<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Another Inconvenient Truth?</title> <atom:link href="http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/</link> <description>News and Reviews! Geek, Internet Entrepreneur, Hardware Addict, Software Junkie, Book Author, Once TV Show Host, Technology Enthusiast, Shameless Self-Promoter, Tech Conference Coordinator, Early Adopter, Idea Evangelist, Tech Support Blogger, Bootstrapper, Media Personality, Technology Consultant, Thicker Quicker Picker Upper.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Rick</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-604053</link> <dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:01:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-604053</guid> <description>May I. We take Apple to task for letting people down. For starting with something light years ahead of anything Redmond would let out the door and then just applying their recognisable twist to it. They truly don&#039;t understand what they have. They&#039;re still in the clouds wondering what happened to their precious MacOS and asking themselves &#039;OS X - that&#039;s a MacOS innit?&#039; There&#039;s no way this can be a good thing.But let&#039;s then put this in perspective with Microsoft as a yardstick.1. Apple had the Opener hole for years. We were in direct contact with the author who started years earlier by trying to get Apple to fix it. Guesses vary but this was open for at least six years and it&#039;s not a hole - it&#039;s a CRATER said the author. And we agree: it&#039;s the biggest and dumbest security hole in the history of the &#039;secure&#039; PC. But it&#039;s fixed now.2. Apple had the Oompa Loompa hole open for years. We and Kevin Finisterre kept up a campaign for years to get it plugged. Especially Kevin really worked hard on it.Of course there are tonnes of small cosmetic glitches that are unforgivable. And Leopard sure as shite ain&#039;t ready for prime time. But now let&#039;s look at Windows.1. Endemically insecure model. Needs to be gutted completely. Microsoft Linux wouldn&#039;t be bad at all.2. Bill Gates has been apologising for his crappy system since at least 2002 and all he&#039;s done throughout his career is promise fixes.Compare two holes in OS X that never got hammered that hard with a hopeless architecture on Windows that&#039;s been part of Microsoft hype for six years. You can&#039;t compare. You simply can&#039;t.Microsoft&#039;s updates? To what? Update what? Update something that&#039;s NEVER going to work properly anyway?What difference does it matter?Are Apple the gentlemen of the computer business? No. To a great extent they&#039;re clowns. And frankly Microsoft treat their indies a LOT better. But bang for buck is higher with Apple&#039;s OS X no matter the frequency of updates because - put bluntly - Apple haven&#039;t succeeded in reducing Unix to Windows. Although admittedly they&#039;re trying real hard with the iPhone.Thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I. We take Apple to task for letting people down. For starting with something light years ahead of anything Redmond would let out the door and then just applying their recognisable twist to it. They truly don&#8217;t understand what they have. They&#8217;re still in the clouds wondering what happened to their precious MacOS and asking themselves &#8216;OS X &#8211; that&#8217;s a MacOS innit?&#8217; There&#8217;s no way this can be a good thing.</p><p>But let&#8217;s then put this in perspective with Microsoft as a yardstick.</p><p>1. Apple had the Opener hole for years. We were in direct contact with the author who started years earlier by trying to get Apple to fix it. Guesses vary but this was open for at least six years and it&#8217;s not a hole &#8211; it&#8217;s a CRATER said the author. And we agree: it&#8217;s the biggest and dumbest security hole in the history of the &#8217;secure&#8217; PC. But it&#8217;s fixed now.</p><p>2. Apple had the Oompa Loompa hole open for years. We and Kevin Finisterre kept up a campaign for years to get it plugged. Especially Kevin really worked hard on it.</p><p>Of course there are tonnes of small cosmetic glitches that are unforgivable. And Leopard sure as shite ain&#8217;t ready for prime time. But now let&#8217;s look at Windows.</p><p>1. Endemically insecure model. Needs to be gutted completely. Microsoft Linux wouldn&#8217;t be bad at all.</p><p>2. Bill Gates has been apologising for his crappy system since at least 2002 and all he&#8217;s done throughout his career is promise fixes.</p><p>Compare two holes in OS X that never got hammered that hard with a hopeless architecture on Windows that&#8217;s been part of Microsoft hype for six years. You can&#8217;t compare. You simply can&#8217;t.</p><p>Microsoft&#8217;s updates? To what? Update what? Update something that&#8217;s NEVER going to work properly anyway?</p><p>What difference does it matter?</p><p>Are Apple the gentlemen of the computer business? No. To a great extent they&#8217;re clowns. And frankly Microsoft treat their indies a LOT better. But bang for buck is higher with Apple&#8217;s OS X no matter the frequency of updates because &#8211; put bluntly &#8211; Apple haven&#8217;t succeeded in reducing Unix to Windows. Although admittedly they&#8217;re trying real hard with the iPhone.</p><p>Thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TheNetAvenger</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-554465</link> <dc:creator>TheNetAvenger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-554465</guid> <description>----
I want all of you Vista users to do this for me: fire up Windows Media Player 11 right now. For some of us, the URGE graphic looks wonky. URGE is no longer URGE, but Rhapsody - and the Windows Media Player team hasn’t bothered to update the client since this service change, and (consequently) the title bar of the Windows Media Player looks like ass for some of us. No word on when this is going to be updated.
