<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Braun Pulsonic 9595 Review</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Informant007</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-714967</link> <dc:creator>Informant007</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-714967</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been using Braun shavers since the late 1980&#039;s.  I started with the rectangular block-like Linear, went to the Syncro 7000 series, then the Activator 8000 series.  The latest, Pulsonic series, is nice but... well, Braun seems to have gone overboard for little improvement.I&#039;ve tried the 9595 model and compared to my 8595 Activator (basically the 8995 360), the shave is no better.  Plus, with the 9595 the sound is much louder.  I do like the &quot;hand grip&quot; design, but... seriously, the 8595 design was just fine as it is.  Probably not as ding/dent resistant, but I&#039;ve never dropped it.I once used a Philips Norelco triple head shaver and found that although it got to my neck hairs in fewer passes, the shave wasn&#039;t as close with the Braun.  After reading and hearing several testimonies of people who prefer Braun over Norelco, I decided to forgo getting the Norelco Arcitec and stick with Braun.  Basically, I&#039;m happy with it.  In about 5 minutes, I&#039;ve got a very nice clean and close shave.  It&#039;s not quite like a blade shave, but then I don&#039;t risk any cuts.  Plus, after about 2 hours from a blade shave, your whiskers are about on par with the electric shave.  Not that big a difference.The 9595 is expensive.  An impressive design, but not worth the extra money.  You can find discounted 8995 units for about half the cost, and they&#039;ll deliver an excellent performance.I understand the &quot;geek within&quot; craving a new gadget, but sometimes it&#039;s better to stick with what works well.  It&#039;s now about a year and half later and you didn&#039;t revisit your review.  I do wonder if you&#039;ve found it really much better than what you had before.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Braun shavers since the late 1980&#8217;s.  I started with the rectangular block-like Linear, went to the Syncro 7000 series, then the Activator 8000 series.  The latest, Pulsonic series, is nice but&#8230; well, Braun seems to have gone overboard for little improvement.</p><p>I&#8217;ve tried the 9595 model and compared to my 8595 Activator (basically the 8995 360), the shave is no better.  Plus, with the 9595 the sound is much louder.  I do like the &#8220;hand grip&#8221; design, but&#8230; seriously, the 8595 design was just fine as it is.  Probably not as ding/dent resistant, but I&#8217;ve never dropped it.</p><p>I once used a Philips Norelco triple head shaver and found that although it got to my neck hairs in fewer passes, the shave wasn&#8217;t as close with the Braun.  After reading and hearing several testimonies of people who prefer Braun over Norelco, I decided to forgo getting the Norelco Arcitec and stick with Braun.  Basically, I&#8217;m happy with it.  In about 5 minutes, I&#8217;ve got a very nice clean and close shave.  It&#8217;s not quite like a blade shave, but then I don&#8217;t risk any cuts.  Plus, after about 2 hours from a blade shave, your whiskers are about on par with the electric shave.  Not that big a difference.</p><p>The 9595 is expensive.  An impressive design, but not worth the extra money.  You can find discounted 8995 units for about half the cost, and they&#8217;ll deliver an excellent performance.</p><p>I understand the &#8220;geek within&#8221; craving a new gadget, but sometimes it&#8217;s better to stick with what works well.  It&#8217;s now about a year and half later and you didn&#8217;t revisit your review.  I do wonder if you&#8217;ve found it really much better than what you had before.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MartinHaldorsen</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646952</link> <dc:creator>MartinHaldorsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-646952</guid> <description> (718) 508-9596</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(718) 508-9596</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MartinHaldorsen</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646950</link> <dc:creator>MartinHaldorsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-646950</guid> <description> (718) 508-9596</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(718) 508-9596</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MartinHaldorsen</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646949</link> <dc:creator>MartinHaldorsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-646949</guid> <description> (718) 508-9596</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(718) 508-9596</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MartinHaldorsen</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646948</link> <dc:creator>MartinHaldorsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-646948</guid> <description> (718) 508-9596</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(718) 508-9596</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MartinHaldorsen</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-646951</link> <dc:creator>MartinHaldorsen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-646951</guid> <description> (718) 508-9596</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(718) 508-9596</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cajean1</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630422</link> <dc:creator>cajean1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 05:27:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630422</guid> <description> yea, i&#039;m like wtf? why am i listening to a review by someone like that???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea, i&#8217;m like wtf? why am i listening to a review by someone like that???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: decypher0</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630423</link> <dc:creator>decypher0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:47:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630423</guid> <description> lolz is this guy some roman aristocrat or something?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lolz is this guy some roman aristocrat or something?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jessup5</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630424</link> <dc:creator>jessup5</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:24:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630424</guid> <description> does this guy ever shut up...just get to the review already</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this guy ever shut up&#8230;just get to the review already</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ferroman1</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630425</link> <dc:creator>Ferroman1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:45:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630425</guid> <description> WHO CARES IF YOU SHAVE OR NOT?!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHO CARES IF YOU SHAVE OR NOT?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MikeGutierrez</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-571678</link> <dc:creator>MikeGutierrez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 03:25:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-571678</guid> <description>Thanks for the review. I am looking to try this razor out. In the past I have been using Norelco&#039;s but I am finding, like you, my hair is very coarse and curly and the Norelco irritating my skin easily. I have a Braun 7526 that I have recently switched back to recently.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. I am looking to try this razor out. In the past I have been using Norelco&#8217;s but I am finding, like you, my hair is very coarse and curly and the Norelco irritating my skin easily. I have a Braun 7526 that I have recently switched back to recently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mhsobhani</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630426</link> <dc:creator>mhsobhani</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:26:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630426</guid> <description> you talk too much man! cut 5 minutes of talking and shave everyday!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you talk too much man! cut 5 minutes of talking and shave everyday!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DigitalMuse</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-565723</link> <dc:creator>DigitalMuse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:18:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-565723</guid> <description>So do you still get ingrown hairs with this shaver?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do you still get ingrown hairs with this shaver?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ghostboyee</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630427</link> <dc:creator>ghostboyee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:42:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630427</guid> <description> Why does he mute when he shaves? Isn&#039;t this a review on the shaver or a review on how much he blabbers on? This is worst than spam. I do like the foil shavers more than Norelco. They shave closer, but are noisier. Used Braun 360, Panasonic Wet Dry lately.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does he mute when he shaves? Isn&#8217;t this a review on the shaver or a review on how much he blabbers on? This is worst than spam. I do like the foil shavers more than Norelco. They shave closer, but are noisier. Used Braun 360, Panasonic Wet Dry lately.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bone2thebone</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/comment-page-1/#comment-630428</link> <dc:creator>bone2thebone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:36:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/bruan-pulsonic-9595-review/#comment-630428</guid> <description> This freakin dude talks toooo much</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This freakin dude talks toooo much</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/35 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.61 @ 2009-11-23 21:32:38 -->