<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New MSN Search Beta URLs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-559947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2004/11/11/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-559947</guid>
		<description>Gear up for grub with a tripleheader of pigskin, including a meeting of brothers in Dallas. Everybody knows it&#039;s been a rough year for her, but find out who else had issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gear up for grub with a tripleheader of pigskin, including a meeting of brothers in Dallas. Everybody knows it&#8217;s been a rough year for her, but find out who else had issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15639</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2004/11/11/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15639</guid>
		<description>The old MSN search produces better results than this desperate attempt at preventing Google.com from getting too superior.
And a blog, just like Google?  What&#039;s with the &quot;we have been listening to what you&#039;ve had to say about our TechPreview&quot;?  Since when has Microsoft given a damn about what people want?  Only when there&#039;s something to gain from it, that&#039;s the answer.  
Usually Microsoft has an &quot;I don&#039;t care what you &#039;want&#039;&quot; attitude, or a dismissive &quot;Everybody is happy with what we offer, they don&#039;t want anything better&quot; attitude, such as this:
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_3-5448719.html
&lt;strong&gt;&quot;I don&#039;t believe it is a true statement that IE doesn&#039;t have the features that our customers want,&quot; he said. &quot;We take user feedback very seriously. If you have that feedback, then you should feed it back to us because we will feed it to the product team.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
What a pile of crap.  I know many people who would never part from Windows or IE, but they would love many of the features that other browsers have.  I&#039;m sure that Mr. Pirillo here would acknowledge that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old MSN search produces better results than this desperate attempt at preventing Google.com from getting too superior.<br />
And a blog, just like Google?  What&#39;s with the &#8220;we have been listening to what you&#39;ve had to say about our TechPreview&#8221;?  Since when has Microsoft given a damn about what people want?  Only when there&#39;s something to gain from it, that&#39;s the answer.<br />
Usually Microsoft has an &#8220;I don&#39;t care what you &#39;want&#39;&#8221; attitude, or a dismissive &#8220;Everybody is happy with what we offer, they don&#39;t want anything better&#8221; attitude, such as this:<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_3-5448719.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_3-5448719.html</a><br />
<strong>&#8220;I don&#39;t believe it is a true statement that IE doesn&#39;t have the features that our customers want,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We take user feedback very seriously. If you have that feedback, then you should feed it back to us because we will feed it to the product team.&#8221;</strong><br />
What a pile of crap.  I know many people who would never part from Windows or IE, but they would love many of the features that other browsers have.  I&#39;m sure that Mr. Pirillo here would acknowledge that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15638</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2004/11/11/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15638</guid>
		<description>I doubt MS will overtake Google, but they can try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt MS will overtake Google, but they can try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15637</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2004/11/11/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15637</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris, just wanted to say hey and i&#039;m glad you&#039;re doing well!  i read ur blog everyday.  and if microsoft does come out with a decent search, i don&#039; t think i would use it anyway.  google always pwns in my heart!  http://louiesblog.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris, just wanted to say hey and i&#39;m glad you&#39;re doing well!  i read ur blog everyday.  and if microsoft does come out with a decent search, i don&#39; t think i would use it anyway.  google always pwns in my heart!  <a href="http://louiesblog.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://louiesblog.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2004/11/11/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15636</guid>
		<description>And this is better than Google because, uh, why?
Seems like a clone, but without the chance of a funny title GIF on holidays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is better than Google because, uh, why?<br />
Seems like a clone, but without the chance of a funny title GIF on holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15635</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2004/11/11/new-msn-search-beta-urls/#comment-15635</guid>
		<description>This site is temporarily unavailable, please check back soon.
Wish they&#039;d check it before announcing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is temporarily unavailable, please check back soon.<br />
Wish they&#39;d check it before announcing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.283 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 372/376 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-15 16:17:14 -->
