<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gigabit Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/</link>
	<description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sivakumar</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/#comment-589815</link>
		<dc:creator>sivakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-589815</guid>
		<description>how does the physical construction of cat 5e &amp; Cat 6 cables different from each other?  If one goes through the specifications - it says Cat 6 is 12 times less noisy ??  Also the bandwidth of Cat 6 is twice of Cat 5e ??

How is it accomplished ??

After all cable is a cable !!!! May be the thickness will change &amp; may be the copper purity may change !!!

can any one throw more light on this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does the physical construction of cat 5e &amp; Cat 6 cables different from each other?  If one goes through the specifications &#8211; it says Cat 6 is 12 times less noisy ??  Also the bandwidth of Cat 6 is twice of Cat 5e ??</p>
<p>How is it accomplished ??</p>
<p>After all cable is a cable !!!! May be the thickness will change &amp; may be the copper purity may change !!!</p>
<p>can any one throw more light on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cim</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/#comment-535765</link>
		<dc:creator>Cim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535765</guid>
		<description>I have worked on gigabit (1000Base-T) algorithm and chip development and the 1000Base-T standard (802.3ab) is actually designed to operate up to 100m on Category 5 cable.  One does not necessarily need Cat-5e or Cat-6 to meet these requirements.

The major speed improvement in Gigabit Ethernet is accomplished by transmitting and receiving on all four pairs in the cabling (10Base-T and 100Base-TX used only two pairs -- one for TX and one for RX).  It transmits at 125 Mbaud on each pair with an effective 2-bits per symbol.   This gives 4 pairs * 125M sym/sec * 2 bits/sym = 1000 Mbps.

One of the major impairments for 1000Base-T operation is something called NEXT (near-end crosstalk) which occurs when data from one pair couples on to another.  This mainly occurs at the jacks/patch panels where the twists in the pair are undone to crimp a RJ-45 jack or attach to a panel.  To maximize performance in a network, one should keep the connections to a panel or jack as short as possible so that each pair is kept twisted as much as possible.  A poor installation will have a much more dramatic effect on 1000Base-T operation than the category type of cabling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked on gigabit (1000Base-T) algorithm and chip development and the 1000Base-T standard (802.3ab) is actually designed to operate up to 100m on Category 5 cable.  One does not necessarily need Cat-5e or Cat-6 to meet these requirements.</p>
<p>The major speed improvement in Gigabit Ethernet is accomplished by transmitting and receiving on all four pairs in the cabling (10Base-T and 100Base-TX used only two pairs &#8212; one for TX and one for RX).  It transmits at 125 Mbaud on each pair with an effective 2-bits per symbol.   This gives 4 pairs * 125M sym/sec * 2 bits/sym = 1000 Mbps.</p>
<p>One of the major impairments for 1000Base-T operation is something called NEXT (near-end crosstalk) which occurs when data from one pair couples on to another.  This mainly occurs at the jacks/patch panels where the twists in the pair are undone to crimp a RJ-45 jack or attach to a panel.  To maximize performance in a network, one should keep the connections to a panel or jack as short as possible so that each pair is kept twisted as much as possible.  A poor installation will have a much more dramatic effect on 1000Base-T operation than the category type of cabling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jzilla</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/#comment-535870</link>
		<dc:creator>Jzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535870</guid>
		<description>One other thing to keep in mind is that cat 6 cable is not as flexible as cat 5e, as it has an inner core to keep the twisted pairs of wires properly spaced. If cat 6 is bent too much it can have an adverse effect on the throughputs achieved.

Having said that it makes more sense to run cat 6 cable if possible as it is usually easier to upgrade the equipment at each end than the cable itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing to keep in mind is that cat 6 cable is not as flexible as cat 5e, as it has an inner core to keep the twisted pairs of wires properly spaced. If cat 6 is bent too much it can have an adverse effect on the throughputs achieved.</p>
<p>Having said that it makes more sense to run cat 6 cable if possible as it is usually easier to upgrade the equipment at each end than the cable itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Linquist</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/#comment-535871</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Linquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535871</guid>
		<description>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#039; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit - definitely useful for moving around video files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#8242; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit &#8211; definitely useful for moving around video files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Linquist</title>
		<link>http://chris.pirillo.com/gigabit-network/#comment-535872</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Linquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/06/01/gigabit-network/#comment-535872</guid>
		<description>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#039; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit - definitely useful for moving around video files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 8 years ago, I wired my house with cat5.  Then, 3 years ago, I bought a motherboard that had a gigabit port.   At the same time,  I upgraded all my switches. I now have 7 computers in my house on the gigE network, and all work fine.  Some of my cable runs are 120&#8242; long and I have found no issues whatsoever.  I get transfer speeds about 6 times greater than on 100Mbit &#8211; definitely useful for moving around video files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.314 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 361/365 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: s3.pirillo.com

Served from: chris.pirillo.com @ 2012-02-16 04:55:08 -->