-----Ok, you do realize that Urge is a 3rd party &#039;store&#039;, that is installed WMP11, and just like all other stores, it can be shown, shown as the default, etc.Just click on the downarrow and select Browser Other Online Stores, and if you don&#039;t see something you want to replace Urge with, turn it off so it doesn&#039;t show up as the default store.Why should MS issue a patch because you don&#039;t realize that Urge and WMP11 are NOT THE SAME THING?I find this lack of understand and insight more than a bit scary, and no wonder the WMP team told you to run along, I would of had a hard time not laughing at you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;-<br
/> I want all of you Vista users to do this for me: fire up Windows Media Player 11 right now. For some of us, the URGE graphic looks wonky. URGE is no longer URGE, but Rhapsody &#8211; and the Windows Media Player team hasn’t bothered to update the client since this service change, and (consequently) the title bar of the Windows Media Player looks like ass for some of us. No word on when this is going to be updated.<br
/> &#8212;&#8211;</p><p>Ok, you do realize that Urge is a 3rd party &#8217;store&#8217;, that is installed WMP11, and just like all other stores, it can be shown, shown as the default, etc.</p><p>Just click on the downarrow and select Browser Other Online Stores, and if you don&#8217;t see something you want to replace Urge with, turn it off so it doesn&#8217;t show up as the default store.</p><p>Why should MS issue a patch because you don&#8217;t realize that Urge and WMP11 are NOT THE SAME THING?</p><p>I find this lack of understand and insight more than a bit scary, and no wonder the WMP team told you to run along, I would of had a hard time not laughing at you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wes</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553945</link> <dc:creator>wes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:44:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553945</guid> <description>I guess the other inconvient truth mentioned in this post is that you&#039;re becoming so biased, you don&#039;t even notice it.&lt;blockquote&gt;Apple has also released incremental patches with frequency - rather than scheduling massive update roll-ups (”Service Packs”) to their customer base. Windows users are typically made to hunt down patches from an unweildy Knowkeldge Base (and in some cases, request the patch from Microsoft before they can download it).&lt;/blockquote&gt;This isn&#039;t nowhere near true. Microsoft releases updates and patches rather frequently. Apple has a notorious reputation of not updating its software for known flaws for months or beyond. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rixstep.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rixstep&lt;/a&gt;, no fan of Microsoft at all, has terrible things to say about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rixstep.com/1/20070425,00.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple&#039;s security response&lt;/a&gt; (and Rixstep will argue that even with that backdrop, people would be safer on OS X than Windows).And the complaint about an icon that no longer exists, and using that as reason to declare that Microsoft and Windows is beyond salvation is close to pathetic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the other inconvient truth mentioned in this post is that you&#8217;re becoming so biased, you don&#8217;t even notice it.</p><blockquote><p>Apple has also released incremental patches with frequency &#8211; rather than scheduling massive update roll-ups (”Service Packs”) to their customer base. Windows users are typically made to hunt down patches from an unweildy Knowkeldge Base (and in some cases, request the patch from Microsoft before they can download it).</p></blockquote><p>This isn&#8217;t nowhere near true. Microsoft releases updates and patches rather frequently. Apple has a notorious reputation of not updating its software for known flaws for months or beyond. <a
href="http://www.rixstep.com" rel="nofollow">Rixstep</a>, no fan of Microsoft at all, has terrible things to say about <a
href="http://www.rixstep.com/1/20070425,00.shtml" rel="nofollow">Apple&#8217;s security response</a> (and Rixstep will argue that even with that backdrop, people would be safer on OS X than Windows).</p><p>And the complaint about an icon that no longer exists, and using that as reason to declare that Microsoft and Windows is beyond salvation is close to pathetic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Naramore</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553915</link> <dc:creator>Robert Naramore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553915</guid> <description>IMHO Microsoft Windows XP Pro will be on my computer until I am drug into the street and forced to upgrade to Vista. I do not try to migrate to a new OS (especia;;y from Microsoft) until it has been out for 3 plus years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO Microsoft Windows XP Pro will be on my computer until I am drug into the street and forced to upgrade to Vista. I do not try to migrate to a new OS (especia;;y from Microsoft) until it has been out for 3 plus years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Buffam</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553893</link> <dc:creator>John Buffam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:55:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553893</guid> <description>Xbox 360 is awesom  ?  Chris, I think X360 is okay, but considering the overheating problems, etc, it is far from a perfect system. I have had 3 of them brick on me, I finally got a private repair done to the cooling system and it works fine now.I really believe you are biased about Vista.  