<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Wars Prequels vs. the Original Trilogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sithprince</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778788</link>
		<dc:creator>Sithprince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778788</guid>
		<description>In a sentence, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. All of your points are so flawed, that it immediately informs me of the level of ignorance I&#039;m dealing with. Simply put, all of your criticisms against the originals berate the elements that constitute a good plot and solid character development, and all of your pro-prequel point disregard everything that makes an interesting story. What this review tells me, is that you know nothing about solid storytelling, and that you like it when things go boom. And it&#039;s not &quot;George&#039;s story&quot;. The only reason Star Wars worked is because people like Gary Kurtz told him that lots of his ideas sucked and had to be changed, and thank God they did. Otherwise Han would be a weird alien, Luke would be a midget, C-3PO would be a sleeze-bag, and who knows what else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a sentence, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. All of your points are so flawed, that it immediately informs me of the level of ignorance I&#8217;m dealing with. Simply put, all of your criticisms against the originals berate the elements that constitute a good plot and solid character development, and all of your pro-prequel point disregard everything that makes an interesting story. What this review tells me, is that you know nothing about solid storytelling, and that you like it when things go boom. And it&#8217;s not &#8220;George&#8217;s story&#8221;. The only reason Star Wars worked is because people like Gary Kurtz told him that lots of his ideas sucked and had to be changed, and thank God they did. Otherwise Han would be a weird alien, Luke would be a midget, C-3PO would be a sleeze-bag, and who knows what else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778281</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778281</guid>
		<description>People who go all &quot;The prequels are shit, they ruined it all&quot; are the typical &quot;I liked Star Wars before it got all famous&quot;-people. 
They are not angry with the films, they are angry with the people who like the films, I believe... They should shut their traps and get over it. Didn&#039;t like the new ones? Fine, don&#039;t tell everyone  - I don&#039;t walk out of the bathroom and tell everyone about how that shit I just had sucked. No - Keep it to yourself and let everyone else have their own opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who go all &#8220;The prequels are shit, they ruined it all&#8221; are the typical &#8220;I liked Star Wars before it got all famous&#8221;-people. <br />
They are not angry with the films, they are angry with the people who like the films, I believe&#8230; They should shut their traps and get over it. Didn&#8217;t like the new ones? Fine, don&#8217;t tell everyone  - I don&#8217;t walk out of the bathroom and tell everyone about how that shit I just had sucked. No &#8211; Keep it to yourself and let everyone else have their own opinion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Paladino</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778231</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Paladino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778231</guid>
		<description>I have a few things to say, not sure where to begin:

Ultimately, when the entire story and themes and everything previously deiscussed here were established, could there have been some filmmaker who would have accomplished it all it a far more artful and realistic level? Could someone have made that story and those characters as epic as Peter Jackson and LOTR? Obviously. In hindsight there is always a better way to do something.  The point is, George Lucas made it happen and had the vision to start this whole universe, and if for nothing else, we should be grateful and appreciate him for that much.  Do we say the Wright Brothers are crappy engineers because they couldnt invent a 787?

In a similar vein, I believe very strongly that star Wars does not, cannot, and should never exist in the solitude of the movies.  Star Wars has long been embellished, enriched, strengthened, and made infinitely cooler and deeper through the various forms of media it has experienced.  Star Wars hasn&#039;t REALLY belonged to George Lucas exclusively for a very long time.  I know most people dont have the interest or time to do this, but Star Wars has to be understood within its continuity.  there&#039;s 30,000 years of history in books and other media.  Taking a look at almost any of this for perspective on the Anakin Skywalker saga will reveal something that is so much bigger, more important, and infinitely more interesting than the movies alone.  Star Wars, to me, is not defined by the films; the films are a part (albeit an important and entertaining part) of a cultural phenomenon that continues through today and I dont think will ever disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a few things to say, not sure where to begin:</p>
<p>Ultimately, when the entire story and themes and everything previously deiscussed here were established, could there have been some filmmaker who would have accomplished it all it a far more artful and realistic level? Could someone have made that story and those characters as epic as Peter Jackson and LOTR? Obviously. In hindsight there is always a better way to do something.  The point is, George Lucas made it happen and had the vision to start this whole universe, and if for nothing else, we should be grateful and appreciate him for that much.  Do we say the Wright Brothers are crappy engineers because they couldnt invent a 787?</p>
<p>In a similar vein, I believe very strongly that star Wars does not, cannot, and should never exist in the solitude of the movies.  Star Wars has long been embellished, enriched, strengthened, and made infinitely cooler and deeper through the various forms of media it has experienced.  Star Wars hasn&#8217;t REALLY belonged to George Lucas exclusively for a very long time.  I know most people dont have the interest or time to do this, but Star Wars has to be understood within its continuity.  there&#8217;s 30,000 years of history in books and other media.  Taking a look at almost any of this for perspective on the Anakin Skywalker saga will reveal something that is so much bigger, more important, and infinitely more interesting than the movies alone.  Star Wars, to me, is not defined by the films; the films are a part (albeit an important and entertaining part) of a cultural phenomenon that continues through today and I dont think will ever disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayub Dada</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayub Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778208</guid>
		<description>Dude, the story of the prequels hold so many historical references, mythological elements and psychological truths that many professors in the subjects rave about the movies. Even big film makers like Peter Jackson and Kevin Smith. There are so much more to the stories than you can see. You have no right to say George Lucas&#039; story is bad especially when every story he&#039;s ever created has been brilliant and has become an instant hit.

