<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: The Mac Sucks - More Leopard Insecurity</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-655714</link> <dc:creator>The Mac Sucks - More Leopard Insecurity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:04:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-655714</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Pirillo points out a number of UI inconsistencies and issues in Leopard in his [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pirillo points out a number of UI inconsistencies and issues in Leopard in his [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ex2bot</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-555917</link> <dc:creator>ex2bot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-555917</guid> <description>Todd V: With the save dialog, have you tried pressing the triangle button next to the &quot;Save As:&quot; text box? This should shrink the sheet (the save dialog). The next time you click this button, it should enlarge the sheet again but not so long that it is off the bottom of the screen.As for your Finder window issue, I&#039;m not sure this will help at all, but you can set custom grid spacing. Open the window you want to space differently, and press Command (Apple key) - J. This is not automatic, of course. But at least you can set frequently accessed windows.Bot</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd V: With the save dialog, have you tried pressing the triangle button next to the &#8220;Save As:&#8221; text box? This should shrink the sheet (the save dialog). The next time you click this button, it should enlarge the sheet again but not so long that it is off the bottom of the screen.</p><p>As for your Finder window issue, I&#8217;m not sure this will help at all, but you can set custom grid spacing. Open the window you want to space differently, and press Command (Apple key) &#8211; J. This is not automatic, of course. But at least you can set frequently accessed windows.</p><p>Bot</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Todd V</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-553987</link> <dc:creator>Todd V</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:24:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-553987</guid> <description>Yes. And how about adding a couple more:(1) Saving dialog screens scrolling past the dock where you can no longer see the buttons. Try saving a script in Script Editor, for example, on a 13&quot; Macbook.(2) Custom icons for folders that used to serve as reminders for you now no longer show in the dock -- just a stack of the documents inside.(3) How about advancing to the 22nd century by making the spacing of finder windows or saving files windows actually &quot;auto configure&quot; to the size of the file names in those folders? I&#039;ve had a save-file-in-which-location-screen pop up in the center of my screen the size of a YouTube video. There is no screen size that small. It just makes more sense to auto-configure these things based on the user&#039;s primary screen size or the length of the file names -- rather than having to scroll the columns to the right -- every time! -- just to see the names of the files.Just my two cents.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. And how about adding a couple more:</p><p>(1) Saving dialog screens scrolling past the dock where you can no longer see the buttons. Try saving a script in Script Editor, for example, on a 13&#8243; Macbook.</p><p>(2) Custom icons for folders that used to serve as reminders for you now no longer show in the dock &#8212; just a stack of the documents inside.</p><p>(3) How about advancing to the 22nd century by making the spacing of finder windows or saving files windows actually &#8220;auto configure&#8221; to the size of the file names in those folders? I&#8217;ve had a save-file-in-which-location-screen pop up in the center of my screen the size of a YouTube video. There is no screen size that small. It just makes more sense to auto-configure these things based on the user&#8217;s primary screen size or the length of the file names &#8212; rather than having to scroll the columns to the right &#8212; every time! &#8212; just to see the names of the files.</p><p>Just my two cents.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil Anderson</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-552026</link> <dc:creator>Neil Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:48:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-552026</guid> <description>Minimum system requirement for Leopard is G4 867MHz. RAM minimum 512MB. DVD drive and 9GB free disk space.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimum system requirement for Leopard is G4 867MHz. RAM minimum 512MB. DVD drive and 9GB free disk space.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-551897</link> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:41:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-551897</guid> <description>&quot;Would it work OK on an 512mb intel mini for instance?