Sounds like Im picking a fight, but I have had it on 2 laptops now without a single problem. Its stable, easy to use, cheap hardware, convenient considering the world uses Windows by a massive majority.Leopard is good, freezing on some people going in and the same newbie bumps any system has.  I use Windows movie maker quite often and never have a problem. All in all, a bias shows</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xbox 360 is awesom  ?  Chris, I think X360 is okay, but considering the overheating problems, etc, it is far from a perfect system. I have had 3 of them brick on me, I finally got a private repair done to the cooling system and it works fine now.</p><p>I really believe you are biased about Vista.  Sounds like Im picking a fight, but I have had it on 2 laptops now without a single problem. Its stable, easy to use, cheap hardware, convenient considering the world uses Windows by a massive majority.</p><p>Leopard is good, freezing on some people going in and the same newbie bumps any system has.  I use Windows movie maker quite often and never have a problem. All in all, a bias shows</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Buffam</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553892</link> <dc:creator>John Buffam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553892</guid> <description>Never had a blue screen on vista. Have Leopard now on the Mac, few flaws, but not bad.  Im lucky enough to use both systems all the time and keep my mind open. The hype about Vista being so bad is nonsense, I had more problems with XP than I have had with Vista and my Vista machine has been up and running for a month now steady only to reboot for system updates.  It looks now like the hackers are going after the Macs.  With all the negative advertising Apple does about Windows, its a bit of Karma.  That being said, I do like Leopard, and am not strictly a Mac basher.http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,139186-c,trojanhorses/article.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never had a blue screen on vista. Have Leopard now on the Mac, few flaws, but not bad.  Im lucky enough to use both systems all the time and keep my mind open. The hype about Vista being so bad is nonsense, I had more problems with XP than I have had with Vista and my Vista machine has been up and running for a month now steady only to reboot for system updates.  It looks now like the hackers are going after the Macs.  With all the negative advertising Apple does about Windows, its a bit of Karma.  That being said, I do like Leopard, and am not strictly a Mac basher.</p><p><a
href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,139186-c,trojanhorses/article.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,139186-c,trojanhorses/article.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil Anderson</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553705</link> <dc:creator>Neil Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:49:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553705</guid> <description>Yep, the road for switchers is a bit bumpy at the beginning. Hang in there, it may take a couple of months before you&#039;re cruising a smooth highway.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the road for switchers is a bit bumpy at the beginning. Hang in there, it may take a couple of months before you&#8217;re cruising a smooth highway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Minot Isok</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553640</link> <dc:creator>Minot Isok</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553640</guid> <description>Chris,
I always wondered about those white pixels. I&#039;ve had WMP 11 since it was offered as beta and I&#039;ve always had those pixels. I just end up doing a full screen and then restore to regular size.Whatever!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br
/> I always wondered about those white pixels. I&#8217;ve had WMP 11 since it was offered as beta and I&#8217;ve always had those pixels. I just end up doing a full screen and then restore to regular size.</p><p>Whatever!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jean Costa</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553631</link> <dc:creator>Jean Costa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:19:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553631</guid> <description>Hey Chris,I sent you this on irc, but idk if you got it.Anyways,Here is a screen shot for you, of the same problems you exhibited, this would be for windows xp http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/8296/xpxm1.jpg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris,</p><p>I sent you this on irc, but idk if you got it.</p><p>Anyways,</p><p>Here is a screen shot for you, of the same problems you exhibited, this would be for windows xp <a
