<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Okay, Maybe I&#8217;m the Idiot&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Matthew</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-515697</link> <dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:50:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-515697</guid> <description>Hey Chris,I was watching your video on youtube and i overherd you saying your a windows beta tester, i just wanted to know how do you sign up to be a beta tester. me and my family are somewhat computer geeks and i think we would be a big help.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris,</p><p>I was watching your video on youtube and i overherd you saying your a windows beta tester, i just wanted to know how do you sign up to be a beta tester. me and my family are somewhat computer geeks and i think we would be a big help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Someone</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-514863</link> <dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-514863</guid> <description>Yeah by 2.0 and that they mean framework (the .net framework) (i think). Eg im using the web 2.0 net framework, like you get the frameworks on your pc. The only difference between the frameworks is the like methods,fuctions, flexibility and so on. You would typically use web 2.0 in asp. Like 1.0 = asp, 2.0 =asp.net. 3.0 is probably also going to be asp.net i presume, well is i think. Basically this web 3.0 is just a web site application based on the net framework 3. Hey im still at school, and i know this, yes i need to get out more xD To be honest this 3.0 thing will be no different to 2.0, maybe just like few new fuctions but hey its all crap now what microsoft releases (nothing stable lol, look at vista i hate it - im formatting back to xp in few days , and i ordered premium version like £30 more instead of an upgrade on space for my dell ages ago!).From Rat - Google is your best friend, just dont date it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah by 2.0 and that they mean framework (the .net framework) (i think). Eg im using the web 2.0 net framework, like you get the frameworks on your pc. The only difference between the frameworks is the like methods,fuctions, flexibility and so on. You would typically use web 2.0 in asp. Like 1.0 = asp, 2.0 =asp.net. 3.0 is probably also going to be <a
href="http://asp.net" title="http://asp.net" target="_blank">asp.net</a> i presume, well is i think. Basically this web 3.0 is just a web site application based on the net framework 3. Hey im still at school, and i know this, yes i need to get out more xD To be honest this 3.0 thing will be no different to 2.0, maybe just like few new fuctions but hey its all crap now what microsoft releases (nothing stable lol, look at vista i hate it &#8211; im formatting back to xp in few days , and i ordered premium version like £30 more instead of an upgrade on space for my dell ages ago!).</p><p>From Rat &#8211; Google is your best friend, just dont date it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Enterprise 3.0: Where Is It Headed? - Interesting Panel with the Wrong Title&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-514450</link> <dc:creator>Enterprise 3.0: Where Is It Headed? - Interesting Panel with the Wrong Title&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:09:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-514450</guid> <description>[...] Additional reading: Open Gardens, Portals and KM,&#160;&#160;Anne Zelenka, Luis Suarez,&#160; the FASTForward Blog, Read/WriteWeb,&#160; Chris Pirillo,&#160; Fake Steve Jobs &#160;,&#160; just to name a few&#8230; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Additional reading: Open Gardens, Portals and KM,&nbsp;&nbsp;Anne Zelenka, Luis Suarez,&nbsp; the FASTForward Blog, Read/WriteWeb,&nbsp; Chris Pirillo,&nbsp; Fake Steve Jobs &nbsp;,&nbsp; just to name a few&#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kirk M</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-513529</link> <dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-513529</guid> <description>Hi Chris,Nope, I for one don&#039;t think your an idiot. The world is full of names for things that don&#039;t exist like any term or phrase that could be labeled as &quot;corp speak&quot; for example since anything &quot;corp speak relates to absolutely nothing. I have to agree that anything WEB 2.0 is the same with the slight possible exception of a way the layout/theme/skin of a new online or local program looks as in some of the &#039;Windows Live&#039; offerings and a few of the blog themes and templates out there. These can be said to have the WEB 2.0 &quot;look&quot; but only when used a a label for a type of appearance.I&#039;m definitely not going to touch anything that could be called WEB 3.0 but it will be interesting what &quot;they&quot; come up with that may fall into that category. If anything it&#039;s a good study in human behavior. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p><p>Nope, I for one don&#8217;t think your an idiot. The world is full of names for things that don&#8217;t exist like any term or phrase that could be labeled as &#8220;corp speak&#8221; for example since anything &#8220;corp speak relates to absolutely nothing. I have to agree that anything WEB 2.0 is the same with the slight possible exception of a way the layout/theme/skin of a new online or local program looks as in some of the &#8216;Windows Live&#8217; offerings and a few of the blog themes and templates out there. These can be said to have the WEB 2.0 &#8220;look&#8221; but only when used a a label for a type of appearance.</p><p>I&#8217;m definitely not going to touch anything that could be called WEB 3.0 but it will be interesting what &#8220;they&#8221; come up with that may fall into that category. If anything it&#8217;s a good study in human behavior. :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kevin</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-513198</link> <dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:37:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-513198</guid> <description>I agree with you, I wrote about web 2 and web mee:-http://london-to-la-rochelle.blogspot.com/2007/08/web-mee.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, I wrote about web 2 and web mee:-</p><p><a
href="http://london-to-la-rochelle.blogspot.com/2007/08/web-mee.html" rel="nofollow">http://london-to-la-rochelle.blogspot.com/2007/08/web-mee.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ilter</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-511309</link> <dc:creator>ilter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:35:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-511309</guid> <description>Web 2.0 has become just a marketing slogan for me.
