<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Five Ways Vista is better than OS X?</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-5/#comment-726530</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:26:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-726530</guid> <description>You&#039;re my hero, Chris Pirillo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re my hero, Chris Pirillo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nishbot</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-714277</link> <dc:creator>Nishbot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-714277</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been using Vista for over 2 years now, since it&#039;s initial release in 2007. After 2 years and SP1, I have to admit, Vista has become a solid OS. People really need to look at this OS again.I have assembled my top 5 seemingly small yet wonderful things I love about Vista.1. While in sleep mode, Vista auto-searches for wi-fi hotspots. Upon resuming Vista, your computer is automatically connected if it&#039;s an open network (don&#039;t worry, if concerned about security, you can turn this feature off). This saves me a LOT of time. In XP, every time you resumed, you had to wait for it to connect.2. Search right from the Start menu. Much better than the old run command of XP. I can search any of my documents, music, program files, all from that bar, and it&#039;s a live search too, narrowing down my results as a type. Best of all, it searches WITHIN documents for certain phrases. Definitely useful!3. Power-saving features. I use a laptop, and battery is a big issue for me. Vista is a huge update from XP in that doesnt burn nearly as much battery, and you have greater customization over how you want power managed when on battery and AC. On a 6cell, I can achieve 5 and a half hours with the right settings!4. It&#039;s prettier. XP looks so archaic when I look back. Vista looks so aesthetically pleasing. And not just the aero (glass) feature everyone it talking about. They replaced the start button with an orb. Taskbar items are highlighted blue when you mouse-over them. All these little things that people don&#039;t notice. And the two tone taskbar itself looks nice. It&#039;s just visually appealing to the eyes, and when staring in front of a computer for hours, this really helps.5. Auto-defrag. Most vista users dont even know, but vista auto-defrags their laptop by default. And best of all, a window doesn&#039;t pop up or anything. Everything happens in the background w/o the user even noticing. Such a great improvement over XP!And finally, though it isn&#039;t small, still important.6. It&#039;s faster! Believe it or not, Vista is actually faster than XP in browsing and general application usage (sorry, but gaming still goes to XP). Vista makes better usage of dual core, and uses SuperFetch to pre-load commonly used programs into your RAM even if the computer just booted up! This makes a huge difference when opening up firefox. Instead of searching the harddrive then storing it in RAM, Vista already has it in RAM for you. Opening Firefox is quick.For the 2 years I&#039;ve had Vista, I haven&#039;t had any serious experiences except once when a printer couldn&#039;t function with Vista. On all other counts, I&#039;m more than happy I made the switch.Vista gets a lot of rag from people that either A) for some reason support Apple even though they&#039;re not getting paid for it (ie. MacFanBoys) or B) don&#039;t actually understand how a computer works. Most of the time, what slows Vista down is the insane amount of crapware that comes pre-loaded in machines you purchase (HP is NOTORIOUS for this), or if the chip is an AMD (AMD chips just suck with Vista, there&#039;s a reason Mac went with Intel).Do the research and use Vista on a machine from an owner that actually knows about computers and has removed all the crapware. You&#039;ll be very surprised at the speed and comfort Vista offers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Vista for over 2 years now, since it&#8217;s initial release in 2007. After 2 years and SP1, I have to admit, Vista has become a solid OS. People really need to look at this OS again.</p><p>I have assembled my top 5 seemingly small yet wonderful things I love about Vista.</p><p>1. While in sleep mode, Vista auto-searches for wi-fi hotspots. Upon resuming Vista, your computer is automatically connected if it&#8217;s an open network (don&#8217;t worry, if concerned about security, you can turn this feature off). This saves me a LOT of time. In XP, every time you resumed, you had to wait for it to connect.</p><p>2. Search right from the Start menu. Much better than the old run command of XP. I can search any of my documents, music, program files, all from that bar, and it&#8217;s a live search too, narrowing down my results as a type. Best of all, it searches WITHIN documents for certain phrases. Definitely useful!