<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ignore the Windows Apologists</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: jeanannd</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-643600</link> <dc:creator>jeanannd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-643600</guid> <description>I updated Windows XP SP2 to SP3 - who needs VISTA when XP3 is faster, troublefree and I have no trouble with hardware
interfacing - someting VISTA is still having problems with.Now rumors say that Microsoft itself has given up on VISTA, much like Windows ME of the past.   They plan on giving us a new OS years earlier then planned - to replace VISTA.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I updated Windows XP SP2 to SP3 &#8211; who needs VISTA when XP3 is faster, troublefree and I have no trouble with hardware<br
/> interfacing &#8211; someting VISTA is still having problems with.</p><p>Now rumors say that Microsoft itself has given up on VISTA, much like Windows ME of the past.   They plan on giving us a new OS years earlier then planned &#8211; to replace VISTA.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: UncleJohn</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-515931</link> <dc:creator>UncleJohn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:20:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-515931</guid> <description>When it comes down to the issues that are facing windows in this &quot;Next Gen&quot; of operating system, the question really is what MS has done to promote third partys such as HP,Logitec,(dare I say it?) Lexmark, what has MS done to give these manufacturers to name a few, the tools to adapt to the new system, and in turn what has MS done to back up there play?Seeing others use Vista, and having no crash issues at all, other then problems with there third party software, it leaves me to believe that at its core the OS is just fine. Apologizing? I think not.Apple right now is the lead contender in the rush of &quot;new gen&quot; to coin the phrase. If they continue to play there cards right, Vista might become the minority in homes, instead of the common place. Already I have seen countless new Mac Pro&#039;s at the cafe&#039;s around town, where once I would have seen HP notebooks, and dells. I think its a clear sign the tide is turning, and Microsoft needs a kick in the rear.Now im not implying that Apple is the only choice, im just stating that for the average user who does not want to contend with alot of head aches, OSX seems to be there best course of action.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes down to the issues that are facing windows in this &#8220;Next Gen&#8221; of operating system, the question really is what MS has done to promote third partys such as HP,Logitec,(dare I say it?) Lexmark, what has MS done to give these manufacturers to name a few, the tools to adapt to the new system, and in turn what has MS done to back up there play?</p><p>Seeing others use Vista, and having no crash issues at all, other then problems with there third party software, it leaves me to believe that at its core the OS is just fine. Apologizing? I think not.</p><p>Apple right now is the lead contender in the rush of &#8220;new gen&#8221; to coin the phrase. If they continue to play there cards right, Vista might become the minority in homes, instead of the common place. Already I have seen countless new Mac Pro&#8217;s at the cafe&#8217;s around town, where once I would have seen HP notebooks, and dells. I think its a clear sign the tide is turning, and Microsoft needs a kick in the rear.</p><p> Now im not implying that Apple is the only choice, im just stating that for the average user who does not want to contend with alot of head aches, OSX seems to be there best course of action.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-49770</link> <dc:creator>Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:12:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-49770</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Why Vista&#039;s UI Isn&#039;t Cooler, or Take a Deep Breath Chris  Posted Saturday, September 16, 2006 2:58 AM by Robert McLaws &#124; 11 Comments Filed under: User Interface  Larry Osterman (ya, the same Larry Osterman that got bit by the Audio bug) has a great post on why XGL isn&#039;t as useful as Chris Pirillo thinks it is. Can you imagine the tech support calls from the receptionist at XYZ Paper Company in Diluth, complaining that her app keeps crashing when it&#039;s really on the other side of the &quot;desktop cube&quot;?  I&#039;ve said it before, and I&#039;ll say it again: OS X can afford to take creative liberties with it&#039;s OS&#039; visual stylings&#160;because a) most of its users are right-brained creative types that value visual appearance over usefulness, b) its userbase is so small that drastic changes only have minimal overall&#160;impact, and c) even fewer businesses rely on Macs, so the retraining issues there are minimal as well. The bottom line is, pretty does not always equal practical. Plus, Microsoft has other considerations, like the financial impact of UI changes on companies adopting their software. (Too bad calculating this impact is not as simple as it was in 1995). The Windows UI is the victim of Microsoft&#039;s monopoly success on the desktop, plain and simple. I would think that, being a savvy businessman, Chris would understand this. Personally, I think Chris has a lot of valuable things to say (and while singling out Chris, I&#039;m also speaking to other UI detractors as well).