<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Longhorn Aero&#8230; No!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17282</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 05:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17282</guid>
		<description>Longhorn has the best looking recycle bin IMHO though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Longhorn has the best looking recycle bin IMHO though ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17281</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17281</guid>
		<description>Well Aero isn&#039;t included in the Alpha&#039;s Microsoft says that they won&#039;t introduce Aero until the last Beta for testing. What I don&#039;t understand is if you were at WinHec how come you didn&#039;t know this wasn&#039;t Aero unless maybe you weren&#039;t paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Aero isn&#39;t included in the Alpha&#39;s Microsoft says that they won&#39;t introduce Aero until the last Beta for testing. What I don&#39;t understand is if you were at WinHec how come you didn&#39;t know this wasn&#39;t Aero unless maybe you weren&#39;t paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17280</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 05:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17280</guid>
		<description>The look of the UI in that build is horrible, but it&#039;s not nearly as horrible as the &quot;design&quot; and &quot;usability&quot; of this site. Yikes! Your site redefines ugly!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The look of the UI in that build is horrible, but it&#39;s not nearly as horrible as the &#8220;design&#8221; and &#8220;usability&#8221; of this site. Yikes! Your site redefines ugly!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kindorf</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17279</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kindorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17279</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the multi-posts - your server was timing-out with a &quot;maintenance&quot; message.
Please refrain from flames</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the multi-posts &#8211; your server was timing-out with a &#8220;maintenance&#8221; message.<br />
Please refrain from flames</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kindorf</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17278</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kindorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17278</guid>
		<description>Chris - it was a pleasure meeting you at the x64 Launch - and you&#039;re absolutely right about the whole deal with the Aero UI issues; however (and I hate to sound like an utter ass for saying this), this is far from being the complete deal.
I did like the way the folders function, and the meta-tag capabilities for folder objects. WinFX is looking nice, but *dang*, Microsoft - get some decent graphics UI people working on the UI for goodness sakes. People like eye-candy, and geeknoids doubly-so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; it was a pleasure meeting you at the x64 Launch &#8211; and you&#39;re absolutely right about the whole deal with the Aero UI issues; however (and I hate to sound like an utter ass for saying this), this is far from being the complete deal.<br />
I did like the way the folders function, and the meta-tag capabilities for folder objects. WinFX is looking nice, but *dang*, Microsoft &#8211; get some decent graphics UI people working on the UI for goodness sakes. People like eye-candy, and geeknoids doubly-so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kindorf</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17277</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kindorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17277</guid>
		<description>Chris - it was a pleasure meeting you at the x64 Launch - and you&#039;re absolutely right about the whole deal with the Aero UI issues; however (and I hate to sound like an utter ass for saying this), this is far from being the final deal, as you said.
I did like the way the folders function, and the meta-tag capabilities for folder objects. WinFX is looking nice, but *dang*, Microsoft - get some decent graphics UI people working on the UI for goodness sakes. People like eye-candy, and geeknoids doubly-so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; it was a pleasure meeting you at the x64 Launch &#8211; and you&#39;re absolutely right about the whole deal with the Aero UI issues; however (and I hate to sound like an utter ass for saying this), this is far from being the final deal, as you said.<br />
I did like the way the folders function, and the meta-tag capabilities for folder objects. WinFX is looking nice, but *dang*, Microsoft &#8211; get some decent graphics UI people working on the UI for goodness sakes. People like eye-candy, and geeknoids doubly-so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kindorf</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17276</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kindorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17276</guid>
		<description>Chris - it was a pleasure meeting you at the x64 Launch - and you&#039;re absolutely right about the whole deal with the Aero UI issues; however (and I hate to sound like an utter ass for saying this), this is far from being the final deal, as you said.
I did like the way the folders function, and the meta-tag capabilities for folder objects. WinFX is looking nice, but *dang*, Microsoft - get some decent graphics UI people working on the UI for goodness sakes. People like eye-candy, and geeknoids doubly-so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; it was a pleasure meeting you at the x64 Launch &#8211; and you&#39;re absolutely right about the whole deal with the Aero UI issues; however (and I hate to sound like an utter ass for saying this), this is far from being the final deal, as you said.<br />
I did like the way the folders function, and the meta-tag capabilities for folder objects. WinFX is looking nice, but *dang*, Microsoft &#8211; get some decent graphics UI people working on the UI for goodness sakes. People like eye-candy, and geeknoids doubly-so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17275</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17275</guid>
		<description>Hopefully they don&#039;t get rid of the Windows Classic look :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully they don&#39;t get rid of the Windows Classic look :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piratinghacker</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17274</link>
		<dc:creator>piratinghacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17274</guid>
		<description>i just threw up...
Damn, now i have to clean my screen!  thanks MS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just threw up&#8230;<br />
Damn, now i have to clean my screen!  thanks MS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Paddock</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17273</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Paddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17273</guid>
		<description>And you have to admit, the Search stuff they showed during Bill&#039;s keynote is very slick (clearly the Tesla work is being put to use).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you have to admit, the Search stuff they showed during Bill&#39;s keynote is very slick (clearly the Tesla work is being put to use).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Paddock</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17272</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Paddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17272</guid>
		<description>That is NOT Aero.  Not even close.  
This release is to let hardware engineers design drivers for LDDM, Metro, and WS-Discover.
This release is still using the XP taskbar and the same theme engine.  There is a basic DWM demo included but that&#039;s it.  This theme was thrown together by some software developer (ie NOT an Aero designer) as a placeholder so that you could tell it wasn&#039;t *just* XP.
You will not see any of the Aero interface until Beta 2 next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is NOT Aero.  Not even close.<br />
This release is to let hardware engineers design drivers for LDDM, Metro, and WS-Discover.<br />
This release is still using the XP taskbar and the same theme engine.  There is a basic DWM demo included but that&#39;s it.  This theme was thrown together by some software developer (ie NOT an Aero designer) as a placeholder so that you could tell it wasn&#39;t *just* XP.<br />
You will not see any of the Aero interface until Beta 2 next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17271</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17271</guid>
		<description>Hammer meet nail. I&#039;m sure they have something better. I hope.
-Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hammer meet nail. I&#39;m sure they have something better. I hope.<br />
-Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17270</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17270</guid>
		<description>Thats crap 
They had all this time -and they  did nothing  
But i&#039;ve learnd not to expect much from M$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats crap<br />
They had all this time -and they  did nothing<br />
But i&#39;ve learnd not to expect much from M$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chefelf</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17269</link>
		<dc:creator>Chefelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2005/04/25/longhorn-aero-no/#comment-17269</guid>
		<description>I think their real problem is clinging to this basic design which goes back to Windows 95.  The basic architecture of the desktop is pretty much the same and that&#039;s fine and dandy for all people resistant to any form of change.  Personally I&#039;d rather see a major innovation in the desktop experience even if that means a month or two of being a little uncomfortable.
We&#039;ll get used to it.  And after the initial complaint sesison by users the PC world will be better for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think their real problem is clinging to this basic design which goes back to Windows 95.  The basic architecture of the desktop is pretty much the same and that&#39;s fine and dandy for all people resistant to any form of change.  Personally I&#39;d rather see a major innovation in the desktop experience even if that means a month or two of being a little uncomfortable.<br />
We&#39;ll get used to it.  And after the initial complaint sesison by users the PC world will be better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.323 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 460/464 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-16 07:19:52 -->