</p><p>3. Power-saving features. I use a laptop, and battery is a big issue for me. Vista is a huge update from XP in that doesnt burn nearly as much battery, and you have greater customization over how you want power managed when on battery and AC. On a 6cell, I can achieve 5 and a half hours with the right settings!</p><p>4. It&#8217;s prettier. XP looks so archaic when I look back. Vista looks so aesthetically pleasing. And not just the aero (glass) feature everyone it talking about. They replaced the start button with an orb. Taskbar items are highlighted blue when you mouse-over them. All these little things that people don&#8217;t notice. And the two tone taskbar itself looks nice. It&#8217;s just visually appealing to the eyes, and when staring in front of a computer for hours, this really helps.</p><p>5. Auto-defrag. Most vista users dont even know, but vista auto-defrags their laptop by default. And best of all, a window doesn&#8217;t pop up or anything. Everything happens in the background w/o the user even noticing. Such a great improvement over XP!</p><p>And finally, though it isn&#8217;t small, still important.</p><p>6. It&#8217;s faster! Believe it or not, Vista is actually faster than XP in browsing and general application usage (sorry, but gaming still goes to XP). Vista makes better usage of dual core, and uses SuperFetch to pre-load commonly used programs into your RAM even if the computer just booted up! This makes a huge difference when opening up firefox. Instead of searching the harddrive then storing it in RAM, Vista already has it in RAM for you. Opening Firefox is quick.</p><p>For the 2 years I&#8217;ve had Vista, I haven&#8217;t had any serious experiences except once when a printer couldn&#8217;t function with Vista. On all other counts, I&#8217;m more than happy I made the switch.</p><p>Vista gets a lot of rag from people that either A) for some reason support Apple even though they&#8217;re not getting paid for it (ie. MacFanBoys) or B) don&#8217;t actually understand how a computer works. Most of the time, what slows Vista down is the insane amount of crapware that comes pre-loaded in machines you purchase (HP is NOTORIOUS for this), or if the chip is an AMD (AMD chips just suck with Vista, there&#8217;s a reason Mac went with Intel).</p><p>Do the research and use Vista on a machine from an owner that actually knows about computers and has removed all the crapware. You&#8217;ll be very surprised at the speed and comfort Vista offers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeffrey</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-707719</link> <dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:08:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-707719</guid> <description>Excuse me? Dude, do you even know what Vista is? Know your operating systems. Vista is 100% more secure, cheaper, and less vunerable to Viruses and Trojans. C&#039;mon, please, you have to be kidding me. Vista DOES run more software. And has better protection. You can&#039;t copy &amp; paste something. If your going to buy an Apple product, get an iPod, because a Mac isn&#039;t worth buying.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me? Dude, do you even know what Vista is? Know your operating systems. Vista is 100% more secure, cheaper, and less vunerable to Viruses and Trojans. C&#8217;mon, please, you have to be kidding me. Vista DOES run more software. And has better protection. You can&#8217;t copy &amp; paste something. If your going to buy an Apple product, get an iPod, because a Mac isn&#8217;t worth buying.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rastamon</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-704787</link> <dc:creator>Rastamon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:16:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-704787</guid> <description>Five reasons PCs are better products than MACs:
1. Cost - I just bought a brand new, brand name laptop for my wife with an intel dual core processor, 300GB hard drive 2GB RAM 15.6 screen for $399. That&#039;s less than the cost of the highest end ipod.
2. Software availability - Many software applications are unavailable for MACs. I can name dozens of applications that are not available for MaCs. Many that are available for MAC cost more than the PC version as well.
3. Hardware components - When I need to add an internal hard drive, optical drive, or any other device to my PC, it&#039;s a very simple process.
4. Compatability - My PC is compatible with LCD projectors without having to buy a dongle. I don&#039;t need a special router or modem for my PC. When I create powerpoint presentations on my PC and save them on a flash drive, they appear the same whether I use a PC or MAC to present them.
