<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Defrag Your Hard Drives with Diskeeper for Windows</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: voicetube</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-629682</link> <dc:creator>voicetube</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:11:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-629682</guid> <description> I got this a couple weeks ago (Diskeeper Home) and it indeed ROCKS!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this a couple weeks ago (Diskeeper Home) and it indeed ROCKS!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: condorX2</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-629683</link> <dc:creator>condorX2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-629683</guid> <description> have you try playing your favorite pc games while you have the &quot;set and forget&quot; feature on?
its good or bad if you does that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you try playing your favorite pc games while you have the &#8220;set and forget&#8221; feature on?<br
/> its good or bad if you does that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chibichibifan04</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-629684</link> <dc:creator>chibichibifan04</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:21:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-629684</guid> <description> I use Iobit SmartDefrag. I love it but Diskeeper is good to.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Iobit SmartDefrag. I love it but Diskeeper is good to.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barney</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-556942</link> <dc:creator>Barney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:41:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-556942</guid> <description>Don&#039;t defrag flash drives. Not recommended since they work on different principles.Defragmenting a conventional harddrive is to
-improve/restore file access times for fragmented files
-improve overall system performance since the HDD is the bottleneck in almost any system due to it&#039;s mechanical nature.
-decrease drive wear and increase drive life and therefore in the long run, reduce hardware costs
-improve battery consumption [laptops]Flash drives are not mechanical,  and so are not affected by those drawbacks. Infact, a flash drive has a finite number of read/write cycles, so defragmenting those *may* possibly reduce their life some.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t defrag flash drives. Not recommended since they work on different principles.</p><p>Defragmenting a conventional harddrive is to<br
/> -improve/restore file access times for fragmented files<br
/> -improve overall system performance since the HDD is the bottleneck in almost any system due to it&#8217;s mechanical nature.<br
/> -decrease drive wear and increase drive life and therefore in the long run, reduce hardware costs<br
/> -improve battery consumption [laptops]</p><p>Flash drives are not mechanical,  and so are not affected by those drawbacks. Infact, a flash drive has a finite number of read/write cycles, so defragmenting those *may* possibly reduce their life some.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: beachbum</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-554993</link> <dc:creator>beachbum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:14:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-554993</guid> <description>have been trying to find out if a 4g almost full and daily mega used u3 usb drive should be defraged or have some kinda maintenence done?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have been trying to find out if a 4g almost full and daily mega used u3 usb drive should be defraged or have some kinda maintenence done?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barney</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-552159</link> <dc:creator>Barney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:18:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-552159</guid> <description>Diskeeper has been a good defrag utility for me; runs stable and defrags multiple drives quickly without using many CPU cycles.  So far I have not had a problem with it. I shall try the new version in a few days time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diskeeper has been a good defrag utility for me; runs stable and defrags multiple drives quickly without using many CPU cycles.  So far I have not had a problem with it. I shall try the new version in a few days time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BeechSundowner</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-552481</link> <dc:creator>BeechSundowner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:04:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-552481</guid> <description> Auslogics Disk Defrag is freeware and quicker then any commercial version.  I was using Perfect Disk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auslogics Disk Defrag is freeware and quicker then any commercial version.  I was using Perfect Disk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BeechSundowner</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-629685</link> <dc:creator>BeechSundowner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:04:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-629685</guid> <description> Auslogics Disk Defrag is freeware and quicker then any commercial version.  I was using Perfect Disk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auslogics Disk Defrag is freeware and quicker then any commercial version.  