The reasons people have always been more favorable to the originals are these. The Originals were fun films. George had brought back the old fashioned romantic fun movies that had been missing for so long. The story was about the rise of the rebels. Who would hate fun movies with fun iconic characters? Of course it stuck. 

The new ones are more depressing and dramatic which is cool as well, but a larger audience (especially the fans) wanted another fun ride which wasn&#039;t possible with the exception of TPM. Of course they&#039;re not gonna think much of it.

Fans from the 70&#039;s ruined Star Wars. They&#039;ve been talking so much hate since 1997 and have been putting it in their kids heads and the heads of those who think they&#039;re smarter by liking old things. They&#039;ve started a bandwagon so strong that anyone who watches Star Wars has to at least get some blow from it. So everyone is being told this rhetoric all the time which causes them to hop on like everyone else. Even though they really have no arguments.

The hate on the prequels has kept the prequels from rising to where they could have been up there. The same would&#039;ve happened if everyone started hating on Empire when it came out, then Jedi. The only real famous one would be A new hope. A movie can only be so great until it needs support from fans to rise.

Sorry dude, but I think you ruined your own memories of Star Wars. I think if you just take your hate cap off and watch them with un bias eyes, you won&#039;t hate them so bad. Worked for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, the story of the prequels hold so many historical references, mythological elements and psychological truths that many professors in the subjects rave about the movies. Even big film makers like Peter Jackson and Kevin Smith. There are so much more to the stories than you can see. You have no right to say George Lucas&#8217; story is bad especially when every story he&#8217;s ever created has been brilliant and has become an instant hit.</p>
<p>The reasons people have always been more favorable to the originals are these. The Originals were fun films. George had brought back the old fashioned romantic fun movies that had been missing for so long. The story was about the rise of the rebels. Who would hate fun movies with fun iconic characters? Of course it stuck. </p>
<p>The new ones are more depressing and dramatic which is cool as well, but a larger audience (especially the fans) wanted another fun ride which wasn&#8217;t possible with the exception of TPM. Of course they&#8217;re not gonna think much of it.</p>
<p>Fans from the 70&#8242;s ruined Star Wars. They&#8217;ve been talking so much hate since 1997 and have been putting it in their kids heads and the heads of those who think they&#8217;re smarter by liking old things. They&#8217;ve started a bandwagon so strong that anyone who watches Star Wars has to at least get some blow from it. So everyone is being told this rhetoric all the time which causes them to hop on like everyone else. Even though they really have no arguments.</p>
<p>The hate on the prequels has kept the prequels from rising to where they could have been up there. The same would&#8217;ve happened if everyone started hating on Empire when it came out, then Jedi. The only real famous one would be A new hope. A movie can only be so great until it needs support from fans to rise.</p>
<p>Sorry dude, but I think you ruined your own memories of Star Wars. I think if you just take your hate cap off and watch them with un bias eyes, you won&#8217;t hate them so bad. Worked for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayub Dada</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778207</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayub Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778207</guid>