&quot;Sure. It works on any recent PPC Mac, so no Intel user is going to be unable to run it. It&#039;s running fine for me on my G4 Mac Mini. I did up the RAM to 1 GB some time ago, though, and that&#039;s just as well: IIRC, Leopard does require a minimum of 512 MB.Good piece, Chris. Leopard is a very nice OS, but, though UI inconsistency is perhaps a minor thing, it has to be said that Leopard is still too inconsistent even though it is a step in the right direction.I think the stopwatch is some horrible holdover from the awful old Mac OS. iTunes is definitely a port from the pre-Unix-based OS X and is written with the Carbon toolkit not the more modern Cocoa. However, iTunes doesn&#039;t necessarily have the oldest UI in all respects. It has more frequent releases than other applications -- perhaps because of its multiple and cross-platform functions -- and it looks to me like Apple tries out new looks on it first. The rather subfusc scroll-bars appeared in iTunes first, but have now appeared in iPhoto. They may possibly be in the latest iterations in some of the other &quot;i apps&quot;, too. (I don&#039;t know, because I haven&#039;t installed them all.)Making the toolbar-background consistent was good, but Apple should decide which scroll-bars they want, too, and standardize the toolbar button style, as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Would it work OK on an 512mb intel mini for instance?&#8221;</p><p>Sure. It works on any recent PPC Mac, so no Intel user is going to be unable to run it. It&#8217;s running fine for me on my G4 Mac Mini. I did up the RAM to 1 GB some time ago, though, and that&#8217;s just as well: IIRC, Leopard does require a minimum of 512 MB.</p><p>Good piece, Chris. Leopard is a very nice OS, but, though UI inconsistency is perhaps a minor thing, it has to be said that Leopard is still too inconsistent even though it is a step in the right direction.</p><p>I think the stopwatch is some horrible holdover from the awful old Mac OS. iTunes is definitely a port from the pre-Unix-based OS X and is written with the Carbon toolkit not the more modern Cocoa. However, iTunes doesn&#8217;t necessarily have the oldest UI in all respects. It has more frequent releases than other applications &#8212; perhaps because of its multiple and cross-platform functions &#8212; and it looks to me like Apple tries out new looks on it first. The rather subfusc scroll-bars appeared in iTunes first, but have now appeared in iPhoto. They may possibly be in the latest iterations in some of the other &#8220;i apps&#8221;, too. (I don&#8217;t know, because I haven&#8217;t installed them all.)</p><p>Making the toolbar-background consistent was good, but Apple should decide which scroll-bars they want, too, and standardize the toolbar button style, as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jnicita</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-551732</link> <dc:creator>jnicita</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:49:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-551732</guid> <description>to the user who cant find his network mappings on the desktop. Same thing to me, but all I did was goto finder, then preferences and general, and click the box show network servers on desktop. Checked it and all my mappings created via my auto logon appeared. Simple as that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to the user who cant find his network mappings on the desktop. Same thing to me, but all I did was goto finder, then preferences and general, and click the box show network servers on desktop. Checked it and all my mappings created via my auto logon appeared. Simple as that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mac OS X Leopard &#171; Down Under Digital Goes to Mars</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-551592</link> <dc:creator>Mac OS X Leopard &#171; Down Under Digital Goes to Mars</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-551592</guid> <description>[...] Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies ~ Chris Pirillo [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies ~ Chris Pirillo [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ckrantz</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-551570</link> <dc:creator>ckrantz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:52:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-551570</guid> <description>What&#039;s the hardware req if you don&#039;t have the latest and greatest of mac computers? Would it work OK on an 512mb intel mini for instance?One of many problems with vista was that you basically needed all new hardware.I&#039;m one of many doing the transfer to OSX  from windows. When the last windows machine dies so does windows in my house.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the hardware req if you don&#8217;t have the latest and greatest of mac computers? Would it work OK on an 512mb intel mini for instance?</p><p>One of many problems with vista was that you basically needed all new hardware.</p><p>I&#8217;m one of many doing the transfer to OSX  from windows. When the last windows machine dies so does windows in my house.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian McLaughlin</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-551569</link> <dc:creator>Ian McLaughlin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:50:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-551569</guid> <description>I&#039;m still a little bit confused about the way network drives are handled.  I have a SMB share that I auto-mount with some AppleScript whenever I start up.  There&#039;s no icon for the drive on the desktop any more.  It&#039;s not in the finder either, but yet the path is still there and I can access the files.  The finder shows the base machine on the left-hand side in the finder.  If I click on it, I can see all of the shares on that device, including the one I&#039;m connected to.  