<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .INFO Domains are .DEAD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/</link>
	<description>Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris pirol</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-706613</link>
		<dc:creator>chris pirol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-706613</guid>
		<description>wanker....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wanker&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-690517</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-690517</guid>
		<description>Perhaps, if enough people add links to their sites with quality _information_, then the validity of the lead article will weaken considerably. The language used is pretty forceful, so I don't think that an apology for its wild and inaccurate will be readily forthcoming.

Having registered the www.caronia2.info domain for almost 5 years now, and paid-up for the next 10, I'm far from convinced that I should kill it off. With visitors staying anything up to 4 hours at a time and record visitor counts of 9,000 a month, I'm dead happy!

Not bad for a site about a ship that foundered over 35 years ago, is it?

Regards
Steve (Peter S.)
Caronia II Timeline Webmaster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, if enough people add links to their sites with quality _information_, then the validity of the lead article will weaken considerably. The language used is pretty forceful, so I don&#8217;t think that an apology for its wild and inaccurate will be readily forthcoming.</p>
<p>Having registered the <a href="http://www.caronia2.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.caronia2.info</a> domain for almost 5 years now, and paid-up for the next 10, I&#8217;m far from convinced that I should kill it off. With visitors staying anything up to 4 hours at a time and record visitor counts of 9,000 a month, I&#8217;m dead happy!</p>
<p>Not bad for a site about a ship that foundered over 35 years ago, is it?</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Steve (Peter S.)<br />
Caronia II Timeline Webmaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad Nicula</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-681780</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Nicula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-681780</guid>
		<description>I am registering a .info domain right now, and like it or not, I will use it for a junk site, and guess what, it will make me money, so... just let it go, .info domains are useful if you have a brain between your two ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am registering a .info domain right now, and like it or not, I will use it for a junk site, and guess what, it will make me money, so&#8230; just let it go, .info domains are useful if you have a brain between your two ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-673587</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-673587</guid>
		<description>Yes, there are .info sites out there (such as the ones right in front of me) that aren't owned by scammers, and are paying off. Heck, people have taken popular company names from the .com's and phished for their users with their .net or .co.uk ...which, well yeah, might have been a better choice than the .info...ugh scammers. 

And maybe some of us are looking for a name with a good appraisal. If it's a fair price for a domain, I might as well go ahead and register for a year and see what happens. But, we'll have to see, obviously, if all this negative talk about them will sway the good businesses from bidding. 

Or maybe, just a thought, maybe scammers will start to realize .info's are becoming less credible and give it up so the real people might end up more fortunate with their .informative sites...? 

