<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Linux Sucks</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-728335</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:25:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-728335</guid> <description>Honestly, I love Linux software and all... I love gnome, really... way better than the Windows experience.However, the hardware fails miserably under Linux. I&#039;m on an ancient ICH-4 laptop, using a Pentium M CPU (Dothan 1.7).I *need* undervolt. On Windows, it&#039;s a 5 min task with RmClock. On Linux, it&#039;s ridiculous... rebuild kernel, patch, download driver, load module, configuration (text-only, argh)... then you do some magic voodoo on the command line praying for it to work.And it&#039;s *old* hardware, 5-6 years old.I don&#039;t even need to add *no* newer hardware of mine works (DSLR camera, camcorder etc. etc.).Really, the lack of hardware support is killing it, like it&#039;s not dead enough already LOL!I&#039;m on Ubuntu 9.10 just now. Loving it, but with a hot hot laptop, so let me go back to the viruses, please! :-P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I love Linux software and all&#8230; I love gnome, really&#8230; way better than the Windows experience.</p><p>However, the hardware fails miserably under Linux. I&#8217;m on an ancient ICH-4 laptop, using a Pentium M CPU (Dothan 1.7).</p><p>I *need* undervolt. On Windows, it&#8217;s a 5 min task with RmClock. On Linux, it&#8217;s ridiculous&#8230; rebuild kernel, patch, download driver, load module, configuration (text-only, argh)&#8230; then you do some magic voodoo on the command line praying for it to work.</p><p>And it&#8217;s *old* hardware, 5-6 years old.</p><p>I don&#8217;t even need to add *no* newer hardware of mine works (DSLR camera, camcorder etc. etc.).</p><p>Really, the lack of hardware support is killing it, like it&#8217;s not dead enough already LOL!</p><p>I&#8217;m on Ubuntu 9.10 just now. Loving it, but with a hot hot laptop, so let me go back to the viruses, please! :-P</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-726366</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:57:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-726366</guid> <description>My problems with linux have nothing to do with the operating system itself.
It has to do with a community full of jackasses that would rather spend 20 minutes telling you how stupid you are than spend 2 minutes telling you how to solve your problem.
That combined with the fact that after months of trying and patiently trying to gleam a tiny bit of help out of said community I can not get linux to maintain a properly wireless connection.As much as I hate MS myself, I will be forced to stick with them until they can push a linux distro that doesn&#039;t require 6 months of reading and learning just to install a update or driver properly.There is also the continued lack of gaming support.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problems with linux have nothing to do with the operating system itself.<br
/> It has to do with a community full of jackasses that would rather spend 20 minutes telling you how stupid you are than spend 2 minutes telling you how to solve your problem.<br
/> That combined with the fact that after months of trying and patiently trying to gleam a tiny bit of help out of said community I can not get linux to maintain a properly wireless connection.</p><p>As much as I hate MS myself, I will be forced to stick with them until they can push a linux distro that doesn&#8217;t require 6 months of reading and learning just to install a update or driver properly.</p><p>There is also the continued lack of gaming support.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emre</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-725898</link> <dc:creator>Emre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:29:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-725898</guid> <description>I really wanted to like Linux. I happily use Windows on a daily basis and love the fact that even though sometimes things don&#039;t work, the solution can be found within the first two Google results if you know how to search. My experience with Linux, however, has never been that easy to solve. My first attempt 5 years ago ended fast simply because the installation did not work. Although I am on the geekier side and do like troubleshooting, I had other things to troubleshoot with higher priority so I quit. I went back in a few months and was happy to see that  I was able to install! A new thing to play with, after all!Excitement did not last long since the wireless card did not work. Now that&#039;s a serious issue... Not because the card doesn&#039;t work, but because releasing a software to production and marketing it as &quot;Most user friendly Linux distribution&quot; is simply not OK if you cannot automatically recognize a wireless card in a 2 year old brand name laptop. Troubleshooting gets really annoying if I have to