&#160;As well founded as his UI gripes may be,&#160;his feedback on Vista would be far more valuable if he accepted the reality of the situation and focused on problems that actually stand a chance of getting fixed at this point in the game. Acknowledging the fact that Microsoft has made huge strides in the fit &amp; finish department might also be appropriate. Share this post [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Vista&#8217;s UI Isn&#8217;t Cooler, or Take a Deep Breath Chris  Posted Saturday, September 16, 2006 2:58 AM by Robert McLaws | 11 Comments Filed under: User Interface  Larry Osterman (ya, the same Larry Osterman that got bit by the Audio bug) has a great post on why XGL isn&#8217;t as useful as Chris Pirillo thinks it is. Can you imagine the tech support calls from the receptionist at XYZ Paper Company in Diluth, complaining that her app keeps crashing when it&#8217;s really on the other side of the &#8220;desktop cube&#8221;?  I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again: OS X can afford to take creative liberties with it&#8217;s OS&#8217; visual stylings&nbsp;because a) most of its users are right-brained creative types that value visual appearance over usefulness, b) its userbase is so small that drastic changes only have minimal overall&nbsp;impact, and c) even fewer businesses rely on Macs, so the retraining issues there are minimal as well. The bottom line is, pretty does not always equal practical. Plus, Microsoft has other considerations, like the financial impact of UI changes on companies adopting their software. (Too bad calculating this impact is not as simple as it was in 1995). The Windows UI is the victim of Microsoft&#8217;s monopoly success on the desktop, plain and simple. I would think that, being a savvy businessman, Chris would understand this. Personally, I think Chris has a lot of valuable things to say (and while singling out Chris, I&#8217;m also speaking to other UI detractors as well).&nbsp;As well founded as his UI gripes may be,&nbsp;his feedback on Vista would be far more valuable if he accepted the reality of the situation and focused on problems that actually stand a chance of getting fixed at this point in the game. Acknowledging the fact that Microsoft has made huge strides in the fit &amp; finish department might also be appropriate. Share this post [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon May</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-46254</link> <dc:creator>Jon May</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:50:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-46254</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathy: &#8220;I really donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t care too much about Ã¢â‚¬Å“UI consistencyÃ¢â‚¬Â?. For example, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m *glad* that Office 2007 has a whole new UI thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s inconsistent with the HIG.&#8221;</p><p>I take it that you won&#8217;t be using Outlook in Office 2007 then?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ignore os apologistas do Windows - Macsin</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-39175</link> <dc:creator>Ignore os apologistas do Windows - Macsin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:15:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-39175</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Pirillo    Retirado de &quot;http://www.macsin.com/wikimedia/index.php?title=Ignore_os_apologistas_do_Windows&quot; Page categories: 11 Setembro2006 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pirillo    Retirado de &#8220;http://www.macsin.com/wikimedia/index.php?title=Ignore_os_apologistas_do_Windows&#8221; Page categories: 11 Setembro2006 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Swimming in the Pensieve &#187; Evolution on windoze</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-38437</link> <dc:creator>Swimming in the Pensieve &#187; Evolution on windoze</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-38437</guid> <description>[...] (Frankly, in reading through many of Chris&#8217; log entries, I have to wonder about somebody who sees so many problems with windoze; yet, and stays with it anyway, referring to himself: &#8220;As a Windows evangelist,&#8230;&#8221; . Don&#8217;t get me wrong, because I&#8217;m really not criticizing the kid, you see, it&#8217;s just that that kind of behaviour really makes me wonder.) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Frankly, in reading through many of Chris&#8217; log entries, I have to wonder about somebody who sees so many problems with windoze; yet, and stays with it anyway, referring to himself: &#8220;As a Windows evangelist,&#8230;&#8221; . Don&#8217;t get me wrong, because I&#8217;m really not criticizing the kid, you see, it&#8217;s just that that kind of behaviour really makes me wonder.) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joseph A Nagy Jr</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-37524</link> <dc:creator>Joseph A Nagy Jr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-37524</guid> <description>Or we could just work on making the Linux DEs that much better and get free, working software all the time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or we could just work on making the Linux DEs that much better and get free, working software all the time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rahrens</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-37364</link> <dc:creator>rahrens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:47:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-37364</guid> <description>Cathy;If you laugh over the &quot;uncritical fawning&quot; over anything Apple, try looking at the forums at MacNN or the Mac Observer sometime.  ThinkSecret is another one where mac users wade in on Apple at the slightest issue where we think Apple has gone wrong.Want to know some of the issues?  Try quality/repair issues, or the consistant interface issue.  A lot of us think Apple charges too much for their RAM and don&#039;t put enough in the stock Macs sold.  A lot of ire is spent on applications and things we&#039;d like to see Apple correct or add.Unfortunately, the &quot;uncritical fawning&quot; you hear is when we get on PC sites.  There is a hard core of Mac fanatics (face it, we use that term too) that act just like you say and won&#039;t hear anybody critical of Apple say anything they don&#039;t like.Most of us aren&#039;t like that.  What most of us really don&#039;t like (and earns us the same fanatic label) is listening to Windows apologists slam Apple without really knowing or understanding what they&#039;re talking about.  If you make a reasoned argument from a position of knowledge, there are plenty of us who like Macs (and also use Windows) that will be glad to engage in a reasoned discussion of the issue with you.  It&#039;s when people make crazy statements without any attempt to understand the issues involved that we get irate.Yeah, we bash Microsoft.  It&#039; cause many of us have used (or do use) Windows and other MS products and know and understand what crap it mostly is, and also understand that the reason it is is because of the monopoly status MS has that allows them to produce it and still maintain a monopoly market share.Face it, MS is a monopoly, and it will attract its share of attacks based upon that status and how that status allows it to act.  Monopolies rarely respond adequately to their markets;  they don&#039;t have to.  By definition, a monopoly is the only place a customer has to go to buy what they want and need, so customer service is not a mark of your typical monopoly.  So a lot of people react negatively to them because of that status.  And because Microsoft acts like the typical monopoly, they attract their share of detractors, especially now that Apple is increasingly viewed as a viable alternative to the Microsoft monopoly.I don&#039;t like the idiotic comments made in forums such as this by the fanatics on either side, but at least I try to understand them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathy;</p><p>If you laugh over the &#8220;uncritical fawning&#8221; over anything Apple, try looking at the forums at MacNN or the Mac Observer sometime.  ThinkSecret is another one where mac users wade in on Apple at the slightest issue where we think Apple has gone wrong.</p><p>Want to know some of the issues?  Try quality/repair issues, or the consistant interface issue.  A lot of us think Apple charges too much for their RAM and don&#8217;t put enough in the stock Macs sold.  A lot of ire is spent on applications and things we&#8217;d like to see Apple correct or add.</p><p>Unfortunately, the &#8220;uncritical fawning&#8221; you hear is when we get on PC sites.  There is a hard core of Mac fanatics (face it, we use that term too) that act just like you say and won&#8217;t hear anybody critical of Apple say anything they don&#8217;t like.</p><p>Most of us aren&#8217;t like that.  What most of us really don&#8217;t like (and earns us the same fanatic label) is listening to Windows apologists slam Apple without really knowing or understanding what they&#8217;re talking about.  If you make a reasoned argument from a position of knowledge, there are plenty of us who like Macs (and also use Windows) that will be glad to engage in a reasoned discussion of the issue with you.  It&#8217;s when people make crazy statements without any attempt to understand the issues involved that we get irate.</p><p>Yeah, we bash Microsoft.  It&#8217; cause many of us have used (or do use) Windows and other MS products and know and understand what crap it mostly is, and also understand that the reason it is is because of the monopoly status MS has that allows them to produce it and still maintain a monopoly market share.</p><p>Face it, MS is a monopoly, and it will attract its share of attacks based upon that status and how that status allows it to act.  Monopolies rarely respond adequately to their markets;  they don&#8217;t have to.  By definition, a monopoly is the only place a customer has to go to buy what they want and need, so customer service is not a mark of your typical monopoly.  So a lot of people react negatively to them because of that status.  And because Microsoft acts like the typical monopoly, they attract their share of detractors, especially now that Apple is increasingly viewed as a viable alternative to the Microsoft monopoly.