<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Onboard Sound vs Sound Cards</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Johnson</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-715967</link> <dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:07:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/21/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/#comment-715967</guid> <description>If you are into gaming, you might want to get the Creative Labs Audigy  2 Sound Card with EAX &quot;Enviromental audio extensions&quot; feature built in since a lot of games have EAX capablities for increase realism for sound.But, onboard is good for system sounds, movies and music.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are into gaming, you might want to get the Creative Labs Audigy  2 Sound Card with EAX &#8220;Enviromental audio extensions&#8221; feature built in since a lot of games have EAX capablities for increase realism for sound.</p><p>But, onboard is good for system sounds, movies and music.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Forbes</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-542240</link> <dc:creator>Alex Forbes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:50:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/21/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/#comment-542240</guid> <description>I use the Reaktek AC&#039;97 onboard audio controller on a recent high end ASUS board. I&#039;ve read elsewhere that the onboards may outperform some of the consumer audio boards. I hope so, because I&#039;ve aready recorded over 144GB of WAV from my CD&#039;s. I can&#039;t hear a difference between source CD and PC in play tests through midprice or high-end Klipsch.So the difference can&#039;t be powers of ten, but I always wonder. I know some onboard processors are or were really bad, and used to use Creative instead, but I found them and their drivers pretty high maintenance hardware.I pipe the Realtek audio out directly to good quality receivers, so I don&#039;t need or want the audio controls that come with some of the external USB audio processors. Do you and your readers feel I&#039;m selling my audio short? What expansion slot audio is recommended?Thanks -- Alex</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Reaktek AC&#8217;97 onboard audio controller on a recent high end ASUS board. I&#8217;ve read elsewhere that the onboards may outperform some of the consumer audio boards. I hope so, because I&#8217;ve aready recorded over 144GB of WAV from my CD&#8217;s. I can&#8217;t hear a difference between source CD and PC in play tests through midprice or high-end Klipsch.</p><p>So the difference can&#8217;t be powers of ten, but I always wonder. I know some onboard processors are or were really bad, and used to use Creative instead, but I found them and their drivers pretty high maintenance hardware.</p><p>I pipe the Realtek audio out directly to good quality receivers, so I don&#8217;t need or want the audio controls that come with some of the external USB audio processors. Do you and your readers feel I&#8217;m selling my audio short? What expansion slot audio is recommended?</p><p>Thanks &#8212; Alex</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-538083</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:18:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/21/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/#comment-538083</guid> <description>If you&#039;re an audiophile, you will notice a difference between onboard audio, and expansion slot audio. Bass sounds are more subdued from onboard, simply because the onboard audio system does not have as much power as the PCI bus does. For functionality, onboard serves its purpose but not much more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re an audiophile, you will notice a difference between onboard audio, and expansion slot audio. Bass sounds are more subdued from onboard, simply because the onboard audio system does not have as much power as the PCI bus does. For functionality, onboard serves its purpose but not much more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anonymous</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-534485</link> <dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/21/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/#comment-534485</guid> <description>I&#039;m using onboard right now but my preference is a card. If I could I&#039;d get a motherboard with just PS2 ports on it, no onboard anything else, but nobody seems to do that anymore.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using onboard right now but my preference is a card. If I could I&#8217;d get a motherboard with just PS2 ports on it, no onboard anything else, but nobody seems to do that anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anonymous</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-534486</link> <dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/21/onboard-sound-vs-sound-cards/#comment-534486</guid> <description>I&#039;m using onboard right now but my preference is a card. If I could I&#039;d get a motherboard with just PS2 ports on it, no onboard anything else, but nobody seems to do that anymore.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using onboard right now but my preference is a card. If I could I&#8217;d get a motherboard with just PS2 ports on it, no onboard anything else, but nobody seems to do that anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/27 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-24 13:40:49 -->