troubleshoot a very simple thing.This break was longer. I didn&#039;t touch any Linux distro for about 3 years (except at work a few times where I had to test stuff)... I decided to give a try to Fedora when XP started acting funky on my Laptop (not my main machine for work). I decided to do Fedora instead of reloading XP and be forced to use it at least for night time browsing. I did, and I even liked it. I still had to troubleshoot stuff but wasn&#039;t too bad. This was until yesterday which is when open office stopped working. The icon would just jump for a while when I try to launch it and then disappear being tired of jumping. I Googled a little bit with not much luck so I decided to uninstall it and give Go-oo a try instead. I got a message - &quot;Unable to remove, a dependency is missing&quot;.What? I am trying to friggin uninstall an application. Who cares if the dependency is missing? That stupid dependency is probably why my icon keeps jumping and not launch and I am stuck with it even when I try uninstalling. I am sure there is a logical explanation why it cannot be uninstalled without that dependency, but come on!I think I am quitting again and this time it may be for longer, as I write these lines from my fresh Windows 7 installation. Sorry to say as I am really for Open Source and the community, but Windows 7 answers my daily needs much better than Linux does. And don&#039;t bring the &quot;free&quot; thing please, I earn my bread out of this device and don&#039;t mind paying a couple hundered bucks every 3-4 years or so for upgrading.Why nobody complains about cars getting old?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wanted to like Linux. I happily use Windows on a daily basis and love the fact that even though sometimes things don&#8217;t work, the solution can be found within the first two Google results if you know how to search. My experience with Linux, however, has never been that easy to solve. My first attempt 5 years ago ended fast simply because the installation did not work. Although I am on the geekier side and do like troubleshooting, I had other things to troubleshoot with higher priority so I quit. I went back in a few months and was happy to see that  I was able to install! A new thing to play with, after all!</p><p>Excitement did not last long since the wireless card did not work. Now that&#8217;s a serious issue&#8230; Not because the card doesn&#8217;t work, but because releasing a software to production and marketing it as &#8220;Most user friendly Linux distribution&#8221; is simply not OK if you cannot automatically recognize a wireless card in a 2 year old brand name laptop. Troubleshooting gets really annoying if I have to troubleshoot a very simple thing.</p><p>This break was longer. I didn&#8217;t touch any Linux distro for about 3 years (except at work a few times where I had to test stuff)&#8230; I decided to give a try to Fedora when XP started acting funky on my Laptop (not my main machine for work). I decided to do Fedora instead of reloading XP and be forced to use it at least for night time browsing. I did, and I even liked it. I still had to troubleshoot stuff but wasn&#8217;t too bad. This was until yesterday which is when open office stopped working. The icon would just jump for a while when I try to launch it and then disappear being tired of jumping. I Googled a little bit with not much luck so I decided to uninstall it and give Go-oo a try instead. I got a message &#8211; &#8220;Unable to remove, a dependency is missing&#8221;.</p><p>What? I am trying to friggin uninstall an application. Who cares if the dependency is missing? That stupid dependency is probably why my icon keeps jumping and not launch and I am stuck with it even when I try uninstalling. I am sure there is a logical explanation why it cannot be uninstalled without that dependency, but come on!</p><p>I think I am quitting again and this time it may be for longer, as I write these lines from my fresh Windows 7 installation. Sorry to say as I am really for Open Source and the community, but Windows 7 answers my daily needs much better than Linux does. And don&#8217;t bring the &#8220;free&#8221; thing please, I earn my bread out of this device and don&#8217;t mind paying a couple hundered bucks every 3-4 years or so for upgrading.</p><p>Why nobody complains about cars getting old?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blizzerand</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-722027</link> <dc:creator>Blizzerand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:01:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-722027</guid> <description>FOR ALL OF THOSE WHO THINK LINUX IS DIFFICULT* Have you even tried it to begin it with . I hear people say they need hours of reading to even know how to install linux . Let me ask have you ever felt installing Windows difficult if not you wouldn&#039;t feel installing linux difficult too . And there are 100s of places where you can get support for linux . So shut it will ya .