Is anyone else seeing this changed behaviour?  Am I doing something wrong?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still a little bit confused about the way network drives are handled.  I have a SMB share that I auto-mount with some AppleScript whenever I start up.  There&#8217;s no icon for the drive on the desktop any more.  It&#8217;s not in the finder either, but yet the path is still there and I can access the files.  The finder shows the base machine on the left-hand side in the finder.  If I click on it, I can see all of the shares on that device, including the one I&#8217;m connected to.  Is anyone else seeing this changed behaviour?  Am I doing something wrong?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Apple Fan Blog</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-662366</link> <dc:creator>Apple Fan Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-662366</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;read more…&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read more…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MyAppleMenu : Conversations In The Apple Community</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-564436</link> <dc:creator>MyAppleMenu : Conversations In The Apple Community</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-564436</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistenciesby Chris Pirillo  Despite numerous user interface inconsistencies, I&#039;m still largely impressed with Leopard.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistenciesby Chris Pirillo  Despite numerous user interface inconsistencies, I&#8217;m still largely impressed with Leopard.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bwana</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-564435</link> <dc:creator>Bwana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-564435</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;[IMG Video thumbnail. Click to play] Click To Play iPhone/iPod Touch users click here    iChat  SinceChris Pirillogot his copy of Leopard installed, I convinced him to help me test out iChat theatre. We were both highly impressed with the Photo Booth effects, File sharing and more importantly, screen sharing. Although the video quality was not stellar, we both&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[IMG Video thumbnail. Click to play] Click To Play iPhone/iPod Touch users click here    iChat  SinceChris Pirillogot his copy of Leopard installed, I convinced him to help me test out iChat theatre. We were both highly impressed with the Photo Booth effects, File sharing and more importantly, screen sharing. Although the video quality was not stellar, we both</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By:  istartedsomething</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-689148</link> <dc:creator> istartedsomething</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-689148</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;One of the first requests I received after launching the Windows UX Taskforce was “when can you make one for Mac OS X”. This came at a surprise to me because I didn’t know OS X had user experience flaws, butapparently it didand still do. Having said that today I’m proud to launch Aqua Taskforce, a taskforce site for Apple users to submit, vote and comment on OS X user experience quirks.  Windows UX Taskforce has also been renamed to&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the first requests I received after launching the Windows UX Taskforce was “when can you make one for Mac OS X”. This came at a surprise to me because I didn’t know OS X had user experience flaws, butapparently it didand still do. Having said that today I’m proud to launch Aqua Taskforce, a taskforce site for Apple users to submit, vote and comment on OS X user experience quirks.  Windows UX Taskforce has also been renamed to</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clipotech</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-564434</link> <dc:creator>Clipotech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-564434</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;The latest incarnation of OS X adds a new feature that widget fans will find useful: web widgets. Web widgets…Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest incarnation of OS X adds a new feature that widget fans will find useful: web widgets. Web widgets…Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: freestylo.co.uk</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/comment-page-1/#comment-564437</link> <dc:creator>freestylo.co.uk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/27/mac-os-x-leopard-ui-inconsistencies/#comment-564437</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Chriscreated an interesting post today on Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies Here’s a short outline Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies  When I was asked by Jim Allchin to go through Vista betas with a fine-toothed comb, I did - and I knew my feedback&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chriscreated an interesting post today on Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies Here’s a short outline Mac OS X Leopard UI Inconsistencies  When I was asked by Jim Allchin to go through Vista betas with a fine-toothed comb, I did &#8211; and I knew my feedback</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.026 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-24 11:46:42 -->