Iraq, Iran, War, Money, Me, and US
Now, before I start, let me disclose that I’m politically independent – having voted for Clinton in his first term, and George W. Bush in his first term. I feel it’s important to state this only because (a) it’s the truth, and (b) I don’t live my life on party lines. I’m neither Republican nor Democrat – I’m just a regular ol’ American. Right? Left? Middle? Feh.
Last night, I watched Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers on Google Video. Its creator says:
For the past seven months, I have worked with politicians and groups all over the country trying to get the message of this film out, namely that we have to ask questions, to demand that Congress does its job. It appears that to do that, we need to make some serious changes in Washington. I hope and expect that the American public will look at this film and demand change. Patriots seek justice. Without justice, America folds.
And lest you think I’m pointing fingers at this country’s conservative leadership, check out Feinstein’s war profiteering:
SEN. Dianne Feinstein has resigned from the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee. As previously and extensively reviewed in these pages, Feinstein was chairperson and ranking member of MILCON for six years, during which time she had a conflict of interest due to her husband Richard C. Blum’s ownership of two major defense contractors, who were awarded billions of dollars for military construction projects approved by Feinstein.
The special interest groups are OUT OF CONTROL. And if you think we’ll stop with Iraq:
- US Army Troop Build up on Iraq-Iran Borders
- Russian Intelligence Reports U.S. Military Buildup Near Iranian Borders
- Easter Surprise: Attack on Iran, New 9/11… or Worse
- Knocking Out Iran
- Chomsky on Iran, Iraq, and the Rest of the World
- Middle East Pondering Possible US Attack on Iran
- Iran and the American Left
- FOX News Blames Democrats For Iran Captives
[EDIT: I originally had Rosie O'Donnell's statement here, but some readers felt this somehow undermined the credibility of my position.] Only time will tell. War isn’t about freedom anymore – it’s about money. I keep hearing the Bush administration stating over and over again:
…serves at the pleasure of the President…
Am I wrong to think that they should be saying: “The President serves at the pleasure of his/her Citizens?” Guess so. This country is NO LONGER IN OUR HANDS – and as bright-eyed as I want to be about the situation as it stands, I can’t help but think that THIS IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTIME SOON. This isn’t about patriotism – it’s about politics and power. Elections are nothing more than dog and pony shows.
On the radio today, I heard a presidential candidate having to defend himself because he hadn’t generated as much financial support as Giuliani or Hillary. SINCE WHEN DID THE SIZE OF YOUR POCKETBOOK IMPACT YOUR TRUE ABILITY TO LEAD? Campaign finance is OUT OF CONTROL. The Internet is the great liberator – and the first “underdog” candidate to take advantage of that fact is going to win a lion’s share of my support based on the fact that s/he isn’t supporting an INHERENTLY IMBALANCED SYSTEM.
Screw the television networks, man – run your freakin’ campaigns on YouTube, Revver, Break.com, Blip.tv, etc. Forget the newspapers, man – run your freakin’ campaigns in blogs and citizen media networks. Drop the radio dial, man – hit up podcasters far and wide, whether politically-oriented or not.
I seriously can’t believe that my fellow Americans continue to put up with this shit. I support our troops, and I support the belief in our nation – but I refuse to support corruption and government that is not truly ruled by the people. It doesn’t matter who we elect in this next cycle – war is inevitable, profiteering is inevitable, opaqueness is inevitable, posturing is inevitable…
…but the day of reckoning is coming sooner than you think.









23 Comments
The Imus Show Blog
April 3rd, 2007
at 3:19pm
beautiful and distinctive voices in music and has won 20 Grammy Awards. She sings one of my favorite Christmas songs along with Alan Jackson, The Angels Cried, Honky Tonk Christmas. I ran across a blog article that talks about politics and being a regular old American. Something we talk about in this blog all the time. The author is Chris Pirillo, unless you’re a computer geek you’ve probably never heard of him. It’s worth taking a few minutes to read. Technorati Tags:
y o u j u s t d o n t g e t . u s
April 3rd, 2007
at 3:25am
Iraq, Iran, War, Money, Me, and US ~ Chris Pirillo
The Chris Pirillo Show
April 2nd, 2007
at 8:08am
Personal Blog Iraq, Iran, War, Money, Me, and US Email Newsletters vs. Blogs vs. RSS Our Plastic Surgery Results Podcasts on TVs and Tablet PCs – MP3s Pirillo?s Picks for 03/31/2007 New Barenaked Ladies Videos Wireless Power How not to use a Gun
best buy
April 2nd, 2007
at 5:59am
Ewen Chia Launches His Best Product For 2007! Is Ewen Chia really retired? He is now launching the affiliate of the month program, and claims that people who buy it will become affiliate success… More… Iraq, Iran, War, Money, Me, and US Bush loves BitTorrent; Simple Math; Best Buy Law Botch; Venting Plasma; Terrorist Attack in SF! Danger, Will Robinson; The Debate Rages On; Who the hell is Franck Muller and why the hell are his watches so damn expensive!?