@ Simple Guy , even though this is a late post what difficulty did you have that made you say so . Which distro do you use . And as far as I can tell and what I heard from those who have ACTUALLY USED LINUX it provides stability as well ease of use compared to some other well known operating system .
@ssh , have you ever thought of filing and  bug in the respective bugzilla . And if yes what was the response .
@pete , well in todays society Internet is an important factor and you can&#039;t deny it . And there are viruses (produced accidentally maybe as the windows geeks say) even in one of the most trusted sites . Ok now you have to bring another Anti virus pack where you spend a lot of dollars and buying a key for it once in a while is much bigger work than of getting rid of virus . But where as in linux even if a virus is detected it would be taken care of ( i do mean it ) as it is open source.Guys what makes linux tough is that you make it sound tough . Most of them who discouraged linux here may not have even used it once in a while . And installing is quite easy as installing windows .
WAKE UP thats what I&#039;d like to say from the old prison of windows .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR ALL OF THOSE WHO THINK LINUX IS DIFFICULT</p><p>* Have you even tried it to begin it with . I hear people say they need hours of reading to even know how to install linux . Let me ask have you ever felt installing Windows difficult if not you wouldn&#8217;t feel installing linux difficult too . And there are 100s of places where you can get support for linux . So shut it will ya .<br
/> @ Simple Guy , even though this is a late post what difficulty did you have that made you say so . Which distro do you use . And as far as I can tell and what I heard from those who have ACTUALLY USED LINUX it provides stability as well ease of use compared to some other well known operating system .<br
/> @ssh , have you ever thought of filing and  bug in the respective bugzilla . And if yes what was the response .<br
/> @pete , well in todays society Internet is an important factor and you can&#8217;t deny it . And there are viruses (produced accidentally maybe as the windows geeks say) even in one of the most trusted sites . Ok now you have to bring another Anti virus pack where you spend a lot of dollars and buying a key for it once in a while is much bigger work than of getting rid of virus . But where as in linux even if a virus is detected it would be taken care of ( i do mean it ) as it is open source.</p><p>Guys what makes linux tough is that you make it sound tough . Most of them who discouraged linux here may not have even used it once in a while . And installing is quite easy as installing windows .<br
/> WAKE UP thats what I&#8217;d like to say from the old prison of windows .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pete</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-717280</link> <dc:creator>pete</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:17:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-717280</guid> <description>Windows isn&#039;t as bad as you make it out to be...  People like you present the idea that Windows will be infected just by having the PC connected to the Internet...Reality is, Windows has no real issue if the user doesn&#039;t do stupid stuff...  Crud, Linux has the same problems in reality because you&#039;re opening the users files up to being deleted or stolen just by giving them full control over them and that&#039;s the part that this Open Source Community Seems to Forget...I&#039;ve watched your video and guess what?  I&#039;m one of those people that wants Photoshop before I&#039;ll switch and what&#039;s sad is that the only piece of hardware that wouldn&#039;t work, with the lastest installs of Linux I&#039;ve tried, was my HDTV Tuner and ultimately, it sent me to the Windows 7 RC to learn that as opposed to giving Linux a real go (with Photoshop under Wine because GIMP just sucks).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows isn&#8217;t as bad as you make it out to be&#8230;  People like you present the idea that Windows will be infected just by having the PC connected to the Internet&#8230;</p><p>Reality is, Windows has no real issue if the user doesn&#8217;t do stupid stuff&#8230;  Crud, Linux has the same problems in reality because you&#8217;re opening the users files up to being deleted or stolen just by giving them full control over them and that&#8217;s the part that this Open Source Community Seems to Forget&#8230;</p><p>I&#8217;ve watched your video and guess what?  I&#8217;m one of those people that wants Photoshop before I&#8217;ll switch and what&#8217;s sad is that the only piece of hardware that wouldn&#8217;t work, with the lastest installs of Linux I&#8217;ve tried, was my HDTV Tuner and ultimately, it sent me to the Windows 7 RC to learn that as opposed to giving Linux a real go (with Photoshop under Wine because GIMP just sucks).