Comments on: Outlook Evolution http://chris.pirillo.com/outlook-evolution/ News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Swimming in the Pensieve » Evolution on windozehttp://chris.pirillo.com/outlook-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-38426 Swimming in the Pensieve » Evolution on windoze Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:26:40 +0000 http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/24/outlook-evolution/#comment-38426 [...] “…I’m disappointed that Evolution for Win32 sports a nasty-ass UI. Of course, if Linux developers are trying to be more like Microsoft by making inconsistent and aesthetically-challenged interfaces, they’re succeeding. Here’s to hoping that Outlook 2007 won’t suck as much.” [...] [...] “…I’m disappointed that Evolution for Win32 sports a nasty-ass UI. Of course, if Linux developers are trying to be more like Microsoft by making inconsistent and aesthetically-challenged interfaces, they’re succeeding. Here’s to hoping that Outlook 2007 won’t suck as much.” [...]

]]> By: OffBeatMammal : The Outlook for Evolutionhttp://chris.pirillo.com/outlook-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-34194 OffBeatMammal : The Outlook for Evolution Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:23:39 +0000 http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/24/outlook-evolution/#comment-34194 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Well, turns out that in the long run I was right! Reading Chris Porillos (sometime acerbic but always amusing) blog I came across news of a workable port of Evolution to Windows that tidies up some of the idiosyncrasies of the official port (which had also escaped my attention - I've been playing with Outlook 2007 beta and not seen the need to keep hunting alternatives). Shame Evolution looks ugly but it's great to see the functionality is now here and stable. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Well, turns out that in the long run I was right! Reading Chris Porillos (sometime acerbic but always amusing) blog I came across news of a workable port of Evolution to Windows that tidies up some of the idiosyncrasies of the official port (which had also escaped my attention – I’ve been playing with Outlook 2007 beta and not seen the need to keep hunting alternatives). Shame Evolution looks ugly but it’s great to see the functionality is now here and stable. [...]

]]> By: bnaivarhttp://chris.pirillo.com/outlook-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32750 bnaivar Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:31:52 +0000 http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/24/outlook-evolution/#comment-32750 The only problem is that you have to learn how to use it all by yourself.Nobody can teach Evolution.(*BA-DOOM-CHEE*) The only problem is that you have to learn how to use it all by yourself.

Nobody can teach Evolution.

(*BA-DOOM-CHEE*)

]]> By: Bill Nadraszkyhttp://chris.pirillo.com/outlook-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-32544 Bill Nadraszky Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:02:12 +0000 http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/24/outlook-evolution/#comment-32544 I tried this a couple of months ago and I know this comment will get slammed but Chris, Evolution on Windows looks just like it does in Linux. In Linux it looks good, in Windows it looks bad.I wonder how it would look in the beautiful interface of a Mac (And I say that having never even owned a Mac).Anyway maybe we should get over the ugly and just take it for a good piece of software. I tried this a couple of months ago and I know this comment will get slammed but Chris, Evolution on Windows looks just like it does in Linux. In Linux it looks good, in Windows it looks bad.

I wonder how it would look in the beautiful interface of a Mac (And I say that having never even owned a Mac).

Anyway maybe we should get over the ugly and just take it for a good piece of software.

]]>