I think the internet is all the time evolving, and some people like to use the benefit of technical mumbo-jumbo ([the term Web 2.0-lol] also for Mr.Jobs too, maybe? :), when there are millions of non-geek users who is not aware of whats going on.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 has become just a marketing slogan for me.<br
/> I think the internet is all the time evolving, and some people like to use the benefit of technical mumbo-jumbo ([the term Web 2.0-lol] also for Mr.Jobs too, maybe? :), when there are millions of non-geek users who is not aware of whats going on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ms. Wahala</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-510700</link> <dc:creator>Ms. Wahala</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-510700</guid> <description>The web would be a lot more boring if blogs didn&#039;t allow us to publish in the middle of being disgruntled - who wants to read a gruntled web?As far as terminology, I&#039;ve abandoned the idea that the term Web 2.0 will ever be used in a context that I agree with - there&#039;s too many chefs now. Sure, I&#039;d love to go with the original definition established by the folks who supposedly coined the term -- if everyone would actually use it the same way.And as you&#039;ve pointed out, they won&#039;t. Even the ones who are supposed to be more on top of these things than we are.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The web would be a lot more boring if blogs didn&#8217;t allow us to publish in the middle of being disgruntled &#8211; who wants to read a gruntled web?</p><p>As far as terminology, I&#8217;ve abandoned the idea that the term Web 2.0 will ever be used in a context that I agree with &#8211; there&#8217;s too many chefs now. Sure, I&#8217;d love to go with the original definition established by the folks who supposedly coined the term &#8212; if everyone would actually use it the same way.</p><p>And as you&#8217;ve pointed out, they won&#8217;t. Even the ones who are supposed to be more on top of these things than we are.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CraigC</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509631</link> <dc:creator>CraigC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:40:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509631</guid> <description>Historically, the whole Web 1.0, 2.0 thing is what MS saw happening back in the early 90&#039;s with Netscape - basically the browser supplanting the need for &quot;boxed&quot; software -- esp. Microsoft&#039;s. Hence the full-attack with &quot;free&quot; IE3 (remember, Navigator Gold was a boxed software that sold for around $30-$40 ---yikes!)Now, it&#039;s just really happening full steam.First, you had Netscape&#039;s built-in Composer for WYSIWYG web page creation, then a slew of web mail, calendars, contacts (who would need Outlook?) -- now you have full word processing, spreadsheet, presentation, image editing (Picnik, for example), CRM, accounting, ad infinitum --  the new version of Office &quot;whatever&quot; doesn&#039;t do you much good if you&#039;re 1,000 miles from home. As long as you have an OS, web access and a browser plus, say, a slew of Google Apps you can do biz from anywhere.Most people use a fraction --really -- of what most software is capable of, even web apps. This is and always will be what large software companies, in particular MS, are afraid of. That one day, the consumer at home and work will wake-up and realize they just don&#039;t need/use what XYZ company is offering, esp. at $150-$500 a pop! Economics 101 -- FUD no longer works.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historically, the whole Web 1.0, 2.0 thing is what MS saw happening back in the early 90&#8217;s with Netscape &#8211; basically the browser supplanting the need for &#8220;boxed&#8221; software &#8212; esp. Microsoft&#8217;s. Hence the full-attack with &#8220;free&#8221; IE3 (remember, Navigator Gold was a boxed software that sold for around $30-$40 &#8212;yikes!)</p><p>Now, it&#8217;s just really happening full steam.</p><p>First, you had Netscape&#8217;s built-in Composer for WYSIWYG web page creation, then a slew of web mail, calendars, contacts (who would need Outlook?) &#8212; now you have full word processing, spreadsheet, presentation, image editing (Picnik, for example), CRM, accounting, ad infinitum &#8212;  the new version of Office &#8220;whatever&#8221; doesn&#8217;t do you much good if you&#8217;re 1,000 miles from home. As long as you have an OS, web access and a browser plus, say, a slew of Google Apps you can do biz from anywhere.</p><p>Most people use a fraction &#8211;really &#8212; of what most software is capable of, even web apps. This is and always will be what large software companies, in particular MS, are afraid of. That one day, the consumer at home and work will wake-up and realize they just don&#8217;t need/use what XYZ company is offering, esp. at $150-$500 a pop! Economics 101 &#8212; FUD no longer works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zc456</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509572</link> <dc:creator>Zc456</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:28:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509572</guid> <description>*raises hand in agreement* I never understood the term, release, and the idea of Web 2.0. I didn&#039;t get it when it came out and I don&#039;t get it now.And thats was my 2 cents.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*raises hand in agreement* I never understood the term, release, and the idea of Web 2.0. I didn&#8217;t get it when it came out and I don&#8217;t get it now.</p><p>And thats was my 2 cents.