And me, personally...I'm liking .info(rmation). Hmm, not com(mercial), not net(work), not org(anization)...an info site...kinda cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there are .info sites out there (such as the ones right in front of me) that aren&#8217;t owned by scammers, and are paying off. Heck, people have taken popular company names from the .com&#8217;s and phished for their users with their .net or .co.uk &#8230;which, well yeah, might have been a better choice than the .info&#8230;ugh scammers. </p>
<p>And maybe some of us are looking for a name with a good appraisal. If it&#8217;s a fair price for a domain, I might as well go ahead and register for a year and see what happens. But, we&#8217;ll have to see, obviously, if all this negative talk about them will sway the good businesses from bidding. </p>
<p>Or maybe, just a thought, maybe scammers will start to realize .info&#8217;s are becoming less credible and give it up so the real people might end up more fortunate with their .informative sites&#8230;? </p>
<p>And me, personally&#8230;I&#8217;m liking .info(rmation). Hmm, not com(mercial), not net(work), not org(anization)&#8230;an info site&#8230;kinda cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Registry Cleaner Comparison</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-2/#comment-623644</link>
		<dc:creator>Registry Cleaner Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-623644</guid>
		<description>The only time I have seen .info used if for those looking to use a specific keyword based domain name, but the .com, .net and .org have already been taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only time I have seen .info used if for those looking to use a specific keyword based domain name, but the .com, .net and .org have already been taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrummerDude</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-528772</link>
		<dc:creator>DrummerDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-528772</guid>
		<description>Can I point out that .info is short for .information? Or is everyone so sucked in by the "ZoMg WDF, Use every domain name possible, spammers" and so on that they forget the original intention. A cheap alternative for various departments or organizations to host a site that they don't want to pay the full deal for on a domain that they have to sit on just to reserve the name. If people are taking .info JUST because of the fact that it has a lot of open domain names, then people arent using their imaginations. Use a pun with a .com or something. Use a funny quote for your domain. Some humour/cleverness would be appreciated in this endless sea of E-Idiots out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I point out that .info is short for .information? Or is everyone so sucked in by the &#8220;ZoMg WDF, Use every domain name possible, spammers&#8221; and so on that they forget the original intention. A cheap alternative for various departments or organizations to host a site that they don&#8217;t want to pay the full deal for on a domain that they have to sit on just to reserve the name. If people are taking .info JUST because of the fact that it has a lot of open domain names, then people arent using their imaginations. Use a pun with a .com or something. Use a funny quote for your domain. Some humour/cleverness would be appreciated in this endless sea of E-Idiots out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-515443</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-515443</guid>
		<description>I have had an info domain for more than two years (yachats.info) and receive a reasonable amount of traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had an info domain for more than two years (<a href="http://yachats.info" title="http://yachats.info" target="_blank">yachats.info</a>) and receive a reasonable amount of traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prabhath</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-482549</link>
		<dc:creator>Prabhath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-482549</guid>
		<description>.info is a generic top-level domain intended for informative websites, although its use is not restricted. It was a part of ICANN's highly publicized announcement, in late 2000, of a phased release of seven new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). The event was billed as the first addition of major gTLDs to the Internet since the DNS was developed in the 1980s. The seven new gTLDs, selected from over 180 proposals, were meant in part to take the pressure off the overcrowded .com domain.

.info has been the most successful of the seven new domain names, with over 4 million domain names registered up to March 2007. In addition, over 1.6 million .info websites are in active and dedicated use. In the immediate aftermath of September 11th, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority switched to the easier to remember mta.info website to lead users to latest information on schedules and route changes on the area's transportation services. Spain.info is used by Spain's tourism board to promote visitors to come to Spain.

.info is an unrestricted domain, meaning that anyone can obtain a second-level domain under .info. As a generic, unrestricted domain name, anyone can use .info for any purpose, similar to .com, .net or .org domains. This is in contrast to a TLD such as .edu or .coop, which comes with criteria. .info is the first and only top-level domain that was explicitly created and chartered for unrestricted use, though various other TLDs have ended up that way as a de facto situation. .info means information in about 37 languages around the world, and is a neutral name. Afilias has been aggressive in its marketing of .info, with significant registrar incentives and outreach events.