5. Availability and variety - PCs and their peripherals are much more widely available to me and are offered in a wider variety. If I am am unsatisfied with the cost or quality of a product, I can choose another manufacturer, or buy the parts and build many items myself.You asked for 5, but below are a few more:
6. Exchange server works better with PCs
7. Free software, including most open-source software is available for PCs-only
8. itunes decreases your control of music files. It restricts your ability to burns CDs, transfer files to multiple machines, and convert to other formats.
9. Apple has a reputation for not following environmental standards for production. There are many PC manufacturers that follow and exceed most environmental standards for production of their hardware.
10. Apple has played a lead role in working with record and movie corporations to restrict user control of video and audio files.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five reasons PCs are better products than MACs:<br
/> 1. Cost &#8211; I just bought a brand new, brand name laptop for my wife with an intel dual core processor, 300GB hard drive 2GB RAM 15.6 screen for $399. That&#8217;s less than the cost of the highest end ipod.<br
/> 2. Software availability &#8211; Many software applications are unavailable for MACs. I can name dozens of applications that are not available for MaCs. Many that are available for MAC cost more than the PC version as well.<br
/> 3. Hardware components &#8211; When I need to add an internal hard drive, optical drive, or any other device to my PC, it&#8217;s a very simple process.<br
/> 4. Compatability &#8211; My PC is compatible with LCD projectors without having to buy a dongle. I don&#8217;t need a special router or modem for my PC. When I create powerpoint presentations on my PC and save them on a flash drive, they appear the same whether I use a PC or MAC to present them.<br
/> 5. Availability and variety &#8211; PCs and their peripherals are much more widely available to me and are offered in a wider variety. If I am am unsatisfied with the cost or quality of a product, I can choose another manufacturer, or buy the parts and build many items myself.</p><p>You asked for 5, but below are a few more:<br
/> 6. Exchange server works better with PCs<br
/> 7. Free software, including most open-source software is available for PCs-only<br
/> 8. itunes decreases your control of music files. It restricts your ability to burns CDs, transfer files to multiple machines, and convert to other formats.<br
/> 9. Apple has a reputation for not following environmental standards for production. There are many PC manufacturers that follow and exceed most environmental standards for production of their hardware.<br
/> 10. Apple has played a lead role in working with record and movie corporations to restrict user control of video and audio files.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rstat1</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-689880</link> <dc:creator>rstat1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:05:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-689880</guid> <description>This is in response to price argument.The last time I looked the cheapest mac was around $1300. Now I can build a PC  of the same or better spec for less than $900.I&#039;d say Macs are definitely more expensive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in response to price argument.</p><p>The last time I looked the cheapest mac was around $1300. Now I can build a PC  of the same or better spec for less than $900.</p><p>I&#8217;d say Macs are definitely more expensive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Travis</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-684589</link> <dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-684589</guid> <description>Just got my new iMac and wanna use it to share my internet bandwidth with my kids. I&#039;ve got to limit the speed though since every MB counts and kids can be thoughtless in downloading. Googled it, found traffic shaper XP (free), softperfect bandwidth manager. Tried to install them, but my iMac does not run .exe files. Oh it needs .dmg files apparently. Googled it again, with