<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gigabit Network</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: sivakumar</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/comment-page-1/#comment-589815</link> <dc:creator>sivakumar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-589815</guid> <description>how does the physical construction of cat 5e &amp; Cat 6 cables different from each other?  If one goes through the specifications - it says Cat 6 is 12 times less noisy ??  Also the bandwidth of Cat 6 is twice of Cat 5e ??How is it accomplished ??After all cable is a cable !!!! May be the thickness will change &amp; may be the copper purity may change !!!can any one throw more light on this</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does the physical construction of cat 5e &amp; Cat 6 cables different from each other?  If one goes through the specifications &#8211; it says Cat 6 is 12 times less noisy ??  Also the bandwidth of Cat 6 is twice of Cat 5e ??</p><p>How is it accomplished ??</p><p>After all cable is a cable !!!! May be the thickness will change &amp; may be the copper purity may change !!!</p><p>can any one throw more light on this</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cim</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/comment-page-1/#comment-535765</link> <dc:creator>Cim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535765</guid> <description>I have worked on gigabit (1000Base-T) algorithm and chip development and the 1000Base-T standard (802.3ab) is actually designed to operate up to 100m on Category 5 cable.  One does not necessarily need Cat-5e or Cat-6 to meet these requirements.The major speed improvement in Gigabit Ethernet is accomplished by transmitting and receiving on all four pairs in the cabling (10Base-T and 100Base-TX used only two pairs -- one for TX and one for RX).  It transmits at 125 Mbaud on each pair with an effective 2-bits per symbol.   This gives 4 pairs * 125M sym/sec * 2 bits/sym = 1000 Mbps.One of the major impairments for 1000Base-T operation is something called NEXT (near-end crosstalk) which occurs when data from one pair couples on to another.  This mainly occurs at the jacks/patch panels where the twists in the pair are undone to crimp a RJ-45 jack or attach to a panel.  To maximize performance in a network, one should keep the connections to a panel or jack as short as possible so that each pair is kept twisted as much as possible.  A poor installation will have a much more dramatic effect on 1000Base-T operation than the category type of cabling.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked on gigabit (1000Base-T) algorithm and chip development and the 1000Base-T standard (802.3ab) is actually designed to operate up to 100m on Category 5 cable.  One does not necessarily need Cat-5e or Cat-6 to meet these requirements.</p><p>The major speed improvement in Gigabit Ethernet is accomplished by transmitting and receiving on all four pairs in the cabling (10Base-T and 100Base-TX used only two pairs &#8212; one for TX and one for RX).  It transmits at 125 Mbaud on each pair with an effective 2-bits per symbol.   This gives 4 pairs * 125M sym/sec * 2 bits/sym = 1000 Mbps.</p><p>One of the major impairments for 1000Base-T operation is something called NEXT (near-end crosstalk) which occurs when data from one pair couples on to another.  This mainly occurs at the jacks/patch panels where the twists in the pair are undone to crimp a RJ-45 jack or attach to a panel.  To maximize performance in a network, one should keep the connections to a panel or jack as short as possible so that each pair is kept twisted as much as possible.  A poor installation will have a much more dramatic effect on 1000Base-T operation than the category type of cabling.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jzilla</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/comment-page-1/#comment-535870</link> <dc:creator>Jzilla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:57:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535870</guid> <description>One other thing to keep in mind is that cat 6 cable is not as flexible as cat 5e, as it has an inner core to keep the twisted pairs of wires properly spaced. If cat 6 is bent too much it can have an adverse effect on the throughputs achieved.Having said that it makes more sense to run cat 6 cable if possible as it is usually easier to upgrade the equipment at each end than the cable itself.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing to keep in mind is that cat 6 cable is not as flexible as cat 5e, as it has an inner core to keep the twisted pairs of wires properly spaced. If cat 6 is bent too much it can have an adverse effect on the throughputs achieved.</p><p>Having said that it makes more sense to run cat 6 cable if possible as it is usually easier to upgrade the equipment at each end than the cable itself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Linquist</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/comment-page-1/#comment-535871</link> <dc:creator>Charles Linquist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535871</guid> <description>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#039; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit - definitely useful for moving around video files.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#8242; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit &#8211; definitely useful for moving around video files.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Linquist</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/comment-page-1/#comment-535872</link> <dc:creator>Charles Linquist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535872</guid> <description>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#039; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit - definitely useful for moving around video files.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#8242; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit &#8211; definitely useful for moving around video files.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/26 queries in 0.022 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-24 15:05:00 -->