<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Desktop Search vs Windows Vista Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Hatem</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-742682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Hatem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-742682</guid>
		<description>thankess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thankess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Paddock</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-395717</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Paddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-395717</guid>
		<description>If you have problems or suggestions for Windows Desktop Search (including Vista), please share them!

There&#039;s are good forums here:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=847&amp;SiteID=1

and

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=113&amp;SiteID=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have problems or suggestions for Windows Desktop Search (including Vista), please share them!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s are good forums here:<br />
<a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=847&#038;SiteID=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=847&#038;SiteID=1</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=113&#038;SiteID=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=113&#038;SiteID=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc klink</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391989</link>
		<dc:creator>marc klink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391989</guid>
		<description>As above, I use X1. I look at the reviews of Copernic, which I have never installed, but it seems that the users on CNet that rate it, and this is where your link points, have never tried X1. The one mention of X1, in 24 reviews, is a person who stayed with X1 after trying Copernic. 

I chose X1 after reading a review several months ago, somewhere on ZDNet. It rated X1 best, over all the others, including Copernic. That was good enough for me. I recommend it for customer&#039;s machines, as it will work comfortably on a slower [</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As above, I use X1. I look at the reviews of Copernic, which I have never installed, but it seems that the users on CNet that rate it, and this is where your link points, have never tried X1. The one mention of X1, in 24 reviews, is a person who stayed with X1 after trying Copernic. </p>
<p>I chose X1 after reading a review several months ago, somewhere on ZDNet. It rated X1 best, over all the others, including Copernic. That was good enough for me. I recommend it for customer&#8217;s machines, as it will work comfortably on a slower [</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhevron</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391848</link>
		<dc:creator>dhevron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391848</guid>
		<description>No doubt...X1 beats them all! It is the most versital interface of all of them.  Copernic would be my 2nd choice.  

One of the problems with both of these products is the lack of searching Microsoft OneNote.  Unfortunately, Windows Desktop search has to be installed to search OneNote; otherwise, I would uninstall the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt&#8230;X1 beats them all! It is the most versital interface of all of them.  Copernic would be my 2nd choice.  </p>
<p>One of the problems with both of these products is the lack of searching Microsoft OneNote.  Unfortunately, Windows Desktop search has to be installed to search OneNote; otherwise, I would uninstall the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DinoHorse</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391557</link>
		<dc:creator>DinoHorse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391557</guid>
		<description>I have tried them all.. My favorite in terms of elegance is Copernic, but in terms of ease of use and performance is X1... Yahoo and MS and Vista one are really horrible....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried them all.. My favorite in terms of elegance is Copernic, but in terms of ease of use and performance is X1&#8230; Yahoo and MS and Vista one are really horrible&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391541</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-391541</guid>
		<description>I was running Google Desktop for months, until my already slow as molasse laptop decided to have a little seizures anytime I had to open up software more complicated than Microsoft Word. Since I dropped it, there have probably been four times that I wish I still had it installed, and all of those times the amount of effort it took to search for the information was still less than the lag that Google Desktop was creating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was running Google Desktop for months, until my already slow as molasse laptop decided to have a little seizures anytime I had to open up software more complicated than Microsoft Word. Since I dropped it, there have probably been four times that I wish I still had it installed, and all of those times the amount of effort it took to search for the information was still less than the lag that Google Desktop was creating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chris Pirillo Show</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-452029</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chris Pirillo Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-452029</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; [IMG] Chris Pirillo Google Desktop Search vs Windows Vista Search  Safari on Windows? Yawn.  Spark Plugs vs Pulse Plugs  Pac Man: A Classic  Best Firewall for Internet Security  The Best Podcasting Client for Windows?  Live Video Recordings  Health is Sick  Summer Computer Camp&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> [IMG] Chris Pirillo Google Desktop Search vs Windows Vista Search  Safari on Windows? Yawn.  Spark Plugs vs Pulse Plugs  Pac Man: A Classic  Best Firewall for Internet Security  The Best Podcasting Client for Windows?  Live Video Recordings  Health is Sick  Summer Computer Camp<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Northern Voice</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-657561</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Northern Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-657561</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;above 600MB, as many which do not have anything above that are useless?  Related Content:  Chris DiBona on Google Code at Where 2.0 Searching for Search Matt Cutts of Google on Search Engine Spam Googlefasting: Day 1 Tagging Your Posts for GnomedexGoogle Desktop Search vs Windows Vista SearchBarbara Manning of GenieKnows.com Google Does Blog Search! The New Google Toolbar: Wow Desktop Search   read more&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->above 600MB, as many which do not have anything above that are useless?  Related Content:  Chris DiBona on Google Code at Where 2.0 Searching for Search Matt Cutts of Google on Search Engine Spam Googlefasting: Day 1 Tagging Your Posts for GnomedexGoogle Desktop Search vs Windows Vista SearchBarbara Manning of GenieKnows.com Google Does Blog Search! The New Google Toolbar: Wow Desktop Search   read more<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  SocioBiblog </title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-657562</link>
		<dc:creator> SocioBiblog </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/11/google-desktop-search-vs-windows-vista-search/#comment-657562</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;m finding myself surrounded by an increasing number of media gadgets... Related Content:This Is Really WeirdEric Rice&#039;s MicrophoneDesktop SearchCopernic Desktop Search FeedbackMultiple Monitor MadnessGoogle Desktop Search vs Windows Vista SearchDesktop AquariumISO PowerToy ProgrammersVista Wallpaper TipI 0wn the Software&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->m finding myself surrounded by an increasing number of media gadgets&#8230; Related Content:This Is Really WeirdEric Rice&#8217;s MicrophoneDesktop SearchCopernic Desktop Search FeedbackMultiple Monitor MadnessGoogle Desktop Search vs Windows Vista SearchDesktop AquariumISO PowerToy ProgrammersVista Wallpaper TipI 0wn the Software<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.287 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 405/409 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-16 02:48:24 -->
