Four More Years!
Yeah, you're probably right. The government doesn't lie to us.
What's your #1 source for Internet needs? GoDaddy has new domain names, transfers and renewals as low as $1.99. Plus, check out their hosting plans, Web site builders, secure certificates and much more. Plus, as a listener of The Chris Pirillo Show, enter code CHRIS1 when you check out, and save an additional 10% on any order. Get your piece of the internet at GoDaddy!









40 Comments
Anonymous
September 7th, 2004
at 10:16pm
that's stupid…
unsubstantiated evidence…
a complete joke!
you're better thaqn that, chris
Anonymous
September 7th, 2004
at 10:16pm
that's stupid…
unsubstantiated evidence…
a complete joke!
you're better than that, chris
Anonymous
September 7th, 2004
at 10:28pm
Did you see any wreckage in Pennsylvania? You liberals are the most gullible people in the world.
Anonymous
September 7th, 2004
at 10:32pm
Chris … get back to tech and staff off politics. The California air has made you ignorant. In fact, why do I even subscribe to your blog anymore Â… unsubscribed.
Anonymous
September 7th, 2004
at 11:28pm
if you really believe that men get into to politics to begin with or become president help the country instead of themselves, then you are the one that is gullable.
Jeff
September 7th, 2004
at 11:54pm
Even if one did believe this (which I do not), it would beg the question: What happened to the fourth plane and its passengers? It can't just disappear (if it wasn't disintegrated in the Pentagon). Another question it brings to mind is: Why have the security camera footage never been released, unless it shows something different from what is presumed to really have happened.
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 4:06am
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 4:49am
Chris just likes to get people talking about him even if they're talking about what an idiot he is.
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 9:00am
You don't actually believe that ****, do you Chris?
Let's make this clear: an airplane full of people disappeared that day. If it didn't hit the Pentagon where are all of the passengers?
Also, people saw the airplane fly over the freeway and clip light poles. Were they delussional?
And why bother claiming it was an airplane if it wasn't? If they wanted people to think it was a plane, why not use a plane for real?
Oh, and to the anonymous guy above who said this is a liberal thing, it isn't. It's paranoia, and there are paranoid people on both sides.
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 9:16am
“I read it on the internet so it must be true!”
Cristina
September 8th, 2004
at 4:27pm
Believable or not, I'm still not voting for Bush. ;)
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 6:04pm
So…you're trying to say that we attacked ourselves and not the terrorists? Man…I think the absence of caffeine is having a serious effect on you. Umm….as I can recall…the Pentagon was built to minimize damage if it was attacked…seems like it works. Oh…and the unbroken windows? It's not like they were blast-proof or anything…ya know…the ones they were installing as part of the Pentagon Renovation Program? It's also possible the blast itself could have punched those holes in the wall…
-Nathan
GO BIG DUBYA!!!
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 6:27pm
I was there, in Washington, DC for vacation. I had arrived in Fairfax, VA early that morning, just in time to take transit into Washington, walk around the mall a bit and enjoy what a wonderful day it was. Then I heard about the towers. My day was going south, quickly. Then the airplane. I could see it, I saw that it was indeed a 757. I knew when I saw it something was wrong. It was terrifying. Then as I lost view of the plane over the trees I heard the explosion. I knew the Pentagon was in that area and I figured that was the target. I got my *** out of Washington, back to Fairfax ASAP.
It was supposed to be a week of relaxation after an ugly divorce. Instead, it was horrific and miserable.
Mike P
September 8th, 2004
at 6:27pm
Wow. From the comments IÂ’ve read it looks like Chris shouldnÂ’t even think about questioning our leaders. Especially in an election year. How freakinÂ’ un-American is that?
-Mike
Hank
September 8th, 2004
at 7:21pm
It's all politics. With it being election year, who knows.
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 7:42pm
I don't care if Chris questions his leaders. I'm no fan of Bush either. But questioning whether a Boeing 757 really hit the Pentagon is the same as questioning whether a hurricane really hit Florida. You can say it didn't all you want, it doesn't change the fact that it did.
Anonymous
September 8th, 2004
at 11:13pm
bush 1 was cia director. why cant anyone believe he just might be shady. and as the saying goes, like father-like son. the bush family in general is shady, hell, jr. started arbusto oil with one of bin ladens brothers. go figure. what great presidents to have!
