<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No New Firefox Before the End of the Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Anderson</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737715</guid>
		<description>I use Chrome now. I gave up on FireFox on OS X. It loads slow. Runs slow. Quits super slow, if at all. And it&#039;s a clusterfreak of a UI. Chrome actually feels like a Mac product on OS X and a Windows product on Windows. Not a Windows product badly ported to OS X like FireFox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Chrome now. I gave up on FireFox on OS X. It loads slow. Runs slow. Quits super slow, if at all. And it&#8217;s a clusterfreak of a UI. Chrome actually feels like a Mac product on OS X and a Windows product on Windows. Not a Windows product badly ported to OS X like FireFox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shock2k8 (Will be known as Shock2k10 in 2010)</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737323</link>
		<dc:creator>Shock2k8 (Will be known as Shock2k10 in 2010)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737323</guid>
		<description>I never use anything but Firefox unless I am forced to use Internet Explorer which makes me really angry when it happens. Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never use anything but Firefox unless I am forced to use Internet Explorer which makes me really angry when it happens. Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737282</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737282</guid>
		<description>I use Google Chrome because of its fast start-up time, stability, and simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Google Chrome because of its fast start-up time, stability, and simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOGESH PAWAR</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737270</link>
		<dc:creator>YOGESH PAWAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737270</guid>
		<description>yes we have all seen the disaster&#039;s of vista fortunately i have the same old window&#039;s xp for now so i have time to think aobut changing to new window&#039;s &amp; yes... I&#039;ll be happy to wait as i am a Firefox user and the plug-ins makes them really so special it&#039;s a good decision mozilla has taken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes we have all seen the disaster&#8217;s of vista fortunately i have the same old window&#8217;s xp for now so i have time to think aobut changing to new window&#8217;s &amp; yes&#8230; I&#8217;ll be happy to wait as i am a Firefox user and the plug-ins makes them really so special it&#8217;s a good decision mozilla has taken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Berg</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737253</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737253</guid>
		<description>Being a Mac user, I&#039;m not overly thrilled with FireFox.  It&#039;s slow and clunky, at least from my experience, on the Mac.  I would rather run Safari as it&#039;s smooth and quick.

That said, I do keep a copy of FireFox around for once-in-a-blue-moon use when a site doesn&#039;t like Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a Mac user, I&#8217;m not overly thrilled with FireFox.  It&#8217;s slow and clunky, at least from my experience, on the Mac.  I would rather run Safari as it&#8217;s smooth and quick.</p>
<p>That said, I do keep a copy of FireFox around for once-in-a-blue-moon use when a site doesn&#8217;t like Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737190</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737190</guid>
		<description>I admit it; I&#039;m a google addict and as such the only browser I use is Chrome. It&#039;s super quick when launching and does exactly what it&#039;s supposed to do. I still have the occasional &quot;oh snap&quot; and &quot;dns errors&quot; and have to refresh the page to get the site to come in but my browser experience has improved over the past few months. I know Chrome doesn&#039;t have all of the plugins/extensions but to be honest when I was using firefox all I installed was the weather extension and that was it. Almost all websites appear great in Chrome and Chrome is rapidly gaining acceptance throughout the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit it; I&#8217;m a google addict and as such the only browser I use is Chrome. It&#8217;s super quick when launching and does exactly what it&#8217;s supposed to do. I still have the occasional &#8220;oh snap&#8221; and &#8220;dns errors&#8221; and have to refresh the page to get the site to come in but my browser experience has improved over the past few months. I know Chrome doesn&#8217;t have all of the plugins/extensions but to be honest when I was using firefox all I installed was the weather extension and that was it. Almost all websites appear great in Chrome and Chrome is rapidly gaining acceptance throughout the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manda (psp365 / mandasjewelry)</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737173</link>
		<dc:creator>Manda (psp365 / mandasjewelry)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737173</guid>
		<description>I agree they should be more like apple and only release an application when it&#039;s perfected. We would have more happy people that way. It&#039;s worth the wait rather than screwing up what&#039;s already working great and making it more buggy before it&#039;s ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree they should be more like apple and only release an application when it&#8217;s perfected. We would have more happy people that way. It&#8217;s worth the wait rather than screwing up what&#8217;s already working great and making it more buggy before it&#8217;s ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737161</guid>
		<description>Right now FF 3.5.6 works perfectly fine and I can wait for 3.6 until next year. And I really appreciate the ad-ons that block all the ads and flash gizmos. What a pain they can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now FF 3.5.6 works perfectly fine and I can wait for 3.6 until next year. And I really appreciate the ad-ons that block all the ads and flash gizmos. What a pain they can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arenlor</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/no-new-firefox-before-the-end-of-the-year/#comment-737157</link>
		<dc:creator>Arenlor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=16840#comment-737157</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using the Beta, and I&#039;ve yet to encounter any bugs. I don&#039;t know what they&#039;re waiting for. It is a bit faster than 3.5 I must say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the Beta, and I&#8217;ve yet to encounter any bugs. I don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re waiting for. It is a bit faster than 3.5 I must say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.288 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 405/409 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-17 00:22:41 -->
