E-Mail:

Computer Monitor Energy Efficiency

Where do your monitors go when they die? “Ice Ardor” has been thinking about it for quite some time…

In today’s tech world, monitors are getting bigger and bigger. 12-inch monitors used to be normal sized, and then 15- and 17-inch. I myself have a 17-inch monitor at 1280×1024px (the maximum my graphics card will support), and sometimes I wish I had more screen real estate. But something that constantly makes me worry is how a larger monitor means not only will my electricity bill be higher, but I am negatively impacting the environment. Sometimes I don’t need anything bigger than 17 inches, and so powering up a 30 inch monitor, for example, would be wasteful of energy. And even though there have been some great advancements in monitor technology, particularly the switch to CRT to LCD (I’ve got a CRT), larger monitors still produce more heat. More heat means global warming and wasted energy that was derived from some form of energy, most likely nonrenewable.

Americans continue to embrace unnecessary inefficiencies. For example, Windows Vista Ultimate has an animated wallpaper option. That’s wasted CPU power. Another example, screen savers were invented a long time ago when they actually saved screens. Now that isn’t an issue with monitors, yet our screen savers are more graphically complex than they used to be. When we’re away from our computers, do we really need to have some fancy schmancy graphics animation using more CPU than when we are sitting down at our computer? Another example, the yule log video, while cool, probably isn’t as good as the real thing, and justs wastes energy. There’s better ways to get into the Christmas season (eggnog, anyone?). Furthermore, with increasingly large monitors, the power consumption of the monitor and CPU for unnecessary tasks is quite significant.

I was also noticing that monitors are one of the things that people update with a new computer purchase. A lot of people who buy a new computer buy a new monitor. This means there are an excess of old monitors in the world, and unfortunately, they are costly to recycle due to hazardous chemicals. In today’s technology age, I don’t think people are really seeing the damage done to this earth just to have “the latest and greatest”.

I definately don’t mean this to be a personal attack on anyone who chooses to have more screen real estate (hey, I’d take a 21-inch if someone offered it to me), but do you think that there is a balance between screen size and energy efficiency? If you could throw this out to the chatroom (maybe make a video of it, too), I’d love to hear what people have to say about monitor size (energy efficiency vs human productivity), energy-wasteful applications, and the technological habit for upgrading monitors.

So, what do you do with your old monitors?

5 Comments

I haven’t had an old monitor to throw out, but the last one that we had was donated to someone we know who recycles old computers and gives them to kids who can’t afford their own. This way, the monitor is still in use, just not by us.

If possible I use my old monitor to use as a second monitor. If I can’t then I try and sell it to my friends and as a last resort I’ll throw it away.

Recycle them or give them away for free. If monitor is still good, you can try selling it too.

There’s a new push in tech shops (well, big ones at least) to accept old technology so a special recycle organization can pick them up later.
I think it’s a great deal and should be promoted by everyone.

LCD’s are a lot more energy conservative that CRT’s. So my first wish would be to get rid of all CRT’s, as I did in my house.

Also, best bet would be to choose the monitor that you will use for certain task. In my house, there’s 15inch (laptop), 19-inch and 22-inch. When I need more space on desktop, I move to 22-inch one, if less, I use my laptop… also combing them when I’m multitasking much.

And finally, remove the screensaver and put the monitor to turn itself off after 5 or 10 minutes of idle time. Use only one computer to do tasks overnight (downloading, compiling, etc.), the rest can be configured to go into sleep more or hibernation after half an hour or depending on your preference.

P.S. If you use a lot of computer that are always on, like for Folding@home or even servers, it’s good to have a small LCD monitor (also weight is factor) that you can plug into computer and start working on this specific box.
Remote control is another alternative, you don’t need a monitor for that!

I want to know the pro’s & cons of a CRT versus LCD monitors.
I have a 19″ CRT that will need to be replaced soon.
Anybody have comments ?

Urban Underbrink

April 15th, 2008
at 5:13am

I use a 22″ widescreen LCD monitor. My first monitor purchased with an IBM 166 MHz computer was a 17″ Sony and it still works. Gave $4600 for the complete setup but have built my last 4 computers. I use a monitor until it quits or include it with an old computer I’m selling. All my computers still work good though only the last two are fast enough for todays software.

What Do You Think?