		<description>Well, I think that&#039;s kind of unfair to say, I don&#039;t think directors care more about CGI than the story (unless it&#039;s Micheal Bay) and I don&#039;t like the &quot;everything old is better bandwagon&quot; they&#039;ve been saying that for decades. Which means the old silent films with no plots were better than movies today. And I don&#039;t think CGI effected the concept at all, if it did, then you&#039;d be watching pointless scenes of nothing, but CGI, but no, every scene had a purpose, I think having CGI inspired let Lucas do exactly what he wants in his head so he takes good advantage of it. And Honestly I thought Revenge was great. The cutting up of the movie was how George has been doing Star Wars for years, I liked it, and of course Anakin being seduced added up. They&#039;ve been pushing him their since episode 1! Plus, Roger Ebert and Richard Roper both gave a good review to it, so if you&#039;re talking critical flaws, you just told two of the greatest critics of all time that they&#039;re wrong. You turned down a Two thumbs up movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think that&#8217;s kind of unfair to say, I don&#8217;t think directors care more about CGI than the story (unless it&#8217;s Micheal Bay) and I don&#8217;t like the &#8220;everything old is better bandwagon&#8221; they&#8217;ve been saying that for decades. Which means the old silent films with no plots were better than movies today. And I don&#8217;t think CGI effected the concept at all, if it did, then you&#8217;d be watching pointless scenes of nothing, but CGI, but no, every scene had a purpose, I think having CGI inspired let Lucas do exactly what he wants in his head so he takes good advantage of it. And Honestly I thought Revenge was great. The cutting up of the movie was how George has been doing Star Wars for years, I liked it, and of course Anakin being seduced added up. They&#8217;ve been pushing him their since episode 1! Plus, Roger Ebert and Richard Roper both gave a good review to it, so if you&#8217;re talking critical flaws, you just told two of the greatest critics of all time that they&#8217;re wrong. You turned down a Two thumbs up movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayub Dada</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayub Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-778206</guid>
		<description>Probably because none of them were born yet... And didn&#039;t even meet up yet and it would be a boring story of luke farming, Leia flying ships everywhere talking to politicians and Han smuggling. Where&#039;s the plot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably because none of them were born yet&#8230; And didn&#8217;t even meet up yet and it would be a boring story of luke farming, Leia flying ships everywhere talking to politicians and Han smuggling. Where&#8217;s the plot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanereid91</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-777809</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanereid91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-777809</guid>
		<description>the prequels are just as good as the origonals except they took out some of the most iconic charactors. han solo, technicaly darth vader, luke skywalker. why?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the prequels are just as good as the origonals except they took out some of the most iconic charactors. han solo, technicaly darth vader, luke skywalker. why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scifigeek17</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-777805</link>
		<dc:creator>Scifigeek17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-777805</guid>
		<description>When you mentioned this was George Lucas&#039;s story, there is truth but the prequels are not based from his original concept. I&#039;ve done plenty of research and Lucas&#039;s first and second drafts for the story are complete oppsites! Another point is, Lucas wrote all three originals where as with the prequels, he didn&#039;t wrote them all, first episode 1, filmed it, episode 2, filmed it and by the 3rd movie he was like &quot;wow, I have alot to rap up&quot;. No offence, but Revenge of the Sith was very poor, filmwise. The shots are very short, scenes don&#039;t last more then a few minutes, it&#039;s cut, cut, cut and sloopy. Anakin being suduced does not add up.

And there is another point that is very critical. Back in the 70&#039;s Lucas was limited with what he could accomplish with his ideas. They didn&#039;t have the fancy effects as we do today. The ability to make C.G.I. and advanced graphics majorly effected the concept of the prequel films. Had they been made back in the 70&#039;s they would be much different.