</p><p>I don&#8217;t like the idiotic comments made in forums such as this by the fanatics on either side, but at least I try to understand them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diego Barros</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-37333</link> <dc:creator>Diego Barros</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:35:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-37333</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tiger may have a prettier interface, but it looks as though Vista will manage to deliver this feature firstÃ¢â‚¬â€œin the form of the Previous Versions dialog.Ã¢â‚¬Â?</p><p>In the form of the Previous Versions dialog. Right there you have the difference between the way Apple and Microsoft do things. How lame and boring is it to have the Previous Versions Dialog?! Have you seen Time Machine in action? It&#8217;s much more impressive when you see it working. It&#8217;s not an extra tab on a file&#8217;s properties. Time Machine looks like each app going back in time! Only Apple could do backup like this.</p><p>As for Vista having it first. You&#8217;re assuming Vista&#8217;s release date is still as last updated. :)</p><p>As Chris has been saying, the Vista UI is all over the place. Like someone stuffed their mouth full of M&amp;Ms and threw up on your monitor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cathy</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-37226</link> <dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 04:15:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-37226</guid> <description>Regarding Louderback&#039;s gushing over &quot;Time Machine&quot;, he obviously doesn&#039;t pay attention the other stuff that appears on zd sites (I think that eweek is a zd site).Eweek.com has a screen shot of Vista&#039;s &quot;Previous Versions&quot; dialog box with the caption, &quot;The Time Machine feature set to ship with Mac OS X
Tiger may have a prettier interface, but it looks as though Vista will
manage to deliver this feature first--in the form of the Previous
Versions dialog.&quot;
http://www.eweek.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205,l=&amp;s=27380&amp;a=187225&amp;po=18,00.aspNot that I have anything against Macs, I have one.  But I laugh at the uncritical fawning over anything Apple, when I know they deserve much criticism, and am annoyed at the bashing of MS as if they deserver nothing but criticism.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Louderback&#8217;s gushing over &#8220;Time Machine&#8221;, he obviously doesn&#8217;t pay attention the other stuff that appears on zd sites (I think that eweek is a zd site).</p><p><a
href="http://Eweek.com" title="http://Eweek.com" target="_blank">Eweek.com</a> has a screen shot of Vista&#8217;s &#8220;Previous Versions&#8221; dialog box with the caption, &#8220;The Time Machine feature set to ship with Mac OS X<br
/> Tiger may have a prettier interface, but it looks as though Vista will<br
/> manage to deliver this feature first&#8211;in the form of the Previous<br
/> Versions dialog.&#8221;<br
/> <a
href="http://www.eweek.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205,l=&amp;s=27380&amp;a=187225&amp;po=18,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.eweek.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205,l=&amp;s=27380&amp;a=187225&amp;po=18,00.asp</a></p><p>Not that I have anything against Macs, I have one.  But I laugh at the uncritical fawning over anything Apple, when I know they deserve much criticism, and am annoyed at the bashing of MS as if they deserver nothing but criticism.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cathy</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-37215</link> <dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:36:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-37215</guid> <description>By the way, Chris, I think it&#039;s in very bad form to resort to name calling.  Just because someone disagrees with you doesn&#039;t make them an &quot;apologist&quot;.  Just like because you disagree with them doesn&#039;t make you a &quot;whiner&quot; (which is what I saw many calling you in the &quot;Vista is sith&quot; thread).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Chris, I think it&#8217;s in very bad form to resort to name calling.  Just because someone disagrees with you doesn&#8217;t make them an &#8220;apologist&#8221;.  Just like because you disagree with them doesn&#8217;t make you a &#8220;whiner&#8221; (which is what I saw many calling you in the &#8220;Vista is sith&#8221; thread).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cathy</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-37211</link> <dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:34:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-37211</guid> <description>I really don&#039;t care too much about &quot;UI consistency&quot;.  For example, I&#039;m *glad* that Office 2007 has a whole new UI that&#039;s inconsistent with the HIG.But sure, for those hung up on this sort of thing, MS should use consistent UI across the bundles applets (but not go overboard if a certain app works better by being inconstent with the others).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t care too much about &#8220;UI consistency&#8221;.  For example, I&#8217;m *glad* that Office 2007 has a whole new UI that&#8217;s inconsistent with the HIG.