Comments on: Did NASA Fake the Moon Landings?

By: Varun

Varun — Wed, 28 May 2008 23:45:07 +0000

I think we did land on the moon. Remember hawking’s principle the simplest explanation is what probably happened. Also if anyone would have disproven the moon landing it would be the russians. Did they? No!

By: VALIS

VALIS — Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:05 +0000

We went to the moon. I’ll admit that some of the hoax/conspiracy theories sound pretty convincing at first. If you keep digging, then you will find that the hoax theories and their supporters lack credence. I’ve been researching the hoax theories because I’m a skeptic, and some of the alleged hoax evidence seemed plausible to me at first. It’s also likely that there are fake moon landing photos created by hoax theorists.

Check out this documentary “Lunar Legacy” on Youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc&mode=related&search=

If you want to investigate a real conspiracy, then please research the building collapses on 9/11. The official theory explaining the ways in which three steel buildings (including building 7) collapsed is ludicrous. It falls into the category of “coincidence theory.”
The official report of the 911 commission supports a theory based on numerous coincidence. The convergence of these coincidences defies probability. Conspiracy theory is a much more plausible explanation than coincidence theory in the 911 case.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMWn-bQYfSc

http://www.ny911truth.org/r722/investigate_this.htm

By: Lisa Coultrup

Lisa Coultrup — Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:52:43 +0000

Hello

Listen, my Father worked in the LEM ( Grumman- Bethpage LI plant) program for years, I have all the photos,patches even the LEM Manual, so I can absolutely say with all honesty that we DID in fact go to the moon, and land on the moon.

:-)

By: shannon

shannon — Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:54:49 +0000

With all the latest picture tech, like the google earth pictures, why not blow up pictures of the landing sites to see if the equipment let is actually there?

By: Julian p. Keogh

Julian p. Keogh — Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:50:22 +0000

I think there is a good deal of evidence to suggest that some of those pretty pictures they took may have been done in a studio, but that doesnt necessarily mean they didn’t go there. They probably did that as a backup knowing there was a chance that some of the material they took on the moon may have been unusable.

One thing has always bothered me though.

Surely, before landing on the moon with people they would have tried to qualify the take-off from the moon and the docking in lunar orbit. This is a critical mission phase which should have been validated, because the chances of missing the lunar orbiter could not be considered as small.

It therefore begs the question, why didn’t they fly a technology demonstrator for that critical phase of the mission? Can it be considered irresponsible that they didn’t, or am I missing something here?

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:39:44 +0000

Here’s the proof!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:35:09 +0000

There are a bunch of videos on youtube that make pretty good arguments for why we did not go to the moon. Im not positive, but I will say that I honestly have doubts. Search youtube for “A funny thing happened on the way to the moon”. ; )

By: Al

Al — Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:57:46 +0000

Ah, the post-modernist view of history:

“Since I wasn’t there, it didn’t happen. And because you weren’t there either you can’t prove to me that it did.”

Need something more current? Give your head a full 360 by taking a look at this….

http://www.revisionism.nl/Sept11/Feedback01.html

The logic is flawless – when you ignore reality.

Cheers,

P.S Moon landing not faked. People will go back into space but NASA won’t be leading the way.

P.P.S. You were both lots of fun [and informative] at NV07’s online dating seminar.

By: Chrissy

Chrissy — Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:09:07 +0000

I saw the documentary “The Dark Side of the Moon” and it was interesting. Here’s the website for it: http://www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie/default.asp?ID=6

I really don’t have an opinion either way. With conspiracies, both sides have the ability infinitely disprove each other and they usually do.

By: Greg

Greg — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:37:45 +0000

We’re not going back to the moon. We started getting too close to an alien moon base, and Nixon had to make a deal with them. We don’t go back and they don’t destroy all human life on Earth.

This deal has been disclosed to every president since. That’s why Bush is the first to have said we’re definitely going back. He’s insane and fantasizes about making Armageddon happen. If he can’t make the fire spread out of the Middle East across the planet, he’ll try to get it to rain down from space.

And if you believe that, I’ve got a bridge for sale.

By: dccrowley

dccrowley — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:09:29 +0000

Hey sorry Chris! Did I just kill this conversation ;-)

By: Pauley

Pauley — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:22:51 +0000

YES! Yaye for the Moxy Früvous reference! :-D

– Pauley

By: Sam

Sam — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:19:35 +0000

LAST!

Last once again! Ha ha ha!

Perhaps I should get back to work instead of annoying everybody with useless comments.

Nah. I’ll keep on doing this.

By: SubWolf

SubWolf — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:28:54 +0000

This is a test comment after moving your site. :)

By: Bleu Caldwell

Bleu Caldwell — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:26:31 +0000

It better not be fake–otherwise my hopes of seeing lunar tourism within my lifetime have been utterly dashed! ;)