The .info domain has been operated since its creation by Afilias. In 2003, .info was the first gTLD domain to support IETF standards-based internationalized domain names, as described at .info IDN. Registrations are processed via accredited registrars and internationalized domain names may also be registered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.info is a generic top-level domain intended for informative websites, although its use is not restricted. It was a part of ICANN&#8217;s highly publicized announcement, in late 2000, of a phased release of seven new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). The event was billed as the first addition of major gTLDs to the Internet since the DNS was developed in the 1980s. The seven new gTLDs, selected from over 180 proposals, were meant in part to take the pressure off the overcrowded .com domain.</p>
<p>.info has been the most successful of the seven new domain names, with over 4 million domain names registered up to March 2007. In addition, over 1.6 million .info websites are in active and dedicated use. In the immediate aftermath of September 11th, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority switched to the easier to remember <a href="http://mta.info" title="http://mta.info" target="_blank">mta.info</a> website to lead users to latest information on schedules and route changes on the area&#8217;s transportation services. <a href="http://Spain.info" title="http://Spain.info" target="_blank">Spain.info</a> is used by Spain&#8217;s tourism board to promote visitors to come to Spain.</p>
<p>.info is an unrestricted domain, meaning that anyone can obtain a second-level domain under .info. As a generic, unrestricted domain name, anyone can use .info for any purpose, similar to .com, .net or .org domains. This is in contrast to a TLD such as .edu or .coop, which comes with criteria. .info is the first and only top-level domain that was explicitly created and chartered for unrestricted use, though various other TLDs have ended up that way as a de facto situation. .info means information in about 37 languages around the world, and is a neutral name. Afilias has been aggressive in its marketing of .info, with significant registrar incentives and outreach events.</p>
<p>The .info domain has been operated since its creation by Afilias. In 2003, .info was the first gTLD domain to support IETF standards-based internationalized domain names, as described at .info IDN. Registrations are processed via accredited registrars and internationalized domain names may also be registered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-319111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-319111</guid>
		<description>There is one more .info domain which absolutely normal and it's doing business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one more .info domain which absolutely normal and it&#8217;s doing business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rim</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-285468</link>
		<dc:creator>rim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-285468</guid>
		<description>... Maybe a little late to reply, but still. 
I registered the .info for my main project after seing the .net taken and parked by "marketers". I had the .com and .org already, and, while the .biz (and all others) didn't interest me, I wasn't about to spit on a domain registrars were throwing at me for nearly nothing. 
I see it more as a complement to the .com, where I'll host a satellite informative website, without cluttering the .com with unnecessary pages. I could have done that with subdomains, I know, but then I just wouldn't have bothered making the content.  
If that makes me a brand masochist, well, too bad. 

As far as I am concerned, I don't care much about the .info being the den of spam. If it can be even remotely useful, then I'll use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Maybe a little late to reply, but still.<br />
I registered the .info for my main project after seing the .net taken and parked by &#8220;marketers&#8221;. I had the .com and .org already, and, while the .biz (and all others) didn&#8217;t interest me, I wasn&#8217;t about to spit on a domain registrars were throwing at me for nearly nothing.<br />
I see it more as a complement to the .com, where I&#8217;ll host a satellite informative website, without cluttering the .com with unnecessary pages. I could have done that with subdomains, I know, but then I just wouldn&#8217;t have bothered making the content.<br />
If that makes me a brand <acronym title="masochist">*********</acronym>, well, too bad. </p>
<p>As far as I am concerned, I don&#8217;t care much about the .info being the den of spam. If it can be even remotely useful, then I&#8217;ll use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M.</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-102626</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-102626</guid>
		<description>and its co-branded with the much longer URL
http://www.seaworldohiomemories.us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and its co-branded with the much longer URL<br />
<a href="http://www.seaworldohiomemories.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.seaworldohiomemories.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M.</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-102625</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-102625</guid>
		<description>My website is a site to remember the good times that people had back in the 1970s, 80s and 90s when SeaWorld of Ohio was as popular as the other 3 in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My website is a site to remember the good times that people had back in the 1970s, 80s and 90s when SeaWorld of Ohio was as popular as the other 3 in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Barton</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-101174</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-101174</guid>
		<description>.info can be a great extension -- esp. when a short name is needed (microbes.info) and other extensions are taken/used.

Besides, if it's good enough for Cal Tech (AlbertEinstein.info), I imagine it is good enough for most of us (but apparently not you). They don't strike me as being "spammers, brand masochists, or misinformed" --I think they have proven to be a fairly bright bunch over there in Pasadena.

In fact, they obviously used their intelligence to bypass the (no doubt exorbitant) prices the speculators are surely trying to get for AlbertEinstein.com/net. 

Frankly, in this and other cases, I actually prefer the .info (there are a number of Medical, Health and Science sites that benefit from using .info).

Open your eyes and stop denigrating what can be a terrific domain extension.

