<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How Does Your Web Browser Handle JavaScript?</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/how-does-your-web-browser-handle-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/how-does-your-web-browser-handle-javascript/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Barbara</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/how-does-your-web-browser-handle-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-690191</link> <dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=8750#comment-690191</guid> <description>Having had lots of trouble running IE brouser with microsoft Java i loaded Sun Microsystems Java and had no more problems with IE , at least no Java problems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had lots of trouble running IE brouser with microsoft Java i loaded Sun Microsystems Java and had no more problems with IE , at least no Java problems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/how-does-your-web-browser-handle-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-690035</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:52:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=8750#comment-690035</guid> <description>If this is the future of the Web, it&#039;ll be a bleak future for many of us. Although javascript is an indispensable tool for enhancing user experience, it is not a suitable development platform. Google is among those pushing for this AJAX-driven world, and I think it&#039;s a mistake.Progressive enhancement is the only sensible future for Web development. Look to &quot;A List Apart&quot; and &quot;SitePoint&quot; for a full description of what that means, if you&#039;re uncertain. The bottom line is that lower-level functionality must be preserved when enhancements are added.One problem with javascript is that it requires local processing. It&#039;s fine to put heavy demands on the end user who is running a high-end machine, but what about others? Server-side solutions like ColdFusion and PHP make much more sense in almost any context. Inevitably, developers promote complexity rather than simplicity; and inevitably, the end user wants content to be delivered NOW. The dynamic tension between these two must be acknowledged and respected in the design process.And what about those who code javascript maliciously to open unwanted windows, etc.? Ultimately, end users can only control this by denying scripts, selectively or altogether. When the provocations are persistent enough, they will.Trust me. Heavy reliance on javascript does not bode well for anyone. It is a great tool, but not a good foundation for development.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is the future of the Web, it&#8217;ll be a bleak future for many of us. Although javascript is an indispensable tool for enhancing user experience, it is not a suitable development platform. Google is among those pushing for this AJAX-driven world, and I think it&#8217;s a mistake.</p><p>Progressive enhancement is the only sensible future for Web development. Look to &#8220;A List Apart&#8221; and &#8220;SitePoint&#8221; for a full description of what that means, if you&#8217;re uncertain. The bottom line is that lower-level functionality must be preserved when enhancements are added.</p><p>One problem with javascript is that it requires local processing. It&#8217;s fine to put heavy demands on the end user who is running a high-end machine, but what about others? Server-side solutions like ColdFusion and PHP make much more sense in almost any context. Inevitably, developers promote complexity rather than simplicity; and inevitably, the end user wants content to be delivered NOW. The dynamic tension between these two must be acknowledged and respected in the design process.</p><p>And what about those who code javascript maliciously to open unwanted windows, etc.? Ultimately, end users can only control this by denying scripts, selectively or altogether. When the provocations are persistent enough, they will.</p><p>Trust me. Heavy reliance on javascript does not bode well for anyone. It is a great tool, but not a good foundation for development.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barrington</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/how-does-your-web-browser-handle-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-690012</link> <dc:creator>Barrington</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:47:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=8750#comment-690012</guid> <description>Strangely, for me Chrome is slower than Firefox with Google Analytics!  Surprised to hear its JavaScript performance is meant to be that much faster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely, for me Chrome is slower than Firefox with Google Analytics!  Surprised to hear its JavaScript performance is meant to be that much faster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: About Halloween - Geeks!</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/how-does-your-web-browser-handle-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-690011</link> <dc:creator>About Halloween - Geeks!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:58:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/?p=8750#comment-690011</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] How Does Your Web Browser Handle JavaScript? [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Does Your Web Browser Handle JavaScript? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/24 queries in 0.102 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.62 @ 2009-11-25 02:17:39 -->