StrobeAlific
September 8th, 2004
at 11:20pm
Chris Pirillo is actually a computer generated animation. He doesn't really exist. “He” only moved to Los Angeles because the studios who create him thought it would be easier to put him in their environment. It was getting to expensive to fly back and forth to Iowa. If you look closely at the animations of this website, you will notice that it looks more lifelike than his webcam photos.
Anonymous
September 9th, 2004
at 10:45am
I hear the Holocaust was all an inside joke after a couple of jewish guys got tatoos while they were drunk they later regreted. They figured it would look better if they blamed Hitler and the Nazi's.
There is a website that says so and everything.
Idiots….
Anonymous
September 9th, 2004
at 12:59pm
Bush senior was the CIA director… Bush junior was the owner of a baseball team.
Anonymous
September 11th, 2004
at 11:42am
Well, I ain't voting for a moron so there is your vote cancelled. Bush and Kerry suck but Kerry sucks less. “The only things that I can tell you is that every case I have reviewed I have been comfortable with the innocence or guilt of the person that I've looked at. I do not believe we've put a guilty … I mean innocent person to death in the state of Texas.” — GW Bush, June 16, 2000
I rest my case.
Anonymous
September 12th, 2004
at 12:38pm
BUSH: FLIP FLOPPER IN CHIEF
FLIP: Catching Bin Laden A PRIORITY.
“The most important thing is for us to find Osama Bin Laden. It's our #1 priority and we will not rest until we find him.”
-George W. Bush, September 13, 2001
FLOP: Catching Bin Laden NOT A PRIORITY.
“I don't know where Osama is, I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority.”
-George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
FLIP: Bush, the WAR President.
FLOP: Bush, the PEACE President.
FLIP: Bush opposes campaign finance reform.
FLOP: Bush signs campaign finance reform.
FLIP: Bush opposes and stalls a 9/11 commission.
FLOP: Bush supports it.
FLIP: Bush is against deficits
FLOP: Bush's policies create the highest deficits ever.
FLIP: Bush is against nation building.
FLOP: Bush engages in it.
FLIP: Bush opposes an Iraq WMD investigation.
FLOP: Bush grudgingly supports it.
FLIP: Bush is for free trade.
FLOP: Bush supports tariffs on steel.
FLIP: Bush is against a Homeland Security Department
FLOP: Bush takes credit for it.
FLIP: Bush is for states' right to decide on *** marriage.
FLOP: Bush then proposes amending the Constitution so they can't.
FLIP: Bush is against the U.S. taking a role in the Israeli Palestinian conflict.
FLOP: Bush then pushes for a “road map” and a Palestinian State.
FLIP: Bush first says that 'help is on the way' to the military.
FLOP: Bush cuts Veterans benefits.
FLIP: Bush says he'll provide money for first responders (fire, police, emergency).
FLOP: Bush dramatically shortchanges law enforcement.
FLIP: Bush-”The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden.”
FLOP: Bush-”I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care.”
FLIP: Bush says he'll take care of the environment.
FLOP: Bush then guts laws that protect the environment.
FLIP: Bush talks about helping education.
FLOP: Bush increases mandates while cutting funding.
FLIP: Bush said he would demand a U.N. Security Council vote on whether to sanction military action against Iraq.
FLOP: Bush then changes his mind and announced he would not call for a vote.
FLIP: Bush said the “mission accomplished” banner was put up by the sailors.
FLOP: Bush later blames his advance team.
FLIP: Rice will not testify before 9/11 Commission in public
FLOP: Rice will be allowed to testify before 9/11 Commission in pubic.
FLIP: Bush Regime won't release Aug 6, 2001 Daily Briefing.
FLOP: Regime moves to declassify Aug 6, 2001 PDB.
FLIP: Bush resisted a major role for the U.N. in Iraq
FLOP: Bush begs U.N. to take control of his criminal disaster.