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: morpheus</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-711072</link> <dc:creator>morpheus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:08:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-711072</guid> <description>Very good discussion.My experience, for over two decades, has been with DOS, MacOS, Win32, Unix (Solaris) and Linux (RH and Fedora 4), and Mac OS X.  I&#039;ve done programming, graphics, and many other things using computers.  Like a lot of geeks, I&#039;ve complained about Windows for a long time, as I was interested in learning more about how things were working, and it&#039;s kinda fashionable to complain about Windows.  But the fact is, Windows usually works fairly well for nearly anything you want to get done in the real world, and when it does hang, it&#039;s easy to figure out why.  Mac OS X takes things to the next level, and is just a wonder to use and get things done, a highly polished diamond of simplicity and &quot;just works&quot;-ness.  Furthermore, getting to know how things work has accomplished its goal.  I know.So yes, Linux absolutely sucks.  It can be fun while its sucking, that&#039;s for sure, but unless you&#039;re running a server, one whose hardware is not going to change very often, you&#039;re far better off avoiding the uncountable lost hours you&#039;re going to give over learning &quot;how computers work&quot; by debugging someone else&#039;s lousy code, tracking down every little error Linux makes, from dependencies to poorly documented goofs, to stuff that just don&#039;t f-ing work.  If you really enjoy Googling for hours to find out why something doesn&#039;t work, especially on those not-so-rare occasions when you still can&#039;t get it fixed even after all the attempts, then Linux is for you.  It will be great fun for a while, as you learn the hard way and play with it, and make no mistake, some things will simply, inexplicably, moronically, just not work.Eventually, though, you will need stop thinking about how to debug the computer so you can do something WITH the computer, rather than doing stuff TO it.Most of us are neither dumb nor lazy - that&#039;s a copout from many Linux geeks.  I&#039;m a geek (sometimes a Linux geek), but I&#039;m friggin sick of debugging Linux all the time!  The only time Linux is trustworthy is when you don&#039;t change anything, so if you&#039;re lucky enough to have a Linux box which runs, by all means don&#039;t change it, don&#039;t get a new motherboard, or try to update the OS or the various &quot;packages&quot;.  Leave it frozen in whatever year you were lucky enough to get it running, as a reminder of what your mind was like then.  Only then can you enjoy the subculture which is Linux.  Otherwise, you&#039;ll always be Googling, searching and digging, hoping to figure out why something won&#039;t work, even when someone else has it working just fine.  The answer could be a click away, as you use your Windows machine to search for the answer, or you could waste another evening on Linux.Using Mac OS X, with the incredibly powerful but equally simple way it has, reminds me day after day that it&#039;s not about the computer, but the work I have to get done, and my work is not about debugging and fixing computers all day and night.  I simply need my computers to do the task, whether holding data as I write a paper, draw to the screen as I design a complex graphic, or transfer bytes as I backup files from one drive to another.  What&#039;s wrong with a geek using a computer to do something other than fix the computer?So, why the hell can&#039;t Linux be like Mac OS X?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good discussion.</p><p>My experience, for over two decades, has been with DOS, MacOS, Win32, Unix (Solaris) and Linux (RH and Fedora 4), and Mac OS X.  I&#8217;ve done programming, graphics, and many other things using computers.  Like a lot of geeks, I&#8217;ve complained about Windows for a long time, as I was interested in learning more about how things were working, and it&#8217;s kinda fashionable to complain about Windows.  But the fact is, Windows usually works fairly well for nearly anything you want to get done in the real world, and when it does hang, it&#8217;s easy to figure out why.  Mac OS X takes things to the next level, and is just a wonder to use and get things done, a highly polished diamond of simplicity and &#8220;just works&#8221;-ness.  Furthermore, getting to know how things work has accomplished its goal.  I know.</p><p>So yes, Linux absolutely sucks.  