Embed My Video
April 2nd, 2007
at 7:54am
HOT SEXY VIDEOS Well Played, in more ways than one. Be Patriotic: Forward This Video Iraq, Iran, War, Money, Me, and US First 30 seconds of The Drinky Crow Show
Iran « eye on iran
April 3rd, 2007
at 4:46am
Blogroll Al Jaazeera English BBC News Chris Prillo Drudge Report Hot Air Iran Resist (French) News Hounds Regime Change Iran View from Iran
Dukrous
April 2nd, 2007
at 12:07am
You’re falling for the kool-aid, Chris. :)
The President’s staff does serve at his pleasure. He is the one who picked them for the job and Congress only approves or denies his choice. They don’t decide his staff for him. When he decides they’re not doing their job to his satisfaction, then he is the one who fires them. They’re not elected positions, they’re appointed, so there is no option for impeachment.
However, the president does serve at OUR pleasure. If we don’t like the decisions the president has made, then we appeal to Congress for an impeachment or vote him out of office or vote his party out of office.
There’s a lot of wolf crying lately that the system is broken and this and that, but the system works. It simply works much slower than Internet Time (it’s 4 years minimum between political revolutions) and as a result it seems slow and inefficient.
As for war profiteering, this has been a fact since a king realized he can have more power under war than under peace. It’s been with us since we first formed tribes before written history. And it’ll continue to happen. Absolute democracy does not work nearly as well as a representative democracy and for as long as that’s true there will always be people we assign with power and they will abuse it for as long as possible. It’s one the main reason I’m a huge fan of term limits for all positions in the government, even judges.
But this will never happen for one simple reason…those in power will not vote themselves out of power. Like you said, it’s nothing to do with party affiliation…it has to do with the fact that a segment of the population craves power over others. And that’s just how some brains calculate survivability…one of those annoying traits we have because we evolved from scared monkeys in trees.
Don Marsh
April 2nd, 2007
at 1:40am
Chris, I’ve been a candidate for local office, and I will be one again soon. I gotta tell you that as much as I agree with you that Internet media is the way to go, that the voting public does not buy that yet. They follow the money. for the most part, ideology be damned. People pay so little attention to their own system of government that everything is geared toward getting that tiny group that calls the shots to pay attention: 50% +1 of the people who care enough to vote. And in local elections, the turnout can be as low as 9%. I am not kidding. And when you consider the fact that only a little over 60% of the people who COULD vote even register, you are looking at 9% of 50% of 60% of the people who could vote just called the shots. And those people are pretty easily moved by slick mailers and packaged sound bites. They are not bloggers and they only tune in the last week of a campaign. The voting population is lazy, apathetic, and easily moved by negative campaigning. As Pogo said, we have me the enemy, and he is us!
Tim
April 2nd, 2007
at 3:27am
Dukrous, that was the most brilliant comment I’ve ever read on any political post. You nailed it. People try to make thinks WAY more complicated than they are. I agree with you totally.
Iran - The New York Sun
April 2nd, 2007
at 3:43am
[...] Iraq, Iran, War, Money, Me, and US Chris Pirillo | Apr 2, 2007 2:27am EDT [...]
Andrew Leyden
April 2nd, 2007
at 4:37am
You had me until Rosie…
Then the irrelevance factor went up. Way up…
michael
April 2nd, 2007
at 7:48am
i think rosie missed the times article about the iranian troops that came into iraq trying to start a fight. and yes war profiteering sucks but it has happened in every war, i dont like it because it takes money away from what would go to the military as combat pay (when the war started the military got $250 month combat pay now they only get $50 for combat pay) having a brother serving his second tour in iraq this upsets me.
bobmorris
April 2nd, 2007
at 7:48am
The Net can help enormously in getting the word out, but it can’t substitute for face-to-face organizing, for getting in the streets, for mobilizing in communities, and I say that as one who has helped organize multiple antiwar protests, some of which have drawn hundreds of thousands or people.
That war profiteering has always occurred doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be opposed now!
“If there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation…want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters…. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” — Frederick Douglass
michael
April 2nd, 2007
at 7:55am
Dukrous, i also agree with you great comment
zach
April 2nd, 2007
at 8:31am
The moment you attempted to give Rosie O credibility.. I lost all interest in this article. That woman is off her rocker.
Jack
April 2nd, 2007
at 9:41am
So the UK sent 15 Sailors (one woman) into two rubber dinghies to start a war with Iran? The UK hasn’t even got any Naval air support at present and is reducing it’s armed forces quite dramatically.
