Comments on: Rush is an ID10T

By: Cliffystones

Cliffystones — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:13:02 +0000

I’ve never listened to him, but how is Rush making uninformed comments about computer hardware any worse than the celebs in Hollywood making uninformed comments regarding the political landscape?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:45:19 +0000

I was glad to see Rush is pushing the Mac but he is crazy. You have to understand his listening audience believes whatever he says without him needing to back it up with fact.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Jul 2003 21:58:15 +0000

Hey Steve, great links above. Yeah, even though lobbying has been around for a couple hundred years, it is plain to see from that story on thefacts.com is irrefutable proof that those senators were paid off. Also, that evil Senator First, and that band of Republican thugs, how dare they propose a ban on gay marriage! (you and I both know that a constitutional amendment such that Marilyn Musgrave is introducing doesn't have a snowball's chance, so don't get your anal beads all in a bunch). Evil republican conspiracy be dammed!!!! Seriously now, I don't agree with Republican policy 100%, but I feel it's in the right direction. I hate how someone like yourself who can be so open minded toward homosexuality and gay marriages, can be so close minded toward a differing viewpoint offered by Rush Limbaugh and narrow-mindedly call him childish names based on his appearance. You don't hear me walking around talking about Al Sharpton's huge gut, or Hillary Clinton's wide ass do you? When I hear liberal, moderate, and conservative policy, I tend to like to hear it out and form my own opinions about it. So look past others' opinions, go read the House and Senate resolutions for yourself, and dont regurgitate mindless, knee-jerk, tripe about Rush Limbaugh or the Commander In Chief. And as for George Bush? Well, he's the only president who's given me a check for $1400 bucks, I'll tell you that much. Plus he has to build up America's defense against scalar electromagnetic weapons.... in secret, without us taxpayers knowing about it. Man, you want conspiracy? Here's your goddam WMD's: http://216.247.92.101/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm I'm done with my rant, the 64-bit processor is going to triple the speed of the Photoshop 8 Gaussian Blur filter much to the delight of many Mac users.....little else.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:46:59 +0000

My challenge still stands – show me what good Bush has done that benefits middle class America (and please don't say the iraq war)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:45:52 +0000

Steve, maybe you should look into some counseling. Your hatred is scary-silly, and your analysis of PCs versus servers is a touch ill-informed.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:56:31 +0000

I love it. Because I am against everything the GOP does, I am a liberal. It seems every shittin' time anyone stands up against he GOP thet are liberals.
Let me make it easy on you – I am not a liberal. I am against the GOP because of what they represent. They are against everything that resides within the spirit of America – freedom.
Don't beleive me? http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030629/ap_on_go_co/frist_gay_marriage_3
As for the 64 bit in SERVERS statemant made my might Mac a few post up – what is the difference. Servers are no differewnt than desktops. They all have pretty much the same guts buddy. SO please step off with that weak argument.
Again, Apple isnt doing anything special or new here. And for anyone defending Rush Limbarf, that shows me how much brains they really have and arguing with them is pointless.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:07:54 +0000

Almost as childish as when conservatives label any dissenter as unamerican or compares senators (D's and R's) to Saddam and bin Laden because they don't agree with foolhardy tax cuts.
As for the g5, well I guess it could “change everything,” but will it get them into a double digit market share? Doubt it…besides, there will be some other tech advance sooner rather than later that will “change everything” again.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:38:28 +0000

Why is it that liberals have to resort to name-calling? If you read what he said….you would see it is NOT him saying it. It was announced this week…it's going to change everything. He then mentions after a “-” that he doesn't understand why “that” technology isn't more mainstream.
Name-calling, telling people their computer is crap, their OS is crap and the like is very childish. Only the person who PAYS for and OWNS something and that WORKS for them is the only thing that matters.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:33:37 +0000

You tell him Chris! Woot!Woot!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:08:47 +0000

Matt: I'm no zealot, but as I said above, it could spur on PC companies to rush their 64-bit offerings to the desktop at an accelerated rate (and/or at reduced price). With a large number of early adopters, 64-bit apps and OSes will be forthcoming. I don't think Apple will win over a large number of “switchers” until it is offered in a headless, sub-$600 box that will accept a standard VGA monitor. Apple once again has the chance to make a strong user base even stronger. I, for one, hope they don't blow it.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:21:00 +0000

After re-reading Rush's article, it looks to me like he is repeating Apple's pitch. I don't think Rush is saying it will change everything, he says that Apple says these things.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:16:40 +0000

I think if we ask Motorola, the G5 is changing lots of things for them. Has anyone mentioned that the OS can't yet utilize the 64 bit proc here?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:02:38 +0000

A registered republican? You're pullin our leg. :-)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 08:16:19 +0000

I would like to hear any apple zealot tell why it will change everything.
Anyone remember segway man that was a revolution.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jun 2003 05:43:13 +0000

PC manufactures have been putting Opterons and to a lesser extent Itaniums in their SERVERS. Which means nil to the end user. Why have they been doing that? Because large amount of Data can utilize the bandwidth a 64 bit proc gives, and there aren't many larger forms of data than video and media, which Apple is renknown for. As far as the politics go, I meant right wing, I myself am a Libertarian, but the GOP is no more corrupt than the democrat party, and if you think otherwise, it is you I'm afraid, not Rush who is the idiot.