href="http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/8296/xpxm1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/8296/xpxm1.jpg</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carlos</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553626</link> <dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553626</guid> <description>&gt;Be prepared to get attacked for that decision, as well as to face a &gt;completely different set of problems.That is exactly right. OS X is not perfect and indeed has its own set of problems, but the overall experience is considerably good: consistent, well-thought out GUI, rock solid unix, great applications included with the OS, and a great mix of commercial and shareware software, to name  a few.I switched from XP about three years ago and still use XP with my Macbook Pro. No need for dealing with Vista hell.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Be prepared to get attacked for that decision, as well as to face a &gt;completely different set of problems.</p><p>That is exactly right. OS X is not perfect and indeed has its own set of problems, but the overall experience is considerably good: consistent, well-thought out GUI, rock solid unix, great applications included with the OS, and a great mix of commercial and shareware software, to name  a few.</p><p>I switched from XP about three years ago and still use XP with my Macbook Pro. No need for dealing with Vista hell.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: _Tux_</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553595</link> <dc:creator>_Tux_</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553595</guid> <description>Is anyone else tired of all the Vista bashing? If you don&#039;t like it, DON&#039;T USE IT!I&#039;m very happy with my install of Vista, its going fine and hasn&#039;t blue screened once</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else tired of all the Vista bashing? If you don&#8217;t like it, DON&#8217;T USE IT!</p><p>I&#8217;m very happy with my install of Vista, its going fine and hasn&#8217;t blue screened once</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TheDub</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553592</link> <dc:creator>TheDub</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:47:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553592</guid> <description>Hey Chris. I fired up Media Player 11... it doesn&#039;t say Urge anymore. Instead it shows a Windows Flag and says Media Guide. Just thought I&#039;d let you know they did change it.. not to Rhapsody but Windows Media Guide. It appears to be some sort of music marketplace. Could this be Windows&#039;s iTunes store?
Also upon installing Windows fresh it downloads 40* updates for Vista or 114 for XP. It would seem they obviously do incremental updating to, not just service packs. The difference of XP to Vista is a huge one.. Upon reading multiple reviews it would seem that all the OS X versions 10.0-10.5 for the most part have been minor fixes and &quot;new&quot; features. XP to Vista is more then new features, its a new driver model, a new kernel structure, ... I mean.. I think its unfair to say MS isn&#039;t trying. Vista has had a bumpy road no doubt. There are many bugs that aren&#039;t fixed and maybe even wont be fixed.Service Pack 1 last time I heard anything about it is supposed to be released this month or next. It kind of seems like they are gearing up for it to. A few days ago Windows Vista BSOD&#039;d when trying to go to sleep. I was angry but felt better when Windows started back up it checked the internet and said Sidebar.exe prevented the computer from properly entering sleep. blah blah blah This problem was reported to Microsoft and has already been resolved and will be fixed in a future release.
...it said something to that effect. I thought that was cool and am looking forward to SP1. Hopefully it fixes some of lingering bugs in the software.TheDub</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris. I fired up Media Player 11&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t say Urge anymore. Instead it shows a Windows Flag and says Media Guide. Just thought I&#8217;d let you know they did change it.. not to Rhapsody but Windows Media Guide. It appears to be some sort of music marketplace. Could this be Windows&#8217;s iTunes store?<br
/> Also upon installing Windows fresh it downloads 40* updates for Vista or 114 for XP. It would seem they obviously do incremental updating to, not just service packs. The difference of XP to Vista is a huge one.. Upon reading multiple reviews it would seem that all the OS X versions 10.0-10.5 for the most part have been minor fixes and &#8220;new&#8221; features. XP to Vista is more then new features, its a new driver model, a new kernel structure, &#8230; I mean.. I think its unfair to say MS isn&#8217;t trying. Vista has had a bumpy road no doubt. There are many bugs that aren&#8217;t fixed and maybe even wont be fixed.</p><p>Service Pack 1 last time I heard anything about it is supposed to be released this month or next. It kind of seems like they are gearing up for it to. A few days ago Windows Vista BSOD&#8217;d when trying to go to sleep. I was angry but felt better when Windows started back up it checked the internet and said Sidebar.exe prevented the computer from properly entering sleep. blah blah blah This problem was reported to Microsoft and has already been resolved and will be fixed in a future release.<br
/> &#8230;it said something to that effect. I thought that was cool and am looking forward to SP1. Hopefully it fixes some of lingering bugs in the software.</p><p>TheDub</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: W1ck3d</title><link>http://chris.pirillo.com/another-inconvenient-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-553588</link> <dc:creator>W1ck3d</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:39:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chris.pirillo.com/2007/11/01/another-inconvenient-truth/#comment-553588</guid> <description>Agreed, and well written.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, and well written.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 12/33 queries in 0.026 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.chris.pirillo.com

Served from: 192.168.20.62 @ 2009-11-24 20:47:26 -->