<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung&#8217;s SSD Hardware is Stupid Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/samsungs-ssd-hardware-is-stupid-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/samsungs-ssd-hardware-is-stupid-fast/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:51:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slardy</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/samsungs-ssd-hardware-is-stupid-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-712483</link>
		<dc:creator>Slardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=13113#comment-712483</guid>
		<description>Chris should try filling the drive up with rows from a database table (or a lot of small files) and then see how fast the SSD is! As the SSD fills up with data, it will take longer and longer for it to recover free space when it needs  to write to a new page. Flash SSD&#039;s will fragment quite badly and the only way to get to run fast again is to run a low level reset on it and you&#039;ll of course lose all your SSD data.

Flash SSD&#039;s are great for reading because they have enormous cache in them, but can be quite slow for writing as the drive fills up. 

Slardy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris should try filling the drive up with rows from a database table (or a lot of small files) and then see how fast the SSD is! As the SSD fills up with data, it will take longer and longer for it to recover free space when it needs  to write to a new page. Flash SSD&#8217;s will fragment quite badly and the only way to get to run fast again is to run a low level reset on it and you&#8217;ll of course lose all your SSD data.</p>
<p>Flash SSD&#8217;s are great for reading because they have enormous cache in them, but can be quite slow for writing as the drive fills up. </p>
<p>Slardy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bolduc</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/samsungs-ssd-hardware-is-stupid-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-712452</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bolduc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=13113#comment-712452</guid>
		<description>Wow, SSD&#039;s seem worth the money, I must say. Even if they are $800.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, SSD&#8217;s seem worth the money, I must say. Even if they are $800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bennett</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/samsungs-ssd-hardware-is-stupid-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-712408</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=13113#comment-712408</guid>
		<description>WOW, that quiet huh? i can imagine it now, &quot;you did turn the computer on right? Ah yeah, i did. You sure? I&#039;m sure i&#039;m sure!&quot;

:D

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, that quiet huh? i can imagine it now, &#8220;you did turn the computer on right? Ah yeah, i did. You sure? I&#8217;m sure i&#8217;m sure!&#8221;</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilter</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/samsungs-ssd-hardware-is-stupid-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-712407</link>
		<dc:creator>ilter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=13113#comment-712407</guid>
		<description>I wonder how they perform when read/write intensive applications are at work. I&#039;m using my computers as Digital Audio Workstations, and I sometimes have to stream 40+ channels of 24 bit audio and record about 8 channels simultaneously.
If SSD drives works at least as decent as 7200 rpm drives and don&#039;t suffer from use, I might be convinced. What&#039;s the life prediction for these? Do they work as USB thumb drives? Is there a solution for fragmentation? I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how they perform when read/write intensive applications are at work. I&#8217;m using my computers as Digital Audio Workstations, and I sometimes have to stream 40+ channels of 24 bit audio and record about 8 channels simultaneously.<br />
If SSD drives works at least as decent as 7200 rpm drives and don&#8217;t suffer from use, I might be convinced. What&#8217;s the life prediction for these? Do they work as USB thumb drives? Is there a solution for fragmentation? I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