The UK sailors were there under a UN mandate and were checking boats for anything illegal.
The Iranians told the British THREE times the co-ordinates where they were captured. When Britain pointed out these were co-ordinates in Iraqi waters they changed their mind.
You my friend, are an idiot.
Luke
April 2nd, 2007
at 10:00am
“I seriously can’t believe that my fellow Americans continue to put up with this shit”
This is what the rest of the world has been thinking for years.
I agree with the most of the comments, your post sounded intelligent until you quoted Rosie.
francine hardaway
April 2nd, 2007
at 10:12am
In the 1950’s, Dwight Eisenhower warned about the permanent war economy and the buildup of the military-industrial complex. I remember a particularly stirring New Yorker cartoon in which tanks were rolled off the end of a pier into the ocean so that we could build more tanks. Nothing has changed in fifty years.
Solo
April 3rd, 2007
at 2:36am
I am not American. I do not live in the US. But I can tell you, most of the world no longer looks up to the US as a ‘leading’ nation because of the fascist-like Bush Administration. I studied in the US and liked the US a great deal, but you guys need to get your act together and impeach Bush and Cheney ASAP. The Bush administration is leading the entire America into a no-return path of hatred.
Thanks to the wonderful world of BT and my local pay TV service (legality issue aside for the moment…if I could purchase these programs via iTunes, I would, but iTunes only work if you live in the US and a few selected countries), I am able to watch quite a bit of US TV, from the ridiculously biased Fox News to the most ‘liberal’ shows like Real Time with Bill Maher. Of course, I also get to watch shows like The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and The Colbert Report. Much of the media (less FOX News) seem to have it together, but people on the Internet needs to get their acts together and just impeach Bush asap.
The administration is a joke. Show the world what true democracy is. With such a low approval rating, I do not see how he can remain as president.
paulmorris
April 3rd, 2007
at 8:52am
As I said in my year ending post about Canadians, which also applies to any western country and its people, the sheep mentality needs to change. When most people think about sheep mentality they associate it with those who blindly follow conservative aka republican politicians. It also applies to left wing aka Democrat aka Labour aka Liberal parties and their followers. I read a wide variety of blogs and journalists online as well as various news sources.I try to sift thru it all to arrive at a balanced viewpoint- unlike Dukrous. Jack, in his post made a valid point. The problem is Jack, the Lib lefties don’t want to face facts like yours, and the righties may choose to use it as propaganda to validate their positions also. I read an article online recently by an Arab Palestinian Christian who outlined why it was a disaster for Israel to listen to the UN and the Russians (and their ilk) and by doing so withdraw from Lebanon last year without a conclusive victory over Hisb’Allah and Hamas, Iran and Syria. This is first hand observation from someone who lives in the milieu every day. I would strongly urge anyone who wants such a first hand view to email me and I will forward it (I received it from a Dutch friend).A lot of the points would also apply to the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.
If you want really different but definitely interesting reading, I can point you to more resources.
Lunabean
April 4th, 2007
at 12:38pm
I don’t have time to get into any of this right now, but I do feel the need to say one thing, and that’s about your “Independent” status. I’m all for independant voting. However, I do get a little twitchy when self-proclaimed Independents feel the need to almost put down those of us who align themselves with one party in an attempt to make themselves look more thoughtful, unbiased, and, well, independent.
Like many Americans, I’m a proud Democrat, but I certainly don’t “live my life on party lines”. If there’s a good Republican running, I will (and have) vote for them. I’ve just studied enough of the political system to know that my politics fall more with the Democrats than with the Republicans (particularly over the past few years), and I take pride in the fact that I get to vote for Dems in primaries because of that.
In other words, just because I align myself with one party doesn’t make me a less thoughtful, more biased, and less independent voter. In fact, I see some “independents” as being independent because they like to pretend they’re above the political system, while they’re usually too lazy to get their hands dirty and figure out what, exactly, they believe in politically (present company excluded, of course).
Sorry if it seems I’m going after you, here. I’m not. I’m just taking out my aggression toward my “Independent” brother in law on this incredibly thoughtful entry. Thanks for noting the video, as I’ve been meaning to rent it. Thank goodness for Google Video!
Michael Markman
April 6th, 2007
at 3:46pm
Sadly, no. The president serves a four-year term. Political appointees serve at the pleasure of the president–meaning as long as he’s pleased and not a nano-second longer. Impeachment is a legal process that has nothing to do with pleasure or lack thereof. (Even in Clinton’s case, it wasn’t about Monica pleasuring him, but about his lying about it.) We don’t have the “no confidence” vote that can end the term of a prime minister. Our consitituion came down on the side of stability over pleasure.
Richard Love you
March 16th, 2009
at 12:49am
I have read a number of your post and I love it, can’t wait to read some more.