It can be fun while its sucking, that&#8217;s for sure, but unless you&#8217;re running a server, one whose hardware is not going to change very often, you&#8217;re far better off avoiding the uncountable lost hours you&#8217;re going to give over learning &#8220;how computers work&#8221; by debugging someone else&#8217;s lousy code, tracking down every little error Linux makes, from dependencies to poorly documented goofs, to stuff that just don&#8217;t f-ing work.  If you really enjoy Googling for hours to find out why something doesn&#8217;t work, especially on those not-so-rare occasions when you still can&#8217;t get it fixed even after all the attempts, then Linux is for you.  It will be great fun for a while, as you learn the hard way and play with it, and make no mistake, some things will simply, inexplicably, moronically, just not work.</p><p>Eventually, though, you will need stop thinking about how to debug the computer so you can do something WITH the computer, rather than doing stuff TO it.</p><p>Most of us are neither dumb nor lazy &#8211; that&#8217;s a copout from many Linux geeks.  I&#8217;m a geek (sometimes a Linux geek), but I&#8217;m friggin sick of debugging Linux all the time!  The only time Linux is trustworthy is when you don&#8217;t change anything, so if you&#8217;re lucky enough to have a Linux box which runs, by all means don&#8217;t change it, don&#8217;t get a new motherboard, or try to update the OS or the various &#8220;packages&#8221;.  Leave it frozen in whatever year you were lucky enough to get it running, as a reminder of what your mind was like then.  Only then can you enjoy the subculture which is Linux.  Otherwise, you&#8217;ll always be Googling, searching and digging, hoping to figure out why something won&#8217;t work, even when someone else has it working just fine.  The answer could be a click away, as you use your Windows machine to search for the answer, or you could waste another evening on Linux.</p><p>Using Mac OS X, with the incredibly powerful but equally simple way it has, reminds me day after day that it&#8217;s not about the computer, but the work I have to get done, and my work is not about debugging and fixing computers all day and night.  I simply need my computers to do the task, whether holding data as I write a paper, draw to the screen as I design a complex graphic, or transfer bytes as I backup files from one drive to another.  What&#8217;s wrong with a geek using a computer to do something other than fix the computer?</p><p>So, why the hell can&#8217;t Linux be like Mac OS X?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ssh</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-708074</link> <dc:creator>ssh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:52:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-708074</guid> <description>My newest stable Kubuntu distro keeps crashing right after update, lost wifi. Woud wipe it out but do not know how to remove grub. And hey, why they can not make decent touchpad support in linux? It&#039;s close to impossible to manipualte. sucks many times.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My newest stable Kubuntu distro keeps crashing right after update, lost wifi. Woud wipe it out but do not know how to remove grub. And hey, why they can not make decent touchpad support in linux? It&#8217;s close to impossible to manipualte. sucks many times.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simple Guy</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-707955</link> <dc:creator>Simple Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:52:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-707955</guid> <description>To improve linux somebody must change it, common it&#039;s based on unix. Linux people &quot;THINK USABILITY&quot;. Stop being elitist, I don&#039;t care if you have an IQ way superior to rest of the world&#039;s population. Stop being self-centered and &quot;THINK ABOUT USERS&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To improve linux somebody must change it, common it&#8217;s based on unix. Linux people &#8220;THINK USABILITY&#8221;. Stop being elitist, I don&#8217;t care if you have an IQ way superior to rest of the world&#8217;s population. Stop being self-centered and &#8220;THINK ABOUT USERS&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Owain</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-704985</link> <dc:creator>Owain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:57:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-704985</guid> <description>@DGWhat distro did you use recently?
I&#039;m not one of those pain the ass Linux fan boys, and I do think user friendliness is still lacking, but Linux has definitely come a LONG way in a few years.
I haven&#039;t needed to compile anything or install something in the terminal for ages, most things now are all in binary form (.deb &amp; .rpm)
KDE 4.2 has been released, which looks great, what a modern OS should be like, although some people have had a few problems with bugs, mine has been fine.
Install was pathetically easy, a lot more so than Windows.