mac os x leopard search term mind you. Found none. Guess the more options available the better, at this time.Oh my airport card suddenly stops working. It&#039;s AU$79 please, thank you. Oh my harddisk stops spinning. It&#039;s AU$449 please, thank you. If it&#039;s any consolation, the harddisk is a 750GB one. I said &quot;If&quot;.Oh my wife uses my mac book pro for day to day computer actvities. Browsing, sending email, clicking, scrolling down, saving, shutting off. Oh she can update the softwares very easily as well, one click away as she likes to say. Very easy to use as all applications she&#039;d ever need are all put on the dock. Really intuitive!! Did I say mac book pro?? Sorry it&#039;s a cheap celeron notebook running ubuntu with awn dock installed. I told her it&#039;s a mac book pro, she didnt even care to confirm if it was true. she just wants to browse the internet!!! you don&#039;t deny a lady&#039;s needs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got my new iMac and wanna use it to share my internet bandwidth with my kids. I&#8217;ve got to limit the speed though since every MB counts and kids can be thoughtless in downloading. Googled it, found traffic shaper XP (free), softperfect bandwidth manager. Tried to install them, but my iMac does not run .exe files. Oh it needs .dmg files apparently. Googled it again, with mac os x leopard search term mind you. Found none. Guess the more options available the better, at this time.</p><p>Oh my airport card suddenly stops working. It&#8217;s AU$79 please, thank you. Oh my harddisk stops spinning. It&#8217;s AU$449 please, thank you. If it&#8217;s any consolation, the harddisk is a 750GB one. I said &#8220;If&#8221;.</p><p>Oh my wife uses my mac book pro for day to day computer actvities. Browsing, sending email, clicking, scrolling down, saving, shutting off. Oh she can update the softwares very easily as well, one click away as she likes to say. Very easy to use as all applications she&#8217;d ever need are all put on the dock. Really intuitive!! Did I say mac book pro?? Sorry it&#8217;s a cheap celeron notebook running ubuntu with awn dock installed. I told her it&#8217;s a mac book pro, she didnt even care to confirm if it was true. she just wants to browse the internet!!! you don&#8217;t deny a lady&#8217;s needs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hoopskidoodle</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-675143</link> <dc:creator>Hoopskidoodle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:23:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-675143</guid> <description>&quot;It’s the money, stupid. Uh. If you build a comparable Windows machine… with hardware that nearly the SAME… you’re going to probably spend the same amount of money.&quot;This is an absolute lie. The most egregious example of Apple&#039;s exorbitant pricing is memory. I priced a Mac Pro in 32 GB of 800Mhz memory (which should have been about  $800.00) and it increased the price of the system by $4000.00!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s the money, stupid. Uh. If you build a comparable Windows machine… with hardware that nearly the SAME… you’re going to probably spend the same amount of money.&#8221;</p><p>This is an absolute lie. The most egregious example of Apple&#8217;s exorbitant pricing is memory. I priced a Mac Pro in 32 GB of 800Mhz memory (which should have been about  $800.00) and it increased the price of the system by $4000.00!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: macuser</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-669625</link> <dc:creator>macuser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-669625</guid> <description>I think you are strongly biased on your comment, i´m a mac user from the 7 system now,
Leopard for a an average user was good but fora video professional like me is a a painfull experience.
Today i have choices in windows world whith more stability and
i dont care about macs pc or whatoever, i care about work done.
Lately i used a windows x64 os whith x64 apps ands nothing in the mac world has this level os stability. Sorry but the cosmetic features in a os, don´t compensate the lack of real support for really professionals apps.