</p><p>But sure, for those hung up on this sort of thing, MS should use consistent UI across the bundles applets (but not go overboard if a certain app works better by being inconstent with the others).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shawn Oster</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-36700</link> <dc:creator>Shawn Oster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:22:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-36700</guid> <description>Ah-frick&#039;n-men.  There are a great many wonderful things in Vista and in many areas it&#039;s a huge leap forward but at the same time it *still* feels like an application created by engineers, people that lack either the UI ability or caring to tighten things up.  The thing that suprises me is that a ton of these little things could be taken care of by an intern assigned to each department whose whole job is making sure the UI matches 100% throughout the entire OS.Vista RC1 still feels like a suit you&#039;d buy from Target vs. going to a tailor.  There is nothing really wrong with a $100 suit jacket but if you look at it you&#039;ll find puckered seams, loose threads, fabric grain that doesn&#039;t lay quite right and probably makes your ass look big.  If you look at the $1000 suit jacket it is made of wonderful wool, every stitch is secure, it lays just right, will last you a lifetime and you will look amazing in it.  Oh, did I mention it&#039;s lightweight, unlike Vista?  Vista just went from Target to Super Target, now with groceries!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah-frick&#8217;n-men.  There are a great many wonderful things in Vista and in many areas it&#8217;s a huge leap forward but at the same time it *still* feels like an application created by engineers, people that lack either the UI ability or caring to tighten things up.  The thing that suprises me is that a ton of these little things could be taken care of by an intern assigned to each department whose whole job is making sure the UI matches 100% throughout the entire OS.</p><p>Vista RC1 still feels like a suit you&#8217;d buy from Target vs. going to a tailor.  There is nothing really wrong with a $100 suit jacket but if you look at it you&#8217;ll find puckered seams, loose threads, fabric grain that doesn&#8217;t lay quite right and probably makes your ass look big.  If you look at the $1000 suit jacket it is made of wonderful wool, every stitch is secure, it lays just right, will last you a lifetime and you will look amazing in it.  Oh, did I mention it&#8217;s lightweight, unlike Vista?  Vista just went from Target to Super Target, now with groceries!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Windows-Now.com - Blogs</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-60173</link> <dc:creator>Windows-Now.com - Blogs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-60173</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; success on the desktop, plain and simple.  I would think that, being a savvy businessman, Chris would understand this. Personally, I think Chris has a lot of valuable things to say. As well founded as his UI gripes may be, his feedback on Vista would be far more valuable if he accepted the reality of the situation and focused on problems that actually stand a chance of getting fixed at this point in the game. Acknowledging the fact that Microsoft has made&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> success on the desktop, plain and simple.  I would think that, being a savvy businessman, Chris would understand this. Personally, I think Chris has a lot of valuable things to say. As well founded as his UI gripes may be, his feedback on Vista would be far more valuable if he accepted the reality of the situation and focused on problems that actually stand a chance of getting fixed at this point in the game. Acknowledging the fact that Microsoft has made</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wannabegeekblog</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/ignore-the-windows-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-60172</link> <dc:creator>wannabegeekblog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/09/05/ignore-the-windows-apologists/#comment-60172</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; success on the desktop, plain and simple.  I would think that, being a savvy businessman, Chris would understand this. Personally, I think Chris has a lot of valuable things to say. As well founded as his UI gripes may be, his feedback on Vista would be far more valuable if he accepted the reality of the situation and focused on problems that actually stand a chance of getting fixed at this point in the game. Acknowledging the fact that Microsoft has made&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> success on the desktop, plain and simple.  I would think that, being a savvy businessman, Chris would understand this. Personally, I think Chris has a lot of valuable things to say. As well founded as his UI gripes may be, his feedback on Vista would be far more valuable if he accepted the reality of the situation and focused on problems that actually stand a chance of getting fixed at this point in the game. Acknowledging the fact that Microsoft has made</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.032 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-25 02:02:56 -->