<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Full Versus Quick</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/full-versus-quick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/full-versus-quick/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Security Forums :: View topic - sasser on xp pro sp2 machine??</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/full-versus-quick/comment-page-1/#comment-66067</link> <dc:creator>Security Forums :: View topic - sasser on xp pro sp2 machine??</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:21:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/29/full-versus-quick/#comment-66067</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Basically, a Full format truly scrubs the disk from  scratch, rebuilds all of the file structures, and checks to make  sure that everything is copasetic. All a Quick format does is lay  down a blank FAT and directory table. This is why a brand-new  unformatted disk can&#039;t be Quick formatted and must receive a Full  format; it needs all of the file structures laid out first, so the  FAT actually has blocks and sectors to track, instead of a  nebulous mess      http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/29/full-versus-quick/  _________________Never argue with stupid people. They just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Basically, a Full format truly scrubs the disk from  scratch, rebuilds all of the file structures, and checks to make  sure that everything is copasetic. All a Quick format does is lay  down a blank FAT and directory table. This is why a brand-new  unformatted disk can&#8217;t be Quick formatted and must receive a Full  format; it needs all of the file structures laid out first, so the  FAT actually has blocks and sectors to track, instead of a  nebulous mess <a
href="http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/29/full-versus-quick/" rel="nofollow">http://chris.pirillo.com/2002/06/29/full-versus-quick/</a> _________________Never argue with stupid people. They just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/21 queries in 0.133 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.62 @ 2009-11-25 09:07:37 -->