For the record, I personally own many dot.coms and prefer them for most situations, but I also own some very strong .info domains (and .tv), and I'd have to say I'm VERY happy to own them, and plan on developing them in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.info can be a great extension &#8212; esp. when a short name is needed (<a href="http://microbes.info" title="http://microbes.info" target="_blank">microbes.info</a>) and other extensions are taken/used.</p>
<p>Besides, if it&#8217;s good enough for Cal Tech (<a href="http://AlbertEinstein.info" title="http://AlbertEinstein.info" target="_blank">AlbertEinstein.info</a>), I imagine it is good enough for most of us (but apparently not you). They don&#8217;t strike me as being &#8220;spammers, brand masochists, or misinformed&#8221; &#8211;I think they have proven to be a fairly bright bunch over there in Pasadena.</p>
<p>In fact, they obviously used their intelligence to bypass the (no doubt exorbitant) prices the speculators are surely trying to get for <a href="http://AlbertEinstein.com/net." title="http://AlbertEinstein.com/net." target="_blank">AlbertEinstein.com/net.</a> </p>
<p>Frankly, in this and other cases, I actually prefer the .info (there are a number of Medical, Health and Science sites that benefit from using .info).</p>
<p>Open your eyes and stop denigrating what can be a terrific domain extension.</p>
<p>For the record, I personally own many <a href="http://dot.com" title="http://dot.com" target="_blank">dot.com</a>s and prefer them for most situations, but I also own some very strong .info domains (and .tv), and I&#8217;d have to say I&#8217;m VERY happy to own them, and plan on developing them in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristi S. - Links to interesting news</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-87803</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristi S. - Links to interesting news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-87803</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]  [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...]  [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Say No to .INFO</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/info-domains-are-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-83786</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Say No to .INFO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/17/info-domains-are-dead/#comment-83786</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] So, let me make this really clear. The .INFO is a domain extension that is used primarily by spammers due to the high availability of desirable domains and low cost of registration. If you register a .INFO domain, and then send out the URL to anyone via email, there is a very strong chance of it getting blocked. The saddest case of this I've seen is a particular free email filter that appends its own URL to each email users subsequently send out. That is to say, each message has "We got free mail filtering - see www.ourfreemailfilter.info to find out more" (the URL has been changed to protect the guilty). Messages including the .INFO domain are seen by SpamButcher as similar to messages containing large .GIF files or originating from Nigeria. It knows they aren't always spam, but there's a real good chance they are. SpamButcher knows about this particular provider, and we take efforts not to block their users. I don't know much about the company - but they appear at least on the surface to be legitimate. Most other spam utilities have data sets that probably don't allow this exception. I have to suspect most users of this service are having a good chunk of their mail blocked. What's frustrating is that anyone who's familiar with spam should really know this. I have no idea what kind of drugs they were on when picking the domain. Maybe the marketing department is at fault. So, if you're registering a new URL - spend the extra $10 / year to get a .COM domain. That is, if you like using email. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] So, let me make this really clear. The .INFO is a domain extension that is used primarily by spammers due to the high availability of desirable domains and low cost of registration. If you register a .INFO domain, and then send out the URL to anyone via email, there is a very strong chance of it getting blocked. The saddest case of this I&#8217;ve seen is a particular free email filter that appends its own URL to each email users subsequently send out. That is to say, each message has &#8220;We got free mail filtering - see <a href="http://www.ourfreemailfilter.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.ourfreemailfilter.info</a> to find out more&#8221; (the URL has been changed to protect the guilty). Messages including the .INFO domain are seen by SpamButcher as similar to messages containing large .GIF files or originating from Nigeria. It knows they aren&#8217;t always spam, but there&#8217;s a real good chance they are. SpamButcher knows about this particular provider, and we take efforts not to block their users. I don&#8217;t know much about the company - but they appear at least on the surface to be legitimate. Most other spam utilities have data sets that probably don&#8217;t allow this exception. I have to suspect most users of this service are having a good chunk of their mail blocked. What&#8217;s frustrating is that anyone who&#8217;s familiar with spam should really know this. I have no idea what kind of drugs they were on when picking the domain. Maybe the marketing department is at fault. So, if you&#8217;re registering a new URL - spend the extra $10 / year to get a .COM domain. That is, if you like using email. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