In this generation, movie directors are all into &quot;special effects&quot; then the actual story. If you enjoy the prequel films, that&#039;s fine. But I&#039;ll never come to a point where I can say &quot;they fit with the originals&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you mentioned this was George Lucas&#8217;s story, there is truth but the prequels are not based from his original concept. I&#8217;ve done plenty of research and Lucas&#8217;s first and second drafts for the story are complete oppsites! Another point is, Lucas wrote all three originals where as with the prequels, he didn&#8217;t wrote them all, first episode 1, filmed it, episode 2, filmed it and by the 3rd movie he was like &#8220;wow, I have alot to rap up&#8221;. No offence, but Revenge of the Sith was very poor, filmwise. The shots are very short, scenes don&#8217;t last more then a few minutes, it&#8217;s cut, cut, cut and sloopy. Anakin being suduced does not add up.</p>
<p>And there is another point that is very critical. Back in the 70&#8242;s Lucas was limited with what he could accomplish with his ideas. They didn&#8217;t have the fancy effects as we do today. The ability to make C.G.I. and advanced graphics majorly effected the concept of the prequel films. Had they been made back in the 70&#8242;s they would be much different.</p>
<p>In this generation, movie directors are all into &#8220;special effects&#8221; then the actual story. If you enjoy the prequel films, that&#8217;s fine. But I&#8217;ll never come to a point where I can say &#8220;they fit with the originals&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Davies</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776694</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776694</guid>
		<description>The sort of people who have no pubic hair like the prequels :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sort of people who have no pubic hair like the prequels :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Davies</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776695</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776695</guid>
		<description>The sort of people who have no pubic hair like the prequels :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sort of people who have no pubic hair like the prequels :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Davies</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776693</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776693</guid>
		<description>You are so blind. Star wars use to be something that people of all ages could enjoy, the original star wars films have stuck with people and stood the test of time. Why? Because they had solid content, great plot, awesome lightsaber fights. The fact is that the prequels are just kid films, you see them enjoy the CGI and fireworks of it all but kids can not look deeper then that...they like that sort of thing. They will just mature and relise that they are not all they are cracked up to be... I know because I am one of them. I remember seeing TPM for the first time and loved it but the films that have stuck with me all my life and I can watch over and over and over again..Star wars, Empire strikes back and return of the jedi. The REAL star wars fillms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so blind. Star wars use to be something that people of all ages could enjoy, the original star wars films have stuck with people and stood the test of time. Why? Because they had solid content, great plot, awesome lightsaber fights. The fact is that the prequels are just kid films, you see them enjoy the CGI and fireworks of it all but kids can not look deeper then that&#8230;they like that sort of thing. They will just mature and relise that they are not all they are cracked up to be&#8230; I know because I am one of them. I remember seeing TPM for the first time and loved it but the films that have stuck with me all my life and I can watch over and over and over again..Star wars, Empire strikes back and return of the jedi. The REAL star wars fillms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Davies</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776692</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-776692</guid>
		<description>You are so blind. Star wars use to be something that people of all ages could enjoy, the original star wars films have stuck with people and stood the test of time. Why? Because they had solid content, great plot, awesome lightsaber fights. The fact is that the prequels are just kid films, you see them enjoy the CGI and fireworks of it all but kids can not look deeper then that...they like that sort of thing. They will just mature and relise that they are not all they are cracked up to be... I know because I am one of them. I remember seeing TPM for the first time and loved it but the films that have stuck with me all my life and I can watch over and over and over again..Star wars, Empire strikes back and return of the jedi. The REAL star wars fillms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so blind. Star wars use to be something that people of all ages could enjoy, the original star wars films have stuck with people and stood the test of time. Why? Because they had solid content, great plot, awesome lightsaber fights. The fact is that the prequels are just kid films, you see them enjoy the CGI and fireworks of it all but kids can not look deeper then that&#8230;they like that sort of thing. They will just mature and relise that they are not all they are cracked up to be&#8230; I know because I am one of them. I remember seeing TPM for the first time and loved it but the films that have stuck with me all my life and I can watch over and over and over again..Star wars, Empire strikes back and return of the jedi. The REAL star wars fillms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pirillo</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-774695</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Pirillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-774695</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re different kinds of movies. The premise / story is generally solid, but it&#039;s mired in sophomoric dialogue and plot holes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re different kinds of movies. The premise / story is generally solid, but it&#8217;s mired in sophomoric dialogue and plot holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel_lr</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-774672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel_lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-774672</guid>
		<description>The prequels are SO much more epic than the original trilogy. Don&#039;t hit me, but I actually preferred them. IMHO, Episode 3 has the most epic storyline ever: the whole loss of innocence, turning over to the dark side...it gives Darth Vader a whole new dimension that the originals just couldn&#039;t provide. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prequels are SO much more epic than the original trilogy. Don&#8217;t hit me, but I actually preferred them. IMHO, Episode 3 has the most epic storyline ever: the whole loss of innocence, turning over to the dark side&#8230;it gives Darth Vader a whole new dimension that the originals just couldn&#8217;t provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel_lr</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-774673</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel_lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/12/05/star-wars-prequels-vs-the-original-trilogy/#comment-774673</guid>
		<description>The prequels are SO much more epic than the original trilogy. Don&#039;t hit me, but I actually preferred them. IMHO, Episode 3 has the most epic storyline ever: the whole loss of innocence, turning over to the dark side...it gives Darth Vader a whole new dimension that the originals just couldn&#039;t provide. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prequels are SO much more epic than the original trilogy. Don&#8217;t hit me, but I actually preferred them. IMHO, Episode 3 has the most epic storyline ever: the whole loss of innocence, turning over to the dark side&#8230;it gives Darth Vader a whole new dimension that the originals just couldn&#8217;t provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.291 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 471/475 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-17 02:54:36 -->
