<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhapsody vs iTunes: Which is Better, and Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrathman44</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-776717</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrathman44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-776717</guid>
		<description>Im a super music whore, and In the early 2000&#039;s i built a library with windows media, many of my songs are really underground. So underground that it is really hard to find even online, so naturally I must keep my windows media, besides the fact I love how windows media will let you break music down by year....anyways that is a different subject. The point im trying to make is that windows media for me is a must. Rhapsody is awesome, but not a big fan of their library set up. No worries though because rhapsody transfers to my windows media quite easily which allows me 
to mix both windows and rhapsody together for playlists. I plan on paying my subscription every year till I die, so to me I own the music. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im a super music whore, and In the early 2000&#8242;s i built a library with windows media, many of my songs are really underground. So underground that it is really hard to find even online, so naturally I must keep my windows media, besides the fact I love how windows media will let you break music down by year&#8230;.anyways that is a different subject. The point im trying to make is that windows media for me is a must. Rhapsody is awesome, but not a big fan of their library set up. No worries though because rhapsody transfers to my windows media quite easily which allows me<br />
to mix both windows and rhapsody together for playlists. I plan on paying my subscription every year till I die, so to me I own the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-771949</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-771949</guid>
		<description>rhapsody is so much better.  no it&#039;s not perfect, but the closest thing we&#039;ve had to a perfect music service was oink, and we know the fat cats could never do something as crazy as actually giving users what they want!  (rip oink!)  if you have a smartphone, you can download as many tracks as you like and play them anywhere- work, car, home stereo.  good point above about netflix- everyone loves netflix, but for some reason many still cling to &quot;owning&quot; music.  it used to make a difference when it was a pain to play your rhapsody &quot;rented&quot; tracks anywhere.  I used the mp3 to go deal they had a while back and it didn&#039;t work too well.  now it&#039;s much better, only $10/month, and no issues.  Download whatever you want to your phone, play it anywhere.  I remember many years ago, looking forward to a time when I could hold a device in my hand that could access almost any music wirelessly and play it for me anywhere, that time has come.  it&#039;s music nirvana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rhapsody is so much better.  no it&#8217;s not perfect, but the closest thing we&#8217;ve had to a perfect music service was oink, and we know the fat cats could never do something as crazy as actually giving users what they want!  (rip oink!)  if you have a smartphone, you can download as many tracks as you like and play them anywhere- work, car, home stereo.  good point above about netflix- everyone loves netflix, but for some reason many still cling to &#8220;owning&#8221; music.  it used to make a difference when it was a pain to play your rhapsody &#8220;rented&#8221; tracks anywhere.  I used the mp3 to go deal they had a while back and it didn&#8217;t work too well.  now it&#8217;s much better, only $10/month, and no issues.  Download whatever you want to your phone, play it anywhere.  I remember many years ago, looking forward to a time when I could hold a device in my hand that could access almost any music wirelessly and play it for me anywhere, that time has come.  it&#8217;s music nirvana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron F</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-767223</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-767223</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s late 2010, and I&#039;m sure a lot of things about Rhapsody have changed since the thread initially started in 2008, but now there&#039;s really not much argument in favor of iTunes.  With rhapsody to go, you can download as much music as your mp3 player (or smartphone) can hold and take it with you.  They have an iPod/iPhone application, so if you&#039;re so married to using that, you don&#039;t get left out in the cold.  And at $15 a month, it&#039;s a better deal for anyone who would otherwise buy at least 1 album a month.  And if you are so concerned about the DRM, there are ways to strip it from the files so you don&#039;t have to keep syncing.