I was using Perfect Disk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Donn Edwards</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-551323</link> <dc:creator>Donn Edwards</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-551323</guid> <description>I am busy testing their latest version DK 2008, and I have also tested 15 other commercial defraggers and 16 freeware ones.You can find the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/09/great-defrag-shootout-winners.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;winners&lt;/a&gt;&quot; of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/06/great-defrag-shootout-all.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Defrag Shootout&lt;/a&gt;&quot; or check out the reviews of all the products mentioned.Diskeeper is definitely not the best defrag program out there, and it&#039;s by far the most expensive: up to $99! The home edition is $25, but you can get a full-featured version of PerfectDisk for under $40. My blog has a discount coupon for 20% discount, so you can get a &quot;real&quot; defragger for $32 instead of a partial one for $25. There are also some interesting and useful freeware utilities, so Diskeeper has got some real competiton on its hands.The built-in Windows Defragger is based on DK, and it suffers from the same problem: when you disk gets loaded (i.e. 20% free space) it can&#039;t cope and the disk gets more and more disorganised no matter how often you defrag, even with the &quot;Set it and forget it&quot; feature on.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am busy testing their latest version DK 2008, and I have also tested 15 other commercial defraggers and 16 freeware ones.</p><p>You can find the &#8220;<a
href="http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/09/great-defrag-shootout-winners.html" rel="nofollow">winners</a>&#8221; of &#8220;<a
href="http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/06/great-defrag-shootout-all.html" rel="nofollow">The Great Defrag Shootout</a>&#8221; or check out the reviews of all the products mentioned.</p><p>Diskeeper is definitely not the best defrag program out there, and it&#8217;s by far the most expensive: up to $99! The home edition is $25, but you can get a full-featured version of PerfectDisk for under $40. My blog has a discount coupon for 20% discount, so you can get a &#8220;real&#8221; defragger for $32 instead of a partial one for $25. There are also some interesting and useful freeware utilities, so Diskeeper has got some real competiton on its hands.</p><p>The built-in Windows Defragger is based on DK, and it suffers from the same problem: when you disk gets loaded (i.e. 20% free space) it can&#8217;t cope and the disk gets more and more disorganised no matter how often you defrag, even with the &#8220;Set it and forget it&#8221; feature on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tsudohnimh</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-551066</link> <dc:creator>tsudohnimh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:39:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-551066</guid> <description>I totally agree with the practice of defragging however I&#039;d like to suggest a much better tool. Check out JKDefrag ( http://tinyurl.com/2g8cgj ). I used Diskkeeper for years but it has gotten slower and more bloated. Not to mention the hell of &quot;continuous defrag&quot;. Check out the simplicity and efficiency that is JKdefrag. You&#039;ll love it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the practice of defragging however I&#8217;d like to suggest a much better tool. Check out JKDefrag ( <a
href="http://tinyurl.com/2g8cgj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2g8cgj</a> ). I used Diskkeeper for years but it has gotten slower and more bloated. Not to mention the hell of &#8220;continuous defrag&#8221;. Check out the simplicity and efficiency that is JKdefrag. You&#8217;ll love it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Abusamra</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-551060</link> <dc:creator>Joe Abusamra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-551060</guid> <description>Interesting video, glad you posted. For those viewers/readers interested, another option for defragmenting is PerfectDisk (www.raxco.com). In addition to defragmenting the MFT, it also defragments all NTFS metadata files (basically, another bunch of system files) that no other defragmenter handles, and consolidates free space so drives fragment more slowly.Regarding the expansion of the MFT, it&#039;s not necessary.When an NTFS drive is formatted, it creates the $MFT and it contains a fixed number of records that can be used. As files are created, then these records are used. Eventually, the pre-allocated number of records is filled up and the $MFT needs to &quot;grow&quot; - allocating another chunk of file records. Immediately adjacent to the $MFT is created what is called the MFT Reserved Zone. By default, it is 12.5% of the drive. If you have a 100GB drive, then the Reserved Zone is going to be 12.5GB - pretty large if you think about it. If you look in Windows Explorer/Properties on a drive, the free space shown is the total of both INSIDE and OUTSIDE of the Reserved Zone.The MFT Reserved Zone is created specifically to allow the $MFT to &quot;grow&quot; in a contiguous fashion. When the $MFT fills up, it allocates the space for its next group of file records from the free space located in the MFT Reserved Zone. NTFS will avoid putting files inside of the Reserved Zone unless you get into a low free space condition.As long as a defragmenter, such as PerfectDisk, ensures that the MFT Reserved Zone is kept clear of files (a technically advanced defragmenter like PerfectDisk ensures that this takes place), then NTFS takes care of this automatically and there is no need to artificially extend the size of the MFT - which does nothing for you except take up disk space that can only be recovered by re-formatting the drive. In addition, with Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Vista, defragmenters have the ability to defragment the majority of the $MFT online - further reducing the likelihood that the $MFT will ever be significantly fragmented.Thanks,