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danny</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509570</link> <dc:creator>danny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:27:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509570</guid> <description>i tried to post this comment on youtube but i whouldnt let me because it exceeded 500 chars anywaymicrosoft should of thought about making drivers availible for people who have differnt OS&#039;s and they should of spent more time making it i know it costs loads of money its not comin out of my back pocket but people who go out and buy dont relise that when they do install windows vista it might not be compatible with there computer hardware (ect) to avoid all this because they have all ready released it they should think hard about the updates they want to be providing for peoples computers like as you said your scanner &quot;i think it was&quot; wasnt compatible with windows vista</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i tried to post this comment on youtube but i whouldnt let me because it exceeded 500 chars anyway</p><p>microsoft should of thought about making drivers availible for people who have differnt OS&#8217;s and they should of spent more time making it i know it costs loads of money its not comin out of my back pocket but people who go out and buy dont relise that when they do install windows vista it might not be compatible with there computer hardware (ect) to avoid all this because they have all ready released it they should think hard about the updates they want to be providing for peoples computers like as you said your scanner &#8220;i think it was&#8221; wasnt compatible with windows vista</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509335</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:36:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509335</guid> <description>Hey chris! dude,you need to relax when doing tech stuff and your blog.
when your wife needs help. take a break and help her. when you get angry. take a deep breath and sloowly let it out and count to 10.
Trust me. it helps. try it. and yes. things do break.
and your not stupid...bob,
brea ca.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey chris! dude,you need to relax when doing tech stuff and your blog.<br
/> when your wife needs help. take a break and help her. when you get angry. take a deep breath and sloowly let it out and count to 10.<br
/> Trust me. it helps. try it. and yes. things do break.<br
/> and your not stupid&#8230;</p><p>bob,<br
/> brea ca.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DBL</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509314</link> <dc:creator>DBL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:07:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509314</guid> <description>The guy on your last post about this who mentioned the XMLHTTPRequest which allows bits and pieces of web pages to be loaded as needed, was the most narrow and therefore accurate in his definition of &#039;Web 2.0&#039; -- because this is the only indispensable piece. Anything anyone else might add is something somebody else might want to subtract, but load-as-needed is really the underlying paradigm-changing technology that opens up a whole new world of web design, which includes (but doesn&#039;t require) all of the other things that people like to mention. (Unlike user customisation, which changes no paradigms, is just a line of BS from Microsoft.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy on your last post about this who mentioned the XMLHTTPRequest which allows bits and pieces of web pages to be loaded as needed, was the most narrow and therefore accurate in his definition of &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; &#8212; because this is the only indispensable piece. Anything anyone else might add is something somebody else might want to subtract, but load-as-needed is really the underlying paradigm-changing technology that opens up a whole new world of web design, which includes (but doesn&#8217;t require) all of the other things that people like to mention. (Unlike user customisation, which changes no paradigms, is just a line of BS from Microsoft.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Levi Figueira</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509300</link> <dc:creator>Levi Figueira</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:49:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509300</guid> <description>Try watching this video os Eric Schmidt when asked on &quot;what is web3.0&quot;.
He makes a good point on both web2.0 and web3.0. :)http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/eric_schmidt_defines_web_30.phpHave fun!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try watching this video os Eric Schmidt when asked on &#8220;what is web3.0&#8243;.<br
/> He makes a good point on both web2.0 and web3.0. :)</p><p><a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/eric_schmidt_defines_web_30.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/eric_schmidt_defines_web_30.php</a></p><p>Have fun!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dataore</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509150</link> <dc:creator>dataore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509150</guid> <description>Shouldn&#039;t any web x-point-anything come with the yellow-triangle-construction-sign, subtitled &quot;Work in Progress&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t any web x-point-anything come with the yellow-triangle-construction-sign, subtitled &#8220;Work in Progress&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Davidson</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-509091</link> <dc:creator>Mark Davidson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/08/okay-maybe-im-the-idiot/#comment-509091</guid> <description>Er, I was drunk when I wrote that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, I was drunk when I wrote that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-23 15:34:40 -->