It&#039;s just hard to imagine a scenario where iTunes is more cost effective, unless you only listen to a few albums in which case you should just buy the physical CDs, rip backup copies to your hard drive and be done with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s late 2010, and I&#8217;m sure a lot of things about Rhapsody have changed since the thread initially started in 2008, but now there&#8217;s really not much argument in favor of iTunes.  With rhapsody to go, you can download as much music as your mp3 player (or smartphone) can hold and take it with you.  They have an iPod/iPhone application, so if you&#8217;re so married to using that, you don&#8217;t get left out in the cold.  And at $15 a month, it&#8217;s a better deal for anyone who would otherwise buy at least 1 album a month.  And if you are so concerned about the DRM, there are ways to strip it from the files so you don&#8217;t have to keep syncing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just hard to imagine a scenario where iTunes is more cost effective, unless you only listen to a few albums in which case you should just buy the physical CDs, rip backup copies to your hard drive and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunny</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-758357</link>
		<dc:creator>hunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-758357</guid>
		<description>I like Rhapsody better but i use both.  I like Rhapsody because i can listen to a whole cd before i buy it and if i want to keep hearing it I can download it to my mp3 player to stream it . If I really like it I will buy it .  I will see who has the cheaper price sometimes and get from I tunes if it is cheaper.  I use I tunes for a look up tool for new and noteworthy stuff.  Then again go and listen on Rhapsody.  I also take advantage of paying for a whole year at a discounted rate.  I have been with Rhapsody so long my fee breaks down to about 6.50 a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Rhapsody better but i use both.  I like Rhapsody because i can listen to a whole cd before i buy it and if i want to keep hearing it I can download it to my mp3 player to stream it . If I really like it I will buy it .  I will see who has the cheaper price sometimes and get from I tunes if it is cheaper.  I use I tunes for a look up tool for new and noteworthy stuff.  Then again go and listen on Rhapsody.  I also take advantage of paying for a whole year at a discounted rate.  I have been with Rhapsody so long my fee breaks down to about 6.50 a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Song</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-750616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Song</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-750616</guid>
		<description>Rhapsody is a terrible service.  It is horrible with playlists.  You can&#039;t blend stuff you&#039;ve added via CD to it&#039;s pool of digital rights protected stuff.   It does incredibly annoying things like suddenly put the wrong songs in a playlist you have created or suddenly deleting the playlist, e

I&#039;ve tried for 3 years to make it work and have spent countless hours on the phone with the tech crew.  Pay the money - get itunes... run away from Rhapsody....  It is torture for anyone who really likes to create playlists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhapsody is a terrible service.  It is horrible with playlists.  You can&#8217;t blend stuff you&#8217;ve added via CD to it&#8217;s pool of digital rights protected stuff.   It does incredibly annoying things like suddenly put the wrong songs in a playlist you have created or suddenly deleting the playlist, e</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried for 3 years to make it work and have spent countless hours on the phone with the tech crew.  Pay the money &#8211; get itunes&#8230; run away from Rhapsody&#8230;.  It is torture for anyone who really likes to create playlists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jinkies</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-746895</link>
		<dc:creator>jinkies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-746895</guid>
		<description>Rhapsody gives the artist .001 cents per download, the lowest by far of any digital distributor. Don&#039;t support those crooks, use Itunes instead!! Rhapsody is only interested in paying mainstream artists scads of money for exclusive digital distribution rights even though they make all their money off the backs of the throngs of content creators that comprise the &#039;long tail&#039; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Tail

BTW your blog is bloatware.  It took forever to download all the cheezy crap on this page.  Good thing I&#039;m only here to bitch about Crapsody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhapsody gives the artist .001 cents per download, the lowest by far of any digital distributor. Don&#8217;t support those crooks, use Itunes instead!! Rhapsody is only interested in paying mainstream artists scads of money for exclusive digital distribution rights even though they make all their money off the backs of the throngs of content creators that comprise the &#8216;long tail&#8217; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Tail" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Tail</a></p>
<p>BTW your blog is bloatware.  It took forever to download all the cheezy crap on this page.  Good thing I&#8217;m only here to bitch about Crapsody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity C.</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-734597</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-734597</guid>
		<description>Charity Caravaggio
10-22-09
English 2B
Mr. Anderson





