<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Halo 2 in 32-Bit or 64-Bit Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/halo-2-in-32-bit-or-64-bit-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/halo-2-in-32-bit-or-64-bit-vista/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nellster1</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/halo-2-in-32-bit-or-64-bit-vista/#comment-556199</link>
		<dc:creator>Nellster1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/24/halo-2-in-32-bit-or-64-bit-vista/#comment-556199</guid>
		<description>32 bit software is emulated on 64 bit OS so the answer is no, no performance changes on halo 2, unless they actualy make a 64 bit version of halo 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32 bit software is emulated on 64 bit OS so the answer is no, no performance changes on halo 2, unless they actualy make a 64 bit version of halo 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woolf2k</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/halo-2-in-32-bit-or-64-bit-vista/#comment-537839</link>
		<dc:creator>woolf2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/08/24/halo-2-in-32-bit-or-64-bit-vista/#comment-537839</guid>
		<description>chances are that it&#039;ll run on a 64-bit OS. 

but isn&#039;t he asking if it&#039;ll run better? 

and the most likely answer is NO. since the game is written in 32bit it wont take advantage of the additional speed the 64 bit intruction set will give it. AND it has to go through that WOW32 (this makes it possible for 32bit apps to run on Vista64) process in Vista...

so even if it runs, changes are it wont run better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chances are that it&#8217;ll run on a 64-bit OS. </p>
<p>but isn&#8217;t he asking if it&#8217;ll run better? </p>
<p>and the most likely answer is NO. since the game is written in 32bit it wont take advantage of the additional speed the 64 bit intruction set will give it. AND it has to go through that WOW32 (this makes it possible for 32bit apps to run on Vista64) process in Vista&#8230;</p>
<p>so even if it runs, changes are it wont run better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.389 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 328/332 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-16 13:32:21 -->
