Even after setting up separate coupon codes and online shopping sections on Lockergnome, I was rejected for the CJ Performer today…
Based on the eligibility requirements, we regret to inform you that we are unable to accept you into CJ Performer. At this time, publishers are required to earn $10,000 in monthly paid commissions to qualify for CJ Performer. We would like to remind you to use the Login Manager of the CJ Account Manager(tm) to link all your Commission Junction and BFAST publisher accounts, so you can monitor your performance all at the same time. Should you meet the requirements of CJ Performer in the future, we encourage you to reapply at that time.
That wasn’t too upsetting. What pissed me off, however, is that the idiot at Comission Junction openly CC’ed other rejectees. Is Comission Junction really that stupid, or is it just me?
You can probably do two things, right now, to boost your Internet speed. They’re simple, they’re trusted, and they’re palpable changes:
- Open yourself to OpenDNS. They have configuration pages for your OS or hardware router. Both Scott Beale (LaughingSquid) and I have seen dramatic differences in speed since going through their DNS servers. Matt’s happy about it, too. My speed difference was probably even more dramatic, considering I’ve already implemented my second recommendation…
- If you’re on Windows, install FastCache: “Every time you go to a new website, or a website you haven’t been to in a day or so, your computer needs to locate the server again using DNS. Each DNS request can take anywhere from 50 milliseconds, to even a second or more, but most are in the 100 to 200 millisecond range. Want to save a couple hundred milliseconds? Probably not, but what about a couple million or more? That’s what AnalogX FastCache is all about.” I’ve been running FastCache since Mark released it on the first Helpathon. My stats are somewhat stunted, but I’ve saved 6d 18h 27m 53s worth of time (in 118w). It really adds up.
If you use a news aggregator, either one (or both) of these solutions is mandatory. Do not pass Go – do not spend $200. It’s all free for the taking.
Somehow, I hit this page on Microsoft the other day: preliminary documentation on how to make links (specifically, in Windows applications). This is a great tutorial for Internet links, too. Even if you already know how to create a link, do you really know HOW to create a link? Consider the points this article raises:
- Traditionally, links are underlined as well, but that approach is often unnecessary and falling out of favor to reduce visual clutter.
- Links lack affordance, which means their visual properties don’t suggest how they are used and are understood only through experience.
- Link text should indicate the result of clicking on the link.
- Use different colors for visited and unvisited links.
- Don’t use color for text that isn’t a link because users may assume that it is a link.
- Always show either an underline (for any link text) or a button frame (for command link text only) on hover to reinforce visually that the text is a link.
- Don’t underlined text that isn’t a link because users will assume that it is a link.
- Use background colors that contrast with the link colors.
- Use link text that is the most relevant part of the text and are large enough to be easy to click.
- Don’t provide an infotip [in HTML, a title element] that is merely a restatement of the link text.
- If a link requires further explanation, provide the explanation in either a separate text control or an infotip, but not both.
- Place optional supplemental graphics that indicates the target of a link to the right of the text and use an infotip to explain its meaning.
- Link to specific content rather than general content.
- Use a link only if the linked material is relevant, helpful, and not redundant.
- Link only on the first occurrence of the link text.
- Don’t add “Click here” to the link text. It isn’t necessary because a link implies clicking. Also, “Click here” and “here” alone are poor link text because they convey no information about the link when read by a screen reader.
- Start the link with an imperative verb and clearly describe the action that the link performs.
- Don’t use ending punctuation except for question marks.
I remember the first time I ever saw WIRED magazine – back when I was [email protected]cobra.uni.edu (in the early ’90s). It was pure literary awesomeness. Evan Hansen stumbled upon ‘freedbacking’ somehow, and wanted to know a little more about it. I’m still not sure the idea has legs, but I’ll have a super-simple Freedbacking.com set up some time after Gnomedex. From Are You ‘Freedbacking’?:
Tagging has already proven to be a powerful tool for organizing information on the web, and Pirillo’s twist of using a made-up word with no Google presence to jump-start a new category of conversation is an interesting idea. If enough people go along, Pirillo and others hope, the term could alert developers to feedback that just might make their products better.
Rock on. Evan and I talked about putting a word to there not being a word in Google. It’s not googlewhacking (which is when there’s only one result for a keyword or two). If the word doesn’t exist, and you’re trying to make it a word, shouldn’t it be something like a googlemology? I must note that, as of the time I’m writing this, the word “googlemology” is not showing up in Google. The story is becoming the story. Of course, that’s a googlification of the word “etymology.”