Rhapsody vs. iTunes


	“Wow! Thanks!” I took the nano from him and handed him the fifty bucks. Talk about my lucky day. I had just bought an iPod nano for only 50 dollars!! I mean come one…$50?! That was insanely cheap back then. He said nothing was wrong with it. He said he had just bought it and well he’s my brother so I believed him. Too bad my luck just had to run out. Too bad that wonderful little musical device that later became my world had to freeze and never work ever again. Too bad I was out 50 bucks in about one month’s time. Well after that month I was pretty revved about music so I just had to get another music playing device but I came upon a problem. I didn’t have a source of income so I didn’t have the 100 dollars (or plus) that I needed to buy an iPod. So I bought an MP3 player that had twice as much memory and even looked cooler for only 60 bucks! How cool is that? In getting this new device I used rhapsody to listen and buy music instead of iTunes. I think iTunes lovers should widen their horizons by looking at other music listening/buying medias. I believe that rhapsody is better than iTunes because not everyone has an iPod. 
	Seriously…you wouldn’t believe how happy I was to FINALLY get an iPod. EVERYONE I knew had one and I knew that if I didn’t have one, then I wasn’t as cool as my friends. I didn’t have a hundred dollars just sitting in my pocket though. So for awhile I believed that I wasn’t as “cool” as everyone else. But one day my older brother said he needed money and he would sell me his iPod nano for only 50 bucks! I HAD FIFTY BUCKS! That very day I fished out every cent I owned and gave it all to him just to hold that silver nano in my hand and call it mine. I was thrilled! I told all my friends. I showed it off to them. I matched bling, cases, and even earbuds with it. I think I probably named it something. I loved it. I remember one time when I was grounded from it. I was so depressed I didn’t even eat for a day. It was ridiculous. But after about a month…it,,,it,,,it broke!!
“Katie!!” 
“What?”
“What’s wrong with your computer? I plugged my iPod into it to charge and now my iPod’s frozen!!”
My friend Katie just shrugged her shoulders while she did her make up in the mirror. I felt like banging her head against a wall. Didn’t she know what a crisis this was?!! My iPod wasn’t working!!
“Just see if it will run out of battery power and die then plug it in the computer again.”
“The battery’s not even going down. It’s just stuck!” I felt so frustrated.
“That’s weird,” she said.
I gave her an annoyed look. What a bad day. I was at my best friend’s house. I had plugged my iPod into her computer and now it was BUSTED! My music device that I had loved so much had stopped working…for good. I was mad.

After a little while I decided to buy a Memorex MP3 player for 60 dollars. It had amazing features! It could actually do more than my dinky little nano could do. With it I could listen to the radio, view pictures AND video, store documents, and of course listen to music…but twice as much music! When I did have a nano I used iTunes to listen to songs and buy songs. With my mp3 player I obviously couldn’t use iTunes so I found something else. I found rhapsody. 

From personal experience I believe that rhapsody is better than iTunes. Rhapsody is easier to use, you can create an account, listen to music faster and longer, and you can also buy your music for a lower price. I think my top two all time favorite things about rhapsody is that (1) instead of only listening to 30 seconds of a song you want to hear (iTunes) you can have a 14 day free trial to listen to anything you want! (2) I don’t need to install a desktop client to play music. Rhapsody is strictly internet…no software downloads required. 