I think Linux will be the answer,  guess time will tell.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DG</p><p>What distro did you use recently?<br
/> I&#8217;m not one of those pain the ass Linux fan boys, and I do think user friendliness is still lacking, but Linux has definitely come a LONG way in a few years.<br
/> I haven&#8217;t needed to compile anything or install something in the terminal for ages, most things now are all in binary form (.deb &amp; .rpm)<br
/> KDE 4.2 has been released, which looks great, what a modern OS should be like, although some people have had a few problems with bugs, mine has been fine.<br
/> Install was pathetically easy, a lot more so than Windows.<br
/> I think Linux will be the answer,  guess time will tell.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DG</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-700566</link> <dc:creator>DG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:54:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-700566</guid> <description>You have to remember that the whole thing for Linux geeks IS that it is hard to install and use, takes hours to learn to accomplish the most mundane tasks, requires one to spend far more time tweaking their system than actually using it for anything useful, etc..  It&#039;s just a nerd elitist mentality experiment taken to its extreme.  Linux will never, NEVER make it, because Linux dorks do not remotely get it.  And you know what?  They don&#039;t want to...that goes against their whole grain, which is all about, again, nerd elitism.Tried it many years ago, fiddled with it again recently, was shocked (although shouldn&#039;t have been) and disgusted to see how little actual progress was made.  Sad state of affairs.  I hate Microsoft and Macs alike but unfortunately Linux isn&#039;t and never will be the answer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to remember that the whole thing for Linux geeks IS that it is hard to install and use, takes hours to learn to accomplish the most mundane tasks, requires one to spend far more time tweaking their system than actually using it for anything useful, etc..  It&#8217;s just a nerd elitist mentality experiment taken to its extreme.  Linux will never, NEVER make it, because Linux dorks do not remotely get it.  And you know what?  They don&#8217;t want to&#8230;that goes against their whole grain, which is all about, again, nerd elitism.</p><p>Tried it many years ago, fiddled with it again recently, was shocked (although shouldn&#8217;t have been) and disgusted to see how little actual progress was made.  Sad state of affairs.  I hate Microsoft and Macs alike but unfortunately Linux isn&#8217;t and never will be the answer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cloudscream</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-699749</link> <dc:creator>cloudscream</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:55:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-699749</guid> <description>Those geeks who tried Linux and said that it sucks are just, well, geeks. They keep dabbling with Compiz (duh) and wanted to play a heck of a lot of 3d games FOR Windows IN Linux.
I don&#039;t understand why people hate the un-usability of Linux while they say Mac OSX  is user-friendly. That&#039;s just the familiarity factor if you&#039;ve been using MS Windows since time immemorial...And exactly what Linux distribution are you talking about? How can the Linux kernel suck?Again: you hate what you don&#039;t know; you pretend to know what you hate.&quot;Linux sucks!&quot; - that sentence exposes a lot of your ignorance and that&#039;s inexcusable. Go back to your pricey Mac that you keep trying to value or your pirated Windows XP/Vista OS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those geeks who tried Linux and said that it sucks are just, well, geeks. They keep dabbling with Compiz (duh) and wanted to play a heck of a lot of 3d games FOR Windows IN Linux.<br
/> I don&#8217;t understand why people hate the un-usability of Linux while they say Mac OSX  is user-friendly. That&#8217;s just the familiarity factor if you&#8217;ve been using MS Windows since time immemorial&#8230;</p><p>And exactly what Linux distribution are you talking about? How can the Linux kernel suck?</p><p>Again: you hate what you don&#8217;t know; you pretend to know what you hate.</p><p>&#8220;Linux sucks!&#8221; &#8211; that sentence exposes a lot of your ignorance and that&#8217;s inexcusable. Go back to your pricey Mac that you keep trying to value or your pirated Windows XP/Vista OS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken McAvoy</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-690988</link> <dc:creator>Ken McAvoy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-690988</guid> <description>It seems to me a fairly pointless exercise to slam either Linux or Windows as both have problems and faults and do not represent  perfect software by a long shot. This is turning into a slanging match akin to Holden vs Ford and it wastes intellect and potential trying to out slang one another. It is exactly this achilles heel that is causing the self destruction of IT operating systems. No matter what you think of Windows it is serving up a need for over 80% of the world&#039;s population who are putting up with its imperfections in the hope that Microsoft might one day listen , learn and get it right. Linux devotees are going through the same issues , e.g I