BUSH OPPOSES CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION… “President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11.” [CBS News, 5/23/02]
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
BUSH UNDER PRESSURE FLIP FLOPS. BUSH DECIDES TO SUPPORT CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION “President Bush said today he now supports establishing an independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.” [ABC News, 09/20/02]
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020920.html
Anonymous
September 12th, 2004
at 12:39pm
http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/rollbacks/execsum.asp
http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/rollbacks/rollbacksinx.asp
http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/
Rolling Stone, December 11, 2003
Crimes Against Nature
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
George W. Bush will go down in history as America's worst environmental president. In a ferocious three-year attack, the Bush administration has initiated more than 200 major rollbacks of America's environmental laws, weakening the protection of our country's air, water, public lands and wildlife. Cloaked in meticulously crafted language designed to deceive the public, the administration intends to eliminate the nation's most important environmental laws by the end of the year. Under the guidance of Republican pollster Frank Luntz, the Bush White House has actively hidden its anti-environmental program behind deceptive rhetoric, telegenic spokespeople, secrecy and the intimidation of scientists and bureaucrats. The Bush attack was not entirely unexpected. George W. Bush had the grimmest environmental record of any governor during his tenure in Texas. Texas became number one in air and water pollution and in the release of toxic chemicals. In his six years in Austin, he championed a short-term pollution-based prosperity, which enriched his political contributors and corporate cronies by lowering the quality of life for everyone else. Now President Bush is set to do the same to America. After three years, his policies are already bearing fruit, diminishing standards of living for millions of Americans.
I am angry both as a citizen and a father. Three of my sons have asthma, and I watch them struggle to breathe on bad-air days. And they're comparatively lucky: One in four African-American children in New York shares this affliction; their suffering is often unrelieved because they lack the insurance and high-quality health care that keep my sons alive. My kids are among the millions of Americans who cannot enjoy the seminal American experience of fishing locally with their dad and eating their catch. Most freshwater fish in New York and all in Connecticut are now under consumption advisories. A main source of mercury pollution in America, as well as asthma-provoking ozone and particulates, is the coal-burning power plants that President Bush recently excused from complying with the Clean Air Act.
Furthermore, the deadly addiction to fossil fuels that White House policies encourage has squandered our treasury, entangled us in foreign wars, diminished our international prestige, made us a target for terrorist attacks and increased our reliance on petty Middle Eastern dictators who despise democracy and are hated by their own people.
When the Republican right managed to install George W. Bush as president in 2000, movement leaders once again set about doing what they had attempted to do since the Reagan years: eviscerate the infrastructure of laws and regulations that protect the environment. For twenty-five years it has been like the zombie that keeps coming back from the grave.
Anonymous
September 12th, 2004
at 12:40pm
“I will do anything to reelect George Bush”.
-Walden O'Dell, Diebold CEO
“It doesn't matter how the people vote, it only matters who counts the votes.”
-Joseph Stalin
Anonymous
September 12th, 2004
at 12:41pm
25 RULES FOR BEING A GOOD REPUBLICAN
1) You believe that drug addiction is a moral failing and a crime, unless the addict is a millionaire conservative radio jock which then makes it an “illness” and he needs our prayers for his “recovery”.
2) You believe that those privileged from birth achieve success all on their own.
3) You believe that the US should get out of the UN, and that our highest national priority is to enforce the UN's resolutions against Iraq.
4) You believe that government should stay out of people's lives but it needs to punish anyone caught having private *** with the “wrong” gender.
5) You believe that pollution is okay, so long as it makes a profit.
6) You believe in prayer in schools, as long as they don't pray to Allah or Buddha.
7) “Standing Tall for America” means firing your workers and moving their jobs to India.
8) You believe that a woman cannot be trusted with decisions about her own body, but that large multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind with no regulation whatsoever.
9) You believe that you love Jesus and Jesus loves you, and that Jesus shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary.
10) You hate the ALCU for representing convicted felons, but they owed it to the country to bail out Oliver North.
11) You believe that the best way to encourage military morale is to praise the troops overseas while cutting their VA benefits.
12) You believe that group *** and drug use are degenerate sins that can only be purged by running for governor of California as a Republican.
13) You believe it is wise to keep condoms out of schools, because we all know if teenagers don't have condoms they won't have ***.
14) You believe that the best way to fight terrorism is to alienate our allies and then demand their cooperation and money.
15) You believe that government medicine is wrong and that HMOs and insurance companies have your best interests at heart.
16) You believe that giving free health care to all Iraqis is sound government policy but giving free health care to Americans is socialism.
17) You believe that tobacco's link to cancer and global warming are “junk science”, but Creationism should be taught in schools.
18) You believe that waging war with no exit strategy was wrong in Vietnam but right in Iraq.
19) You believe that Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney was doing business with him, and a bad guy when Bush needed a “we can't find Bin Laden” diversion.
20) You believe that government should restrict itself to just the powers named in the Constitution, which includes banning *** marriages and censoring the internet.