I want all the iTunes lovers to know that rhapsody is truly better than iTunes in so many ways and they should really look into it. It’s simpler, it works for the ‘poor’ people who don’t have fancy iPods, it’s more reliable, and it’s cheaper! You will probably find a lot of advantages if you use rhapsody and I practically guarantee that you’ll thoroughly like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charity Caravaggio<br />
10-22-09<br />
English 2B<br />
Mr. Anderson</p>
<p>Rhapsody vs. iTunes</p>
<p>	“Wow! Thanks!” I took the nano from him and handed him the fifty bucks. Talk about my lucky day. I had just bought an iPod nano for only 50 dollars!! I mean come one…$50?! That was insanely cheap back then. He said nothing was wrong with it. He said he had just bought it and well he’s my brother so I believed him. Too bad my luck just had to run out. Too bad that wonderful little musical device that later became my world had to freeze and never work ever again. Too bad I was out 50 bucks in about one month’s time. Well after that month I was pretty revved about music so I just had to get another music playing device but I came upon a problem. I didn’t have a source of income so I didn’t have the 100 dollars (or plus) that I needed to buy an iPod. So I bought an MP3 player that had twice as much memory and even looked cooler for only 60 bucks! How cool is that? In getting this new device I used rhapsody to listen and buy music instead of iTunes. I think iTunes lovers should widen their horizons by looking at other music listening/buying medias. I believe that rhapsody is better than iTunes because not everyone has an iPod.<br />
	Seriously…you wouldn’t believe how happy I was to FINALLY get an iPod. EVERYONE I knew had one and I knew that if I didn’t have one, then I wasn’t as cool as my friends. I didn’t have a hundred dollars just sitting in my pocket though. So for awhile I believed that I wasn’t as “cool” as everyone else. But one day my older brother said he needed money and he would sell me his iPod nano for only 50 bucks! I HAD FIFTY BUCKS! That very day I fished out every cent I owned and gave it all to him just to hold that silver nano in my hand and call it mine. I was thrilled! I told all my friends. I showed it off to them. I matched bling, cases, and even earbuds with it. I think I probably named it something. I loved it. I remember one time when I was grounded from it. I was so depressed I didn’t even eat for a day. It was ridiculous. But after about a month…it,,,it,,,it broke!!<br />
“Katie!!”<br />
“What?”<br />
“What’s wrong with your computer? I plugged my iPod into it to charge and now my iPod’s frozen!!”<br />
My friend Katie just shrugged her shoulders while she did her make up in the mirror. I felt like banging her head against a wall. Didn’t she know what a crisis this was?!! My iPod wasn’t working!!<br />
“Just see if it will run out of battery power and die then plug it in the computer again.”<br />
“The battery’s not even going down. It’s just stuck!” I felt so frustrated.<br />
“That’s weird,” she said.<br />
I gave her an annoyed look. What a bad day. I was at my best friend’s house. I had plugged my iPod into her computer and now it was BUSTED! My music device that I had loved so much had stopped working…for good. I was mad.</p>
<p>After a little while I decided to buy a Memorex MP3 player for 60 dollars. It had amazing features! It could actually do more than my dinky little nano could do. With it I could listen to the radio, view pictures AND video, store documents, and of course listen to music…but twice as much music! When I did have a nano I used iTunes to listen to songs and buy songs. With my mp3 player I obviously couldn’t use iTunes so I found something else. I found rhapsody. </p>
<p>From personal experience I believe that rhapsody is better than iTunes. Rhapsody is easier to use, you can create an account, listen to music faster and longer, and you can also buy your music for a lower price. I think my top two all time favorite things about rhapsody is that (1) instead of only listening to 30 seconds of a song you want to hear (iTunes) you can have a 14 day free trial to listen to anything you want! (2) I don’t need to install a desktop client to play music. Rhapsody is strictly internet…no software downloads required. </p>
<p>I want all the iTunes lovers to know that rhapsody is truly better than iTunes in so many ways and they should really look into it. It’s simpler, it works for the ‘poor’ people who don’t have fancy iPods, it’s more reliable, and it’s cheaper! You will probably find a lot of advantages if you use rhapsody and I practically guarantee that you’ll thoroughly like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naye</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-714737</link>
		<dc:creator>Naye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-714737</guid>
		<description>Hey I have a question, I want to chose a site where I can download music from and be able to put it on a cd or a mp3 player...which site is better itunes, rhapsody, or amazon? I do want a site that offers a subscription so that I am not paying 100.00 for 100 songs...I just need one that has a subscription and allows me to put my songs on a cd or mp3 player...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I have a question, I want to chose a site where I can download music from and be able to put it on a cd or a mp3 player&#8230;which site is better itunes, rhapsody, or amazon? I do want a site that offers a subscription so that I am not paying 100.00 for 100 songs&#8230;I just need one that has a subscription and allows me to put my songs on a cd or mp3 player&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajacks</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-713775</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-713775</guid>
		<description>IMHO none but a goold ol&#039; CD riped in FLAC or WAV is the way to go.

My problem with iTunes is the music you pay for is not the whole but a part. I will not go into file compression and what a mp3 really is at 128 or even 256. If I pay for a song or anything for that matter I would like the whole thing and not a part of it.

I like to see what some say. Everyone is doing it. Cars and so on ipod this and that. iTunes &gt; all and so on. 
My problem with ipod is the same as iTunes. It just can&#039;t do anything right. Sure it does a lot but not one thing good. Take that back. It can surf the web like no other.