installed Ubuntu last week and could not get it to recognize my vanilla video card so I was unable to drive the screen beyond 640x480x16 colors so how you Linux devotees think that is a great I simply do not understand. Software has to get easier , it has to get simpler , if you want complexity go play chess on the international scene if that gets you going but for most of us we don&#039;t want to waste time understanding a PC we just want to use it , and to achieve that we do not need to be re-learning old tricks or playing the update game. As another example I re-installed Windows ME on an old P3 and got it to deliver me every feature I can currently need  on XP/Vista albeit I don&#039;t like ME it did work and worked a whole lot faster   than either XP/Vista or Ubuntu so a lot of the commentary here is puffing in the wind.Ken
IT Director
Melbourne</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me a fairly pointless exercise to slam either Linux or Windows as both have problems and faults and do not represent  perfect software by a long shot. This is turning into a slanging match akin to Holden vs Ford and it wastes intellect and potential trying to out slang one another. It is exactly this achilles heel that is causing the self destruction of IT operating systems. No matter what you think of Windows it is serving up a need for over 80% of the world&#8217;s population who are putting up with its imperfections in the hope that Microsoft might one day listen , learn and get it right. Linux devotees are going through the same issues , e.g I installed Ubuntu last week and could not get it to recognize my vanilla video card so I was unable to drive the screen beyond 640&#215;480x16 colors so how you Linux devotees think that is a great I simply do not understand. Software has to get easier , it has to get simpler , if you want complexity go play chess on the international scene if that gets you going but for most of us we don&#8217;t want to waste time understanding a PC we just want to use it , and to achieve that we do not need to be re-learning old tricks or playing the update game. As another example I re-installed Windows ME on an old P3 and got it to deliver me every feature I can currently need  on XP/Vista albeit I don&#8217;t like ME it did work and worked a whole lot faster   than either XP/Vista or Ubuntu so a lot of the commentary here is puffing in the wind.</p><p>Ken<br
/> IT Director<br
/> Melbourne</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zguljo</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-690966</link> <dc:creator>zguljo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:20:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-690966</guid> <description>The easiest way to put it is....all experts in their area are using linux because of better control of system etities..Windows are (intesionlly are) wide and dumb.. Dont get me wrong i am using windows as normal OS for everyday... but hey it takes only 21 days to learn how to properly operate linux (even debian), human ignorace as well as the pride are most common problem of this so called society, but that&#039;s just copmuters area that should in  way help us to get things easeir done...i wrote this after half bottle of rum so take no charge at it as is..linux is better concept YOU cannot argue with that (opensource)...best way to settle this is for windows to be open source aswell and everything would be jelly...but no money as the most stupid invention of all kind is dirigating this world...humans are stupid and lat&#039;s face it everything in this worl first beginning with society is based on the fact that a man is stupid...And to get to to beginning of this post; niels bohr sad that the expert is a man that have done all mistakes in a very narrow field...don&#039;t just read it understand itkind regardsvedran galetasweden and croatia</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to put it is&#8230;.all experts in their area are using linux because of better control of system etities..Windows are (intesionlly are) wide and dumb.. Dont get me wrong i am using windows as normal OS for everyday&#8230; but hey it takes only 21 days to learn how to properly operate linux (even debian), human ignorace as well as the pride are most common problem of this so called society, but that&#8217;s just copmuters area that should in  way help us to get things easeir done&#8230;</p><p>i wrote this after half bottle of rum so take no charge at it as is..linux is better concept YOU cannot argue with that (opensource)&#8230;best way to settle this is for windows to be open source aswell and everything would be jelly&#8230;but no money as the most stupid invention of all kind is dirigating this world&#8230;humans are stupid and lat&#8217;s face it everything in this worl first beginning with society is based on the fact that a man is stupid&#8230;</p><p>And to get to to beginning of this post; niels bohr sad that the expert is a man that have done all mistakes in a very narrow field&#8230;don&#8217;t just read it understand it</p><p>kind regards</p><p>vedran galeta</p><p>sweden and croatia</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pallanium</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-690060</link> <dc:creator>Pallanium</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-690060</guid> <description>Is it that hard?sudo aptitude installThis is how you install stuff on the most popular distributions of linux...To upgrade?
