows Help” screen suggested. I did this and the rating is still 4.8. Please tell me if this rating matters or not, and/or if it is accurate. </p>
<p>I am now running a tuner card to watch HDTV, I have open several internet pages, have a movie trailer for my Windows DreamScene desktop background running, and am running one or two applications at the same time without any hang ups. While I do this my task manager shows that 2.47 GB of RAM is being used. If I had this same set up having all those same applications running with 2 GB of RAM would my system start bogging down or crashing, or would it still just perform as smooth as it is right now?  I wonder about that since the Windows Experience Index has around a 4.8 rating for a 2 GB RAM Notebook PC too. I hope you can tell me your take on it, I would really appreciate it. Thank you.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, at least you&#8217;re running smoother than you were before!</p>
<p><a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/">Does the Windows Experience Index Number Mean Anything?</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chris.pirillo.com/does-the-windows-experience-index-number-mean-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.385 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 451/463 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-16 20:02:40 -->