With Rhapsody you pay for what you get. You know it is renting. I look at iTunes the same way. It is renting music but I have to pay for every last song I care to hear. Renting.. wha..? Easy. Let me hook this sub par 256k mp3 up to my $5,000 NAD amp and hear good sound. It just down right sucks. What choice do I have but to buy a CD. With Rhapsody I can fire it up at work, car, home PC, laptop, phone ect. Sure it is not all great. Sure I can not fire it up on my home amp just as I can&#039;t with iTunes. My point is you pay for what you get.

FYI do you use netflix? It is renting. For $15 a month I could buy 1 DVD a month. Sure buying is better but it will takes years to become better. Invest in w/e makes you happy. 

Ever hook up good phones to a iphone or ipod? Not that good. Buy a Cowon if music is that important. Buy a Sony Lifestyle laptop tiny WiFi is what you need. I just can&#039;t find anything a ipod or iphone gives to justify its price tag. 

Rhapsody is the way to go so long you understand it is just renting and OK with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO none but a goold ol&#8217; CD riped in FLAC or WAV is the way to go.</p>
<p>My problem with iTunes is the music you pay for is not the whole but a part. I will not go into file compression and what a mp3 really is at 128 or even 256. If I pay for a song or anything for that matter I would like the whole thing and not a part of it.</p>
<p>I like to see what some say. Everyone is doing it. Cars and so on ipod this and that. iTunes &gt; all and so on.<br />
My problem with ipod is the same as iTunes. It just can&#8217;t do anything right. Sure it does a lot but not one thing good. Take that back. It can surf the web like no other.</p>
<p>With Rhapsody you pay for what you get. You know it is renting. I look at iTunes the same way. It is renting music but I have to pay for every last song I care to hear. Renting.. wha..? Easy. Let me hook this sub par 256k mp3 up to my $5,000 NAD amp and hear good sound. It just down right sucks. What choice do I have but to buy a CD. With Rhapsody I can fire it up at work, car, home PC, laptop, phone ect. Sure it is not all great. Sure I can not fire it up on my home amp just as I can&#8217;t with iTunes. My point is you pay for what you get.</p>
<p>FYI do you use netflix? It is renting. For $15 a month I could buy 1 DVD a month. Sure buying is better but it will takes years to become better. Invest in w/e makes you happy. </p>
<p>Ever hook up good phones to a iphone or ipod? Not that good. Buy a Cowon if music is that important. Buy a Sony Lifestyle laptop tiny WiFi is what you need. I just can&#8217;t find anything a ipod or iphone gives to justify its price tag. </p>
<p>Rhapsody is the way to go so long you understand it is just renting and OK with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Laudick</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-708642</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Laudick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-708642</guid>
		<description>Rhapsody is the way to go for sure.  Itunes has only recently took the lock of their song files that you download.  Rhapsody now lets you download mp3&#039;s directly to your PC without any subscription.  In other words they now do a monthly subscription and a song ala carte choice without a subscription.  I recently bought to full albums for $9 and downloaded them without any Rhapsody software installed at all.  They conveniently put the albums into a zip file and I simply downloaded without any other hassle.  How nice is that....  

I hate any store or service that requires you to use their crappy software when all you really want is the song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhapsody is the way to go for sure.  Itunes has only recently took the lock of their song files that you download.  Rhapsody now lets you download mp3&#8242;s directly to your PC without any subscription.  In other words they now do a monthly subscription and a song ala carte choice without a subscription.  I recently bought to full albums for $9 and downloaded them without any Rhapsody software installed at all.  They conveniently put the albums into a zip file and I simply downloaded without any other hassle.  How nice is that&#8230;.  </p>
<p>I hate any store or service that requires you to use their crappy software when all you really want is the song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jace Starwind</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-708470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jace Starwind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-708470</guid>
		<description>Well I prefer rhapsody mainly because I can buy music without drm and it&#039;s about the same quality as the itunes [only an audiophile would tell a difference since itunes uses aac and rhapsody uses mp3] 