sudo aptitude upgradeorsudo apt upgrade safeYEAAAAAA HOW DIFFICULT...Personnaly I installed my graphic card and wifi card in minute with the windows drivers...Work perfectly...And for the average people...There is a grapical user interface for installing programs..Im not talking about compiling here or anything...In ubuntu,just click you .deb synaptic package and it will install..Just has easy then windows..And you know what?Something that makes linux much more secure is that many programs and kept in a repository wich are virus free...And if you have any issue,there is a huge community of expert to help you to get rid of your problems...Well this may not be for all linux distribution,but it is for ubuntu.And you can order a cd by mail for free,they pay the mail charges.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it that hard?</p><p>sudo aptitude install</p><p>This is how you install stuff on the most popular distributions of linux&#8230;</p><p>To upgrade?<br
/> sudo aptitude upgrade</p><p>or</p><p>sudo apt upgrade safe</p><p>YEAAAAAA HOW DIFFICULT&#8230;Personnaly I installed my graphic card and wifi card in minute with the windows drivers&#8230;Work perfectly&#8230;</p><p>And for the average people&#8230;There is a grapical user interface for installing programs..Im not talking about compiling here or anything&#8230;</p><p>In ubuntu,just click you .deb synaptic package and it will install..Just has easy then windows..And you know what?Something that makes linux much more secure is that many programs and kept in a repository wich are virus free&#8230;And if you have any issue,there is a huge community of expert to help you to get rid of your problems&#8230;</p><p>Well this may not be for all linux distribution,but it is for ubuntu.And you can order a cd by mail for free,they pay the mail charges.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/linux-sucks/comment-page-2/#comment-682592</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/26/linux-sucks/#comment-682592</guid> <description>I don&#039;t understand why some people (who usually call themselves &quot;real&quot; developers/administrators) are so infatuated with Linux? Some attribute their infatuation to the fact that Linux creators put out its source code for everyone, as if it will let them know what makes Linux tick.
That is misconseption number one: Linux kernel contains upwards of 10 million lines of code, which renders your attempts at figuring out how it works fruitless. You can&#039;t analyze even one hundredth part of the code. Moreover, Linux code has a tendency to grow in size, which creates a possibility for mistakes to crop up more and more, and soon, coupled with the fact that a lot of motley people are working on it, it will be rife with errors, as Windows 95 is
To those of you out there who still thiks that Windows &quot;sucks&quot; and teeming with faults, have you tried out Windows 2003 or 2008 or XP? Those  OSs are very stable and secure and they can hold candle to Linux and I think they even better (much better)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why some people (who usually call themselves &#8220;real&#8221; developers/administrators) are so infatuated with Linux? Some attribute their infatuation to the fact that Linux creators put out its source code for everyone, as if it will let them know what makes Linux tick.<br
/> That is misconseption number one: Linux kernel contains upwards of 10 million lines of code, which renders your attempts at figuring out how it works fruitless. You can&#8217;t analyze even one hundredth part of the code. Moreover, Linux code has a tendency to grow in size, which creates a possibility for mistakes to crop up more and more, and soon, coupled with the fact that a lot of motley people are working on it, it will be rife with errors, as Windows 95 is<br
/> To those of you out there who still thiks that Windows &#8220;sucks&#8221; and teeming with faults, have you tried out Windows 2003 or 2008 or XP? Those  OSs are very stable and secure and they can hold candle to Linux and I think they even better (much better)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.62 @ 2009-11-25 07:16:48 -->