Comments on: Searching for Search

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:37:20 +0000

That is hilarious!!! Funniest thing I've read all day… Sarah, http://hyperculture.typepad.com/

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:55:15 +0000

Google.com is #7 on google.com. Hm. We now, officially, have too much time on our hands.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:52:14 +0000

And MSN's own search engine comes in 7th. What's up with that?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:41:24 +0000

HEH HEH, Doesn't that prove it works well?
Run the same search on Google, and you get search.com, but Google is much more popular.

By: Planet Northern Voice

Planet Northern Voice — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

so I get many results. How do I do a search that basically says: ‘Above 600M’ to find me directories with results above 600MB, as many which do not have anything above that are useless? Related Content: Chris DiBona on Google Code at Where 2.0Searching for SearchMatt Cutts of Google on Search Engine Spam Googlefasting: Day 1 Tagging Your Posts for Gnomedex Google Desktop Search vs Windows Vista Search Barbara Manning of GenieKnows.com Google Does Blog Search!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Via my friend Todd Bishop at the PI, Google raises Microsoft antitrust concern. I’m linking to his story since the original NYT post requires registration, which is absolutely l4m3… Related Content:Copernic Desktop Search FeedbackDesktop SearchSearching for SearchNew MSN Search Beta URLsFast FAX FactsGooglefasting: Day 1Desktop Search ToolsGooglefasting: Day 2MSN Toolbar HacksGoogle Does Blog Search!