Seeing that I use [or used to use] my psp as my main music player itunes was not a choice for me. But now that my psp broke and I&#039;m forced to use my ipod nano [1st gen] I still use rhapsody to buy music but just use itunes to organize my collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I prefer rhapsody mainly because I can buy music without drm and it&#8217;s about the same quality as the itunes [only an audiophile would tell a difference since itunes uses aac and rhapsody uses mp3] </p>
<p>Seeing that I use [or used to use] my psp as my main music player itunes was not a choice for me. But now that my psp broke and I&#8217;m forced to use my ipod nano [1st gen] I still use rhapsody to buy music but just use itunes to organize my collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-702162</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-702162</guid>
		<description>With Rhapsody you get a subscription model and the option to purchase songs. Hook up your computer to a stereo system and you got a full juke box with millions of songs. 

Rhapsody is awesome. I wish more people would see the benefit of using Rhapsody versus ITunes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Rhapsody you get a subscription model and the option to purchase songs. Hook up your computer to a stereo system and you got a full juke box with millions of songs. </p>
<p>Rhapsody is awesome. I wish more people would see the benefit of using Rhapsody versus ITunes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-682199</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-682199</guid>
		<description>For my money, iTunes is definitely a better choice.  The organization of my music, ease of use of the app, a VERY wide selection of songs, movies, games, etc., ownership of the songs, use up to 5 computers, the iPhone, and no one buys 300 songs a week so it just isn&#039;t economical for me to go to Rhapsody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my money, iTunes is definitely a better choice.  The organization of my music, ease of use of the app, a VERY wide selection of songs, movies, games, etc., ownership of the songs, use up to 5 computers, the iPhone, and no one buys 300 songs a week so it just isn&#8217;t economical for me to go to Rhapsody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Morey</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-668033</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-668033</guid>
		<description>Couple of points.

Your iPOD will not work with Rhapsody subscription services, however, you don&#039;t need to store your entire collection on your ipod either.  I have a 20GB ipod with most of my CDs, but sync my 4GB sansa for rhapsody every week or so.  I love it, I completely go with whatever I want every week - I don&#039;t even know what I&#039;m going to put on the Sansa till I start looking in the library. sometimes I just grab every album in the top 10 - no more thinking about money to listent to an album.  

By far - Rhapsody is the service for people who like to hear new music all the time.  I&#039;ll bet I go through 150 new songs a month -  for $15.99 a month.  Did I mention it syncs to mention is plays on Tivo, 5 PCs and 3 MP3 players.   (You do have to sync the mp3 player at least once a month to keep up the licensing - but that&#039;s not a big deal.)

.89 cents a song to purchase with no buring restrictions if you want to burn a CD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of points.</p>
<p>Your iPOD will not work with Rhapsody subscription services, however, you don&#8217;t need to store your entire collection on your ipod either.  I have a 20GB ipod with most of my CDs, but sync my 4GB sansa for rhapsody every week or so.  I love it, I completely go with whatever I want every week &#8211; I don&#8217;t even know what I&#8217;m going to put on the Sansa till I start looking in the library. sometimes I just grab every album in the top 10 &#8211; no more thinking about money to listent to an album.  </p>
<p>By far &#8211; Rhapsody is the service for people who like to hear new music all the time.  I&#8217;ll bet I go through 150 new songs a month &#8211;  for $15.99 a month.  Did I mention it syncs to mention is plays on Tivo, 5 PCs and 3 MP3 players.   (You do have to sync the mp3 player at least once a month to keep up the licensing &#8211; but that&#8217;s not a big deal.)</p>
<p>.89 cents a song to purchase with no buring restrictions if you want to burn a CD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-666014</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/02/17/rhapsody-vs-itunes-which-is-better-and-why/#comment-666014</guid>
		<description>Two words:  customer support - I tried Rhapsody for a while, when I had problems customer service was close to not there.  What few problems I have had with iTunes were solved the same day with followups to see how the service was.

To me that means a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words:  customer support &#8211; I tried Rhapsody for a while, when I had problems customer service was close to not there.  What few problems I have had with iTunes were solved the same day with followups to see how the service was.</p>
<p>To me that means a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.406 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 471/475 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-15 20:30:46 -->
