<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashdot Comments vs. Digg Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/</link>
	<description>Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Krista</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-691946</link>
		<dc:creator>Krista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/01/27/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/#comment-691946</guid>
		<description>informative post, keep it up.,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>informative post, keep it up.,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordKaT</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-18816</link>
		<dc:creator>LordKaT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/01/27/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/#comment-18816</guid>
		<description>I find that comparing both Digg and Slashdot is difficult. While their purpose both appears to be reproting on geek news, they go about it in totally different fashions: Digg is a community-created website whereas Slashdot is a more traditional editorial type of site.
Also, the actual comments themselves are displayed differently: Digg displays them flat, while Slashdot displays them in threaded order. Digg&#39;s system of commenting is prone to "quickies" (similar to Fark) in which a person will just post a comment and not bother reading any of the above comments.
Slashdot&#39;s system, on the other hand, provokes discussion, since, when you reply to an author, your comment is displayed AS a reply to the author. This not only helps segregate your comment from, say, a trolls comment, but it also helps the author find your comment and reply it to.
Digg users generally tend to be younger and more immature in nature, while the older crowd thends to lurk on Slashdot. Both sites have their issues with trolls.
In my opinion, both of them suck. Digg is too community driven for my tastes (thus, it tends to post hyped up fanboy news to the front page), and Slashdot is too reliant upon its editors, which often leads to potentially good stories going down the shitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that comparing both Digg and Slashdot is difficult. While their purpose both appears to be reproting on geek news, they go about it in totally different fashions: Digg is a community-created website whereas Slashdot is a more traditional editorial type of site.<br />
Also, the actual comments themselves are displayed differently: Digg displays them flat, while Slashdot displays them in threaded order. Digg&#39;s system of commenting is prone to &#8220;quickies&#8221; (similar to Fark) in which a person will just post a comment and not bother reading any of the above comments.<br />
Slashdot&#39;s system, on the other hand, provokes discussion, since, when you reply to an author, your comment is displayed AS a reply to the author. This not only helps segregate your comment from, say, a trolls comment, but it also helps the author find your comment and reply it to.<br />
Digg users generally tend to be younger and more immature in nature, while the older crowd thends to lurk on Slashdot. Both sites have their issues with trolls.<br />
In my opinion, both of them suck. Digg is too community driven for my tastes (thus, it tends to post hyped up fanboy news to the front page), and Slashdot is too reliant upon its editors, which often leads to potentially good stories going down the <acronym title="shitter">*******</acronym>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-18815</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/01/27/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/#comment-18815</guid>
		<description>Hi!
I definately prefer digg since the whole website is more structured. Slashdot is just a mess... It&#39;s therefore hard to read the comments. I don&#39;t think that there are quality differences though.
&lt;a href="http://www.roedig.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tobias&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!<br />
I definately prefer digg since the whole website is more structured. Slashdot is just a mess&#8230; It&#39;s therefore hard to read the comments. I don&#39;t think that there are quality differences though.<br />
<a href="http://www.roedig.com" rel="nofollow">Tobias</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-18814</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/01/27/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/#comment-18814</guid>
		<description>Brilliant bait for the double-whammy Slash/Dugg Effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant bait for the double-whammy Slash/Dugg Effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-18813</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/01/27/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/#comment-18813</guid>
		<description>*sigh* Please do not feed the Chris... uh, trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh* Please do not feed the Chris&#8230; uh, trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-18812</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/01/27/slashdot-comments-vs-digg-comments/#comment-18812</guid>
		<description>Digg has the worst commenters.  But they cover more stuff, or at least stuff that I find more relavent.  Slashdot seems more specialized, but also has smarter commenters.  BOCTAOE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg has the worst commenters.  But they cover more stuff, or at least stuff that I find more relavent.  Slashdot seems more specialized, but also has smarter commenters.  BOCTAOE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