21) You believe that the public has a right to know about the adulterous affairs of Democrats, while those of Republicans are a “private matter”.
22) You believe that the public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades but that Bush was right to censor 28 pages from the Congressional 9.11 report because you just can't handle the truth.
23) You support state rights, which means Ashcroft telling states what locally passed voter initiatives he will allow them to have.
24) You believe that what Clinton did in the 1960's is of vital national interest but what Bush did in the 80s is “stale news” and “irrelevant”.
25) You believe that trade with Cuba is wrong because it is communist, but trading with China and Vietnam is good for business.
Anonymous
September 12th, 2004
at 12:42pm
WHAT LIBERALS WHAT
Liberals want a government that does not use it's servicemen and women as though they were disposable items in support of one man's political future.
Liberals want a government that does not spend more than it takes in.
Liberals want a foreign policy that does not advocate pre-emptive strikes.
Liberals want health care for American children.
Liberals want polluters to comply with the clean air act.
Liberals want K-12 education to be a high priority, and well funded.
Liberals want our national parks protected.
Liberals want church and state to be separated. Always.
Liberals want citizens to make their own choices, not have the government make choices for them.
Liberals insist on a nation where the Constitution and Bill of Rights are respected and not subverted for any reason at all.
In short, Liberals want America back. And come November, we are taking it back. Count on it!
Hank
September 12th, 2004
at 3:19pm
Can we get off the politics?? If you want that talk, go to Fox, CNN or start your own blog. Obviously tech and politics are like fire and oxygen. One thing that seems true. Every four years the left, right and in between come out beating their chest as who is better. Then after the election, we go back into hiding with our lives. No matter who wins, it is up to you what you make of life. Bush, Kerry, Clinton, Williams, Smith or Jackson… it's all a figure head.
If your a republican and Kerry wins, sure your pissed, but come November 3rd, the alarm goes off and you go back to work. You may moan for a little but soon it's back to punchin the clock, mowing the lawn, going on vacation, paying taxes, etc. Then in four years you get out the rally caps. Same thing if your democrat. As long as we have this two party system, it will be business as usual.
It is cheap however to come in here posting anonymously.
Anonymous
September 12th, 2004
at 11:28pm
yea, grand old party, i got your grand old party right here.
Anonymous
September 13th, 2004
at 10:08pm
Yet another example of Pirillo anti-Americanism… I'm constantly amazed at how low liberals will go… conspiracy theories, forging of military documents, etc. Get a clue people, we are at war. Wake up and show a little faith in your country for a change.
No wonder Bush will win big this year… wacko left wingers totally ruin any credibility your party attempts to achieve.
Anonymous
September 14th, 2004
at 8:14am
Like I said before, this has nothing at all to do with liberalism. Conspiracy theories are not limited to liberals… how many right-wing conspiracy theories are there surrounding the Clinton administration, for example?
There is nothing wrong with questioning your leaders. It's much better than blindly following them.
Anonymous
September 14th, 2004
at 1:58pm
“As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.”
– George Washington
Anonymous
September 14th, 2004
at 2:02pm
“Can we get off the politics?? If you want that talk, go to Fox, CNN or start your own blog.”
HEY, THIS BLOG SUBJECT (FOUR MORE YEARS!) IS POLITICAL, ISN'T IT?
FOUR MORE WARS!!!
BUSHCO INTO OBLIVION!!!
Anonymous
September 14th, 2004
at 2:03pm
“If your workplace is safe, if your children go to school rather than being forced into labor, if you are paid a living wage, including overtime…if your food is not poisoned and your water drinkable…if our rivers are getting cleaner and our air isnÂ’t black with pollution…if people of all races can share the same public facilities, if couples fall in love and marry regardless of race, you can thank liberals. What defined conservatism, and conservatives, was their opposition to every one of these advances.”
Anonymous
September 17th, 2004
at 4:45am
let's send pirillo to iraq then we'll see if he continues his anti-americanism
Anonymous
September 17th, 2004
at 8:01am
That would be more likely to increase his so-called “anti-Americanism”, not decrease it. Being “anti-war” doesn't necessarily mean “anti-America”.
Anonymous
September 17th, 2004
at 9:11am
you guys that say Pirillo is anti-american cause he questions the government are idiots. It is our duty as americans to question the way the country is run. If we are to never question the leaders of this country, then we'd be a dictatorship….not a democracy. We have freedom of speech for a reason!!!
Anonymous
September 19th, 2004
at 1:13am
Sigh… Can't we all just get along?
Look, we don't have hurl the insults back and forth while replying to Chris' cheap little cry for attention, do we? Isn't it enough to leave it at his being foolish for having added this video link on his blog 2 YEARS after the silliness over the Pentagon crash was debunked?
If he wants to base his thinking on crackpot Frenchie ideas that even most of the French thought were loonie toons (see the Snopes.com link for the provenance of the story), well…, let him. If he really believes this nonsense, does that truly make him “gullible”, “ignorant”, “an idiot” or a purveyor of “paranoid, simple-minded, masturbatory nonsense?” Well, ok…, yes it does. {grin} But that's his gol' durn right as a Honda Prius-huggin', San Fran area livin' (I'm assuming from…, well, I don't know from what), tofu-eatin', Birkenstock-wearin', twice-yearly bathin' American! Actually, that last one was rather unfair — he looks remarkably well-groomed for a liberal-type. Rather thin, neat and single, you might say…
Look, if Chris wants to be a junior Dan Rather and blog before he's checked his facts, let him! We don't have to go calling him names, do we? {grin}
As to the “Anonymous” who quoted George Washington to butress his love of modern liberalism (and who might have been reading Tom Hartmann's fallacious treatise on *** “marriage” — or is coming from Al Franken or Jenaene Garofalo?), you are falling prey to a common fallacy — that of failing to account for the changing definition of terms over time. Washington wasn't referring to Liberalism with a capital “L” (as my bomb-throwing conservative fellow-posters {word to your mothers…} certainly were), rather he was speaking to more of a dictionary meaning of liberal — as in being liberal with one's time or money.
Greater freedom, openness, brotherhood, harmony and magnamity towards one's fellow-man were what he was expressing the hope of. All things that I would hope underpin those of all current political stripes. Note that he referred to “those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community” as a brake on how far equality of protection would be applied.
He wouldn't have been a fan of unrestrained hedonism (nor would have most of the other founders, well…, maybe Franklin {grin}) — which is one of the hallmarks of capitalized “L”iberalism. Or of never-ending demands for government largess (the dole). Or of abrogating our duty to defend the nation. Or of failing to extend the gifts of liberal (small-case) society to areas of the world that suffer from the lack. Or of the killing of the unborn for personal convenience. Or of attempts to remove all religion from the public square. Or of handing our soverienty over to international debating and thievery societies. Or of…, I could go on forever.
Washington was a deeply flawed man — he was a slave owner. But he was a man of his times, and as such wouldn't have recognized his ideas of liberality in what the Democrats, Greenies, Socialists, Communists and all the other hangers-on have twisted the age-old and venerable concepts of liberalism into.
So, Anonymous, please don't be so silly as to ever again attempt to buttress your stream-of-consciousness jumble of nonsense — that is modern Liberalism — with the words of someone who would despise and condemn so much of it.
But then again, it's probably your right as a liberal-pantywaist, commie-pinko American to do so. {grin}
Anonymous
September 19th, 2004
at 1:32am
Oh…, and (yes I'm Anonymous #902349851 from the previous message):
Chris, if you think that the government lies to us, why then do you attach yourself to a political philosophy that seeks nothing less than government takeover of the more important facets of our lives?
Since government lies to us, wouldn't all those wonderful new bureacrats in the Departments of “Health Care”, “Peace”, “Eracism” and “Sticking-it-to-the-Rich” (actually I kind of like the last one…), just to name a few, be just a likely to lie to us as those dastardly Pentagon war-mongers and all the other current departments do?
I know…, it's only the mean and nasty (not to mention irretrievably stupid) Republican administrations that lie to us, right? Yes, the saintly Democrats are “for the people” so they'd never do such a thing. So as long as we restrict the White House to proper, Liberal-thinking people we can have all the new government programs that we can ever concoct without a worry in the world. Right?
Huhmmmm…
Simon
April 17th, 2007
at 9:19am
Hi Lucy! Photo I received! Thanks!
privatcams
October 6th, 2008
at 3:46am
Diese süßen Girls bekommen gar nicht genug voneinander. Sowohl mit den Fingern als auch mit dem Mund genießen sie es, sich in den siebten Himmel zu schicken. Sie treiben es wild und ungehmmt auf der Couch.mehr Bilder >>Ähnliche Themen: Aussehen » Blondinen Oder klicke jetzt hier für mehr Pornofilme bei EinfachGeiler.com >>