Joe Abusamra
Raxco Software</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting video, glad you posted. For those viewers/readers interested, another option for defragmenting is PerfectDisk (<a
href="http://www.raxco.com" title="http://www.raxco.com" target="_blank">www.raxco.com</a>). In addition to defragmenting the MFT, it also defragments all NTFS metadata files (basically, another bunch of system files) that no other defragmenter handles, and consolidates free space so drives fragment more slowly.</p><p>Regarding the expansion of the MFT, it&#8217;s not necessary.</p><p>When an NTFS drive is formatted, it creates the $MFT and it contains a fixed number of records that can be used. As files are created, then these records are used. Eventually, the pre-allocated number of records is filled up and the $MFT needs to &#8220;grow&#8221; &#8211; allocating another chunk of file records. Immediately adjacent to the $MFT is created what is called the MFT Reserved Zone. By default, it is 12.5% of the drive. If you have a 100GB drive, then the Reserved Zone is going to be 12.5GB &#8211; pretty large if you think about it. If you look in Windows Explorer/Properties on a drive, the free space shown is the total of both INSIDE and OUTSIDE of the Reserved Zone.</p><p>The MFT Reserved Zone is created specifically to allow the $MFT to &#8220;grow&#8221; in a contiguous fashion. When the $MFT fills up, it allocates the space for its next group of file records from the free space located in the MFT Reserved Zone. NTFS will avoid putting files inside of the Reserved Zone unless you get into a low free space condition.</p><p>As long as a defragmenter, such as PerfectDisk, ensures that the MFT Reserved Zone is kept clear of files (a technically advanced defragmenter like PerfectDisk ensures that this takes place), then NTFS takes care of this automatically and there is no need to artificially extend the size of the MFT &#8211; which does nothing for you except take up disk space that can only be recovered by re-formatting the drive. In addition, with Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Vista, defragmenters have the ability to defragment the majority of the $MFT online &#8211; further reducing the likelihood that the $MFT will ever be significantly fragmented.</p><p>Thanks,<br
/> Joe Abusamra<br
/> Raxco Software</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wataru Tenga</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-550975</link> <dc:creator>Wataru Tenga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:42:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-550975</guid> <description>I&#039;m really torn on this issue, since (1) I haven&#039;t defragged in several months and don&#039;t notice any performance hit (XP with 2GB memory, NTFS drives of 250 and 400 GB, regularly running around 50 or so processes, frequent installing and uninstalling of applications, 24 hour use for work and play), and (2) in the past when using Diskkeeper it actually seemed that performance dropped and problems increased. So is there solid, scientific evidence to show that defragging is necessary and beneficial?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really torn on this issue, since (1) I haven&#8217;t defragged in several months and don&#8217;t notice any performance hit (XP with 2GB memory, NTFS drives of 250 and 400 GB, regularly running around 50 or so processes, frequent installing and uninstalling of applications, 24 hour use for work and play), and (2) in the past when using Diskkeeper it actually seemed that performance dropped and problems increased. So is there solid, scientific evidence to show that defragging is necessary and beneficial?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ShieldStar</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-551278</link> <dc:creator>ShieldStar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:40:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-551278</guid> <description> I never said they weren&#039;t good, I was saying that they didn&#039;t need this stuff, therefore buying it will make decrease performance on an amazing machine. I love my iMac and will recommend it 9 times out of 10 to anyone who asks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said they weren&#8217;t good, I was saying that they didn&#8217;t need this stuff, therefore buying it will make decrease performance on an amazing machine. I love my iMac and will recommend it 9 times out of 10 to anyone who asks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vahnx1337</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-551279</link> <dc:creator>vahnx1337</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:29:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-551279</guid> <description> xD at your upgrade XP to Vista video. You should of also turned the volume down a bit, but I knew what was coming.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xD at your upgrade XP to Vista video. You should of also turned the volume down a bit, but I knew what was coming.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pclover</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-551280</link> <dc:creator>pclover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/10/25/defrag-your-hard-drives-with-diskeeper-for-windows/#comment-551280</guid> <description> i use Iobit SmartDefrag</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use Iobit SmartDefrag</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-25 07:27:49 -->