Vista is crap, but osx is worse... :)
And where´s the x64 version of the creepy QuickTime? worse, Apple don´t plan to upgrade QuickTime soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are strongly biased on your comment, i´m a mac user from the 7 system now,<br
/> Leopard for a an average user was good but fora video professional like me is a a painfull experience.<br
/> Today i have choices in windows world whith more stability and<br
/> i dont care about macs pc or whatoever, i care about work done.<br
/> Lately i used a windows x64 os whith x64 apps ands nothing in the mac world has this level os stability. Sorry but the cosmetic features in a os, don´t compensate the lack of real support for really professionals apps.<br
/> Vista is crap, but osx is worse&#8230; :)<br
/> And where´s the x64 version of the creepy QuickTime? worse, Apple don´t plan to upgrade QuickTime soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mitch</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-669313</link> <dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:16:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-669313</guid> <description>I agree with Tim, who said that both OSystems have flaws. He is exactly right that the bigger Apple gets, the greater a target for hackers and virus/trojan/etc. writers they will become. I suspect that Mac is already the riddled with viruses and so forth but no one has really noticed yet because 1) OS X is such a blackbox that it is impossible for the average user to have any idea what is happening underneath. The fact that the product &quot;just works&quot; (as Apple users like to say) may be both a blessing and a curse. 2) The public is still in a bit of a honeymoon phase with the iPod, iPhone, the new iMac, and whatever else.I do believe OS X is safer than Windows for the moment. But it won&#039;t last. The more people use Apple, the more people will hack them. And personally, I do believe that Apple has a major leg up with the Unix base, but Microsoft will probably catch up. If not, Apple will enjoy their time in the sun until another giant comes along with a better product.The same thing will happen to Ubuntu in terms safety and such if it gets popular enough. We all need to realize that as technology changes, so do the targets and techniques of those who would harness it for less than honest purposes. Nothing and no one is immune. Its just the way it works.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tim, who said that both OSystems have flaws. He is exactly right that the bigger Apple gets, the greater a target for hackers and virus/trojan/etc. writers they will become. I suspect that Mac is already the riddled with viruses and so forth but no one has really noticed yet because 1) OS X is such a blackbox that it is impossible for the average user to have any idea what is happening underneath. The fact that the product &#8220;just works&#8221; (as Apple users like to say) may be both a blessing and a curse. 2) The public is still in a bit of a honeymoon phase with the iPod, iPhone, the new iMac, and whatever else.</p><p>I do believe OS X is safer than Windows for the moment. But it won&#8217;t last. The more people use Apple, the more people will hack them. And personally, I do believe that Apple has a major leg up with the Unix base, but Microsoft will probably catch up. If not, Apple will enjoy their time in the sun until another giant comes along with a better product.</p><p>The same thing will happen to Ubuntu in terms safety and such if it gets popular enough. We all need to realize that as technology changes, so do the targets and techniques of those who would harness it for less than honest purposes. Nothing and no one is immune. Its just the way it works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CHg Crew</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-658266</link> <dc:creator>CHg Crew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-658266</guid> <description>Chris Pirillo é um otário!
Passa a vida na frente de uma web-cam enquanto sua esposa sai com o amante e torra todo seu dinheiro.Essse outro songo-mongo que defende o Vista também é um idiota. Defender o Vista??? VTNC!!Abraços pros Nerds.
CHg RULA!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Pirillo é um otário!<br
/> Passa a vida na frente de uma web-cam enquanto sua esposa sai com o amante e torra todo seu dinheiro.</p><p>Essse outro songo-mongo que defende o Vista também é um idiota. Defender o Vista??? VTNC!!</p><p>Abraços pros Nerds.<br
/> CHg RULA!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-655064</link> <dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-655064</guid> <description>ANSWER TO PHIL600$ for 4GB?WTF?Dude,  Crucial sells 4 GB for about 100$. for Mac!:p</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANSWER TO PHIL</p><p>600$ for 4GB?</p><p>WTF?</p><p>Dude,  Crucial sells 4 GB for about 100$. for Mac!</p><p>:p</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MGJulius</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-652355</link> <dc:creator>MGJulius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 08:23:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-652355</guid> <description> First of all before i get on w/ my comment Mac and Windows are both good operating systems and both have good hardware.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all before i get on w/ my comment Mac and Windows are both good operating systems and both have good hardware.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: enisity</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-651400</link> <dc:creator>enisity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:05:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-651400</guid> <description> I run vista and love it. Especially on my older PC.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run vista and love it. Especially on my older PC.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ryancurran</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-651356</link> <dc:creator>ryancurran</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:02:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-651356</guid> <description> I run vista and hate it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run vista and hate it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ParkourReble</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/comment-page-4/#comment-651028</link> <dc:creator>ParkourReble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:20:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/04/09/five-ways-vista-is-better-than-os-x/#comment-651028</guid> <description> are you a fan boy? cusss if you are leave. right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you a fan boy? cusss if you are leave. right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.110 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.62